kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/fs/fuse/dev.c, branch linux-4.19.y

fuse: Initialize beyond-EOF page contents before setting uptodate

2024-09-04T11:12:58+00:00

commit 3c0da3d163eb32f1f91891efaade027fa9b245b9 upstream. fuse_notify_store(), unlike fuse_do_readpage(), does not enable page zeroing (because it can be used to change partial page contents). So fuse_notify_store() must be more careful to fully initialize page contents (including parts of the page that are beyond end-of-file) before marking the page uptodate. The current code can leave beyond-EOF page contents uninitialized, which makes these uninitialized page contents visible to userspace via mmap(). This is an information leak, but only affects systems which do not enable init-on-alloc (via CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON=y or the corresponding kernel command line parameter). Link: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=2574 Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: a1d75f258230 ("fuse: add store request") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: fix pipe buffer lifetime for direct_io

2022-04-15T12:14:37+00:00

commit 0c4bcfdecb1ac0967619ee7ff44871d93c08c909 upstream. In FOPEN_DIRECT_IO mode, fuse_file_write_iter() calls fuse_direct_write_iter(), which normally calls fuse_direct_io(), which then imports the write buffer with fuse_get_user_pages(), which uses iov_iter_get_pages() to grab references to userspace pages instead of actually copying memory. On the filesystem device side, these pages can then either be read to userspace (via fuse_dev_read()), or splice()d over into a pipe using fuse_dev_splice_read() as pipe buffers with &nosteal_pipe_buf_ops. This is wrong because after fuse_dev_do_read() unlocks the FUSE request, the userspace filesystem can mark the request as completed, causing write() to return. At that point, the userspace filesystem should no longer have access to the pipe buffer. Fix by copying pages coming from the user address space to new pipe buffers. Reported-by: Jann Horn Fixes: c3021629a0d8 ("fuse: support splice() reading from fuse device") Cc: Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Zach O'Keefe Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: release pipe buf after last use

2021-12-01T08:27:44+00:00

commit 473441720c8616dfaf4451f9c7ea14f0eb5e5d65 upstream. Checking buf->flags should be done before the pipe_buf_release() is called on the pipe buffer, since releasing the buffer might modify the flags. This is exactly what page_cache_pipe_buf_release() does, and which results in the same VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page)) that the original patch was trying to fix. Reported-by: Justin Forbes Fixes: 712a951025c0 ("fuse: fix page stealing") Cc: # v2.6.35 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: fix page stealing

2021-12-01T08:27:39+00:00

commit 712a951025c0667ff00b25afc360f74e639dfabe upstream. It is possible to trigger a crash by splicing anon pipe bufs to the fuse device. The reason for this is that anon_pipe_buf_release() will reuse buf->page if the refcount is 1, but that page might have already been stolen and its flags modified (e.g. PG_lru added). This happens in the unlikely case of fuse_dev_splice_write() getting around to calling pipe_buf_release() after a page has been stolen, added to the page cache and removed from the page cache. Fix by calling pipe_buf_release() right after the page was inserted into the page cache. In this case the page has an elevated refcount so any release function will know that the page isn't reusable. Reported-by: Frank Dinoff Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAAmZXrsGg2xsP1CK+cbuEMumtrqdvD-NKnWzhNcvn71RV3c1yw@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device") Cc: # v2.6.35 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: reject internal errno

2021-07-20T14:16:03+00:00

commit 49221cf86d18bb66fe95d3338cb33bd4b9880ca5 upstream. Don't allow userspace to report errors that could be kernel-internal. Reported-by: Anatoly Trosinenko Fixes: 334f485df85a ("[PATCH] FUSE - device functions") Cc: # v2.6.14 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: check connected before queueing on fpq->io

2021-07-20T14:15:42+00:00

commit 80ef08670d4c28a06a3de954bd350368780bcfef upstream. A request could end up on the fpq->io list after fuse_abort_conn() has reset fpq->connected and aborted requests on that list: Thread-1 Thread-2 ======== ======== ->fuse_simple_request() ->shutdown ->__fuse_request_send() ->queue_request() ->fuse_abort_conn() ->fuse_dev_do_read() ->acquire(fpq->lock) ->wait_for(fpq->lock) ->set err to all req's in fpq->io ->release(fpq->lock) ->acquire(fpq->lock) ->add req to fpq->io After the userspace copy is done the request will be ended, but req->out.h.error will remain uninitialized. Also the copy might block despite being already aborted. Fix both issues by not allowing the request to be queued on the fpq->io list after fuse_abort_conn() has processed this list. Reported-by: Pradeep P V K Fixes: fd22d62ed0c3 ("fuse: no fc->lock for iqueue parts") Cc: # v4.2 Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: fix page dereference after free

2020-11-05T10:08:34+00:00

commit d78092e4937de9ce55edcb4ee4c5e3c707be0190 upstream. After unlock_request() pages from the ap->pages[] array may be put (e.g. by aborting the connection) and the pages can be freed. Prevent use after free by grabbing a reference to the page before calling unlock_request(). The original patch was created by Pradeep P V K. Reported-by: Pradeep P V K Cc: Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fuse: don't check refcount after stealing page

2020-10-01T11:14:44+00:00

[ Upstream commit 32f98877c57bee6bc27f443a96f49678a2cd6a50 ] page_count() is unstable. Unless there has been an RCU grace period between when the page was removed from the page cache and now, a speculative reference may exist from the page cache. Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: fix weird page warning

2020-07-29T08:16:46+00:00

commit a5005c3cda6eeb6b95645e6cc32f58dafeffc976 upstream. When PageWaiters was added, updating this check was missed. Reported-by: Nikolaus Rath Reported-by: Hugh Dickins Fixes: 62906027091f ("mm: add PageWaiters indicating tasks are waiting for a page bit") Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: André Almeida Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fuse: fix deadlock with aio poll and fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock

2019-10-05T11:10:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 76e43c8ccaa35c30d5df853013561145a0f750a5 ] When IOCB_CMD_POLL is used on the FUSE device, aio_poll() disables IRQs and takes kioctx::ctx_lock, then fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock. This may have to wait for fuse_iqueue::waitq.lock to be released by one of many places that take it with IRQs enabled. Since the IRQ handler may take kioctx::ctx_lock, lockdep reports that a deadlock is possible. Fix it by protecting the state of struct fuse_iqueue with a separate spinlock, and only accessing fuse_iqueue::waitq using the versions of the waitqueue functions which do IRQ-safe locking internally. Reproducer: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int main() { char opts[128]; int fd = open("/dev/fuse", O_RDWR); aio_context_t ctx = 0; struct iocb cb = { .aio_lio_opcode = IOCB_CMD_POLL, .aio_fildes = fd }; struct iocb *cbp = &cb; sprintf(opts, "fd=%d,rootmode=040000,user_id=0,group_id=0", fd); mkdir("mnt", 0700); mount("foo", "mnt", "fuse", 0, opts); syscall(__NR_io_setup, 1, &ctx); syscall(__NR_io_submit, ctx, 1, &cbp); } Beginning of lockdep output: ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 5.3.0-rc5 #9 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- syz_fuse/135 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: 000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] 000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1751 [inline] 000000003590ceda (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x203/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825 and this task is already holding: 0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:363 [inline] 0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1749 [inline] 0000000075037284 (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one.constprop.0+0x1f4/0x5b0 fs/aio.c:1825 which would create a new lock dependency: (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} [...] Reported-by: syzbot+af05535bb79520f95431@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+d86c4426a01f60feddc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: bfe4037e722e ("aio: implement IOCB_CMD_POLL") Cc: # v4.19+ Cc: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman