kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/fs/hfsplus, branch linux-4.19.y

hfsplus: don't query the device logical block size multiple times

2024-12-05T09:59:30+00:00

[ Upstream commit 1c82587cb57687de3f18ab4b98a8850c789bedcf ] Devices block sizes may change. One of these cases is a loop device by using ioctl LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE. While this may cause other issues like IO being rejected, in the case of hfsplus, it will allocate a block by using that size and potentially write out-of-bounds when hfsplus_read_wrapper calls hfsplus_submit_bio and the latter function reads a different io_size. Using a new min_io_size initally set to sb_min_blocksize works for the purposes of the original fix, since it will be set to the max between HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE and the first seen logical block size. We still use the max between HFSPLUS_SECTOR_SIZE and min_io_size in case the latter is not initialized. Tested by mounting an hfsplus filesystem with loop block sizes 512, 1024 and 4096. The produced KASAN report before the fix looks like this: [ 419.944641] ================================================================== [ 419.945655] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.946703] Read of size 2 at addr ffff88800721fc00 by task repro/10678 [ 419.947612] [ 419.947846] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 10678 Comm: repro Not tainted 6.12.0-rc5-00008-gdf56e0f2f3ca #84 [ 419.949007] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [ 419.950035] Call Trace: [ 419.950384] [ 419.950676] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x78 [ 419.951212] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.951830] print_report+0x14c/0x49e [ 419.952361] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x267/0x278 [ 419.952979] ? kmem_cache_debug_flags+0xc/0x1d [ 419.953561] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.954231] kasan_report+0x89/0xb0 [ 419.954748] ? hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.955367] hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x659/0xa0a [ 419.955948] ? __pfx_hfsplus_read_wrapper+0x10/0x10 [ 419.956618] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x59/0x1a9 [ 419.957214] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1a/0x2e [ 419.957772] hfsplus_fill_super+0x348/0x1590 [ 419.958355] ? hlock_class+0x4c/0x109 [ 419.958867] ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 [ 419.959499] ? __pfx_string+0x10/0x10 [ 419.960006] ? lock_acquire+0x3e2/0x454 [ 419.960532] ? bdev_name.constprop.0+0xce/0x243 [ 419.961129] ? __pfx_bdev_name.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [ 419.961799] ? pointer+0x3f0/0x62f [ 419.962277] ? __pfx_pointer+0x10/0x10 [ 419.962761] ? vsnprintf+0x6c4/0xfba [ 419.963178] ? __pfx_vsnprintf+0x10/0x10 [ 419.963621] ? setup_bdev_super+0x376/0x3b3 [ 419.964029] ? snprintf+0x9d/0xd2 [ 419.964344] ? __pfx_snprintf+0x10/0x10 [ 419.964675] ? lock_acquired+0x45c/0x5e9 [ 419.965016] ? set_blocksize+0x139/0x1c1 [ 419.965381] ? sb_set_blocksize+0x6d/0xae [ 419.965742] ? __pfx_hfsplus_fill_super+0x10/0x10 [ 419.966179] mount_bdev+0x12f/0x1bf [ 419.966512] ? __pfx_mount_bdev+0x10/0x10 [ 419.966886] ? vfs_parse_fs_string+0xce/0x111 [ 419.967293] ? __pfx_vfs_parse_fs_string+0x10/0x10 [ 419.967702] ? __pfx_hfsplus_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.968073] legacy_get_tree+0x104/0x178 [ 419.968414] vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x296 [ 419.968751] path_mount+0xba3/0xd0b [ 419.969157] ? __pfx_path_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.969594] ? kmem_cache_free+0x1e2/0x260 [ 419.970311] do_mount+0x99/0xe0 [ 419.970630] ? __pfx_do_mount+0x10/0x10 [ 419.971008] __do_sys_mount+0x199/0x1c9 [ 419.971397] do_syscall_64+0xd0/0x135 [ 419.971761] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 419.972233] RIP: 0033:0x7c3cb812972e [ 419.972564] Code: 48 8b 0d f5 46 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 a5 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c2 46 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 419.974371] RSP: 002b:00007ffe30632548 EFLAGS: 00000286 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a5 [ 419.975048] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe306328d8 RCX: 00007c3cb812972e [ 419.975701] RDX: 0000000020000000 RSI: 0000000020000c80 RDI: 00007ffe306325d0 [ 419.976363] RBP: 00007ffe30632720 R08: 00007ffe30632610 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 419.977034] R10: 0000000000200008 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 419.977713] R13: 00007ffe306328e8 R14: 00005a0eb298bc68 R15: 00007c3cb8356000 [ 419.978375] [ 419.978589] Fixes: 6596528e391a ("hfsplus: ensure bio requests are not smaller than the hardware sectors") Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107114109.839253-1-cascardo@igalia.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfsplus: fix to avoid false alarm of circular locking

2024-08-19T03:31:55+00:00

[ Upstream commit be4edd1642ee205ed7bbf66edc0453b1be1fb8d7 ] Syzbot report potential ABBA deadlock as below: loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1024 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-syzkaller-10323-g8f6a15f095a6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor171/5344 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807cb980b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x811/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:595 but task is already holding lock: ffff88807a930108 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x2da/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 hfsplus_file_extend+0x21b/0x1b70 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457 hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x105/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:358 hfsplus_rename_cat+0x1d0/0x1050 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:456 hfsplus_rename+0x12e/0x1c0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:552 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:4887 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5044 __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5091 [inline] __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:5089 [inline] __x64_sys_rename+0x86/0xa0 fs/namei.c:5089 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 hfsplus_file_truncate+0x811/0xb50 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:595 hfsplus_setattr+0x1ce/0x280 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:265 notify_change+0xb9d/0xe70 fs/attr.c:497 do_truncate+0x220/0x310 fs/open.c:65 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3308 [inline] do_open fs/namei.c:3654 [inline] path_openat+0x2a3d/0x3280 fs/namei.c:3807 do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3834 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1406 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1421 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1497 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1491 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0x123/0x170 fs/open.c:1491 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock); lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock); This is a false alarm as tree_lock mutex are different, one is from sbi->cat_tree, and another is from sbi->ext_tree: Thread A Thread B - hfsplus_rename - hfsplus_rename_cat - hfs_find_init - mutext_lock(cat_tree->tree_lock) - hfsplus_setattr - hfsplus_file_truncate - mutex_lock(hip->extents_lock) - hfs_find_init - mutext_lock(ext_tree->tree_lock) - hfs_bmap_reserve - hfsplus_file_extend - mutex_lock(hip->extents_lock) So, let's call mutex_lock_nested for tree_lock mutex lock, and pass correct lock class for it. Fixes: 31651c607151 ("hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation") Reported-by: syzbot+6030b3b1b9bf70e538c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/000000000000e37a4005ef129563@google.com Cc: Ernesto A. Fernández Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240607142304.455441-1-chao@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

hfsplus: fix uninit-value in copy_name

2024-07-27T08:33:43+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0570730c16307a72f8241df12363f76600baf57d ] [syzbot reported] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 sized_strscpy+0xc4/0x160 copy_name+0x2af/0x320 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:411 hfsplus_listxattr+0x11e9/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:750 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:3877 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3918 [inline] kmalloc_trace+0x57b/0xbe0 mm/slub.c:4065 kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:628 [inline] hfsplus_listxattr+0x4cc/0x1a50 fs/hfsplus/xattr.c:699 vfs_listxattr fs/xattr.c:493 [inline] listxattr+0x1f3/0x6b0 fs/xattr.c:840 path_listxattr fs/xattr.c:864 [inline] __do_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:876 [inline] __se_sys_listxattr fs/xattr.c:873 [inline] __x64_sys_listxattr+0x16b/0x2f0 fs/xattr.c:873 x64_sys_call+0x2ba0/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:195 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [Fix] When allocating memory to strbuf, initialize memory to 0. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+efde959319469ff8d4d7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_8BBB6433BC9E1C1B7B4BDF1BF52574BA8808@qq.com Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+01ade747b16e9c8030e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage

2023-08-11T09:45:01+00:00

commit 3f649ab728cda8038259d8f14492fe400fbab911 upstream. Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var$([^$]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200603174714.192027-1-glider@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fs: hfsplus: remove WARN_ON() from hfsplus_cat_{read,write}_inode()

2023-05-30T11:42:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit 81b21c0f0138ff5a499eafc3eb0578ad2a99622c ] syzbot is hitting WARN_ON() in hfsplus_cat_{read,write}_inode(), for crafted filesystem image can contain bogus length. There conditions are not kernel bugs that can justify kernel to panic. Reported-by: syzbot Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e2787430e752a92b8750 Reported-by: syzbot Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4913dca2ea6e4d43f3f1 Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Message-Id: <15308173-5252-d6a3-ae3b-e96d46cb6f41@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fs: hfsplus: fix UAF issue in hfsplus_put_super

2023-03-11T15:31:49+00:00

commit 07db5e247ab5858439b14dd7cc1fe538b9efcf32 upstream. The current hfsplus_put_super first calls hfs_btree_close on sbi->ext_tree, then invokes iput on sbi->hidden_dir, resulting in an use-after-free issue in hfsplus_release_folio. As shown in hfsplus_fill_super, the error handling code also calls iput before hfs_btree_close. To fix this error, we move all iput calls before hfsplus_btree_close. Note that this patch is tested on Syzbot. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230226124948.3175736-1-mudongliangabcd@gmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+57e3e98f7e3b80f64d56@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: Dongliang Mu Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu Cc: Bart Van Assche Cc: Jens Axboe Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfs/hfsplus: use WARN_ON for sanity check

2023-01-18T10:30:51+00:00

commit 55d1cbbbb29e6656c662ee8f73ba1fc4777532eb upstream. gcc warns about a couple of instances in which a sanity check exists but the author wasn't sure how to react to it failing, which makes it look like a possible bug: fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_read_inode': fs/hfsplus/inode.c:503:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 503 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c:524:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 524 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c: In function 'hfsplus_cat_write_inode': fs/hfsplus/inode.c:582:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 582 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfsplus/inode.c:608:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 608 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfs/inode.c: In function 'hfs_write_inode': fs/hfs/inode.c:464:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 464 | /* panic? */; | ^ fs/hfs/inode.c:485:37: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body] 485 | /* panic? */; | ^ panic() is probably not the correct choice here, but a WARN_ON seems appropriate and avoids the compile-time warning. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210927102149.1809384-1-arnd@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210322223249.2632268-1-arnd@kernel.org/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner Cc: Alexander Viro Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfsplus: fix bug causing custom uid and gid being unable to be assigned with mount

2023-01-18T10:30:40+00:00

commit 9f2b5debc07073e6dfdd774e3594d0224b991927 upstream. Despite specifying UID and GID in mount command, the specified UID and GID were not being assigned. This patch fixes this issue. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/C0264BF5-059C-45CF-B8DA-3A3BD2C803A2@live.com Signed-off-by: Aditya Garg Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfsplus: prevent corruption in shrinking truncate

2021-05-22T08:59:45+00:00

commit c3187cf32216313fb316084efac4dab3a8459b1d upstream. I believe there are some issues introduced by commit 31651c607151 ("hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation") HFS+ has extent records which always contains 8 extents. In case the first extent record in catalog file gets full, new ones are allocated from extents overflow file. In case shrinking truncate happens to middle of an extent record which locates in extents overflow file, the logic in hfsplus_file_truncate() was changed so that call to hfs_brec_remove() is not guarded any more. Right action would be just freeing the extents that exceed the new size inside extent record by calling hfsplus_free_extents(), and then check if the whole extent record should be removed. However since the guard (blk_cnt > start) is now after the call to hfs_brec_remove(), this has unfortunate effect that the last matching extent record is removed unconditionally. To reproduce this issue, create a file which has at least 10 extents, and then perform shrinking truncate into middle of the last extent record, so that the number of remaining extents is not under or divisible by 8. This causes the last extent record (8 extents) to be removed totally instead of truncating into middle of it. Thus this causes corruption, and lost data. Fix for this is simply checking if the new truncated end is below the start of this extent record, making it safe to remove the full extent record. However call to hfs_brec_remove() can't be moved to it's previous place since we're dropping ->tree_lock and it can cause a race condition and the cached info being invalidated possibly corrupting the node data. Another issue is related to this one. When entering into the block (blk_cnt > start) we are not holding the ->tree_lock. We break out from the loop not holding the lock, but hfs_find_exit() does unlock it. Not sure if it's possible for someone else to take the lock under our feet, but it can cause hard to debug errors and premature unlocking. Even if there's no real risk of it, the locking should still always be kept in balance. Thus taking the lock now just before the check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210429165139.3082828-1-jouni.roivas@tuxera.com Fixes: 31651c607151f ("hfsplus: avoid deadlock on file truncation") Signed-off-by: Jouni Roivas Reviewed-by: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Anatoly Trosinenko Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

hfsplus: fix crash and filesystem corruption when deleting files

2020-04-17T08:48:52+00:00

commit 25efb2ffdf991177e740b2f63e92b4ec7d310a92 upstream. When removing files containing extended attributes, the hfsplus driver may remove the wrong entries from the attributes b-tree, causing major filesystem damage and in some cases even kernel crashes. To remove a file, all its extended attributes have to be removed as well. The driver does this by looking up all keys in the attributes b-tree with the cnid of the file. Each of these entries then gets deleted using the key used for searching, which doesn't contain the attribute's name when it should. Since the key doesn't contain the name, the deletion routine will not find the correct entry and instead remove the one in front of it. If parent nodes have to be modified, these become corrupt as well. This causes invalid links and unsorted entries that not even macOS's fsck_hfs is able to fix. To fix this, modify the search key before an entry is deleted from the attributes b-tree by copying the found entry's key into the search key, therefore ensuring that the correct entry gets removed from the tree. Signed-off-by: Simon Gander Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327155541.1521-1-simon@tuxera.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman