<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/git/stable/linux.git/Documentation/networking/ewrk3.txt, branch master</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<id>https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/atom?h=master</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/atom?h=master'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2013-01-22T15:39:55+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>drivers/net: delete Digital EtherWorks-3 support.</title>
<updated>2013-01-22T15:39:55+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Gortmaker</name>
<email>paul.gortmaker@windriver.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-01-20T22:14:45+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=0ffd89e48fc10f9665b07615cde40b1775b24570'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0ffd89e48fc10f9665b07615cde40b1775b24570</id>
<content type='text'>
This is another one that makes sense to target for obsolescence, since
it (a)appeared pre-1995, and (b)was rather rare, and (c)did not
really have any statistically significant active linux user base.

Removing this ISA 10Mbit driver support is unlikely to be even noticed
by the user base of 3.9+ linux kernels, especially when the documentation
clearly indicates the vintage with this text:

	 "...designed to  work with all kernels &gt; 1.1.33"

Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker &lt;paul.gortmaker@windriver.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Linux-2.6.12-rc2</title>
<updated>2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Linus Torvalds</name>
<email>torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org</email>
</author>
<published>2005-04-16T22:20:36+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2'/>
<id>urn:sha1:1da177e4c3f41524e886b7f1b8a0c1fc7321cac2</id>
<content type='text'>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
