kernel/git/stable/linux.git/fs/btrfs/send.c, branch linux-5.5.y

Btrfs: send, fix emission of invalid clone operations within the same file

2020-02-11T12:37:04+00:00

commit 9722b10148504c4153a74a9c89725af271e490fc upstream. When doing an incremental send and a file has extents shared with itself at different file offsets, it's possible for send to emit clone operations that will fail at the destination because the source range goes beyond the file's current size. This happens when the file size has increased in the send snapshot, there is a hole between the shared extents and both shared extents are at file offsets which are greater the file's size in the parent snapshot. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt/sdb $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xf1 0 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/base $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdb/base # Create a 320K extent at file offset 512K. $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 512K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 576K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xef 640K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 704K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 768K 64K" /mnt/sdb/foobar # Clone part of that 320K extent into a lower file offset (192K). # This file offset is greater than the file's size in the parent # snapshot (64K). Also the clone range is a bit behind the offset of # the 320K extent so that we leave a hole between the shared extents. $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdb/foobar 448K 192K 192K" /mnt/sdb/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdb /mnt/sdb/incr $ btrfs send -p /mnt/sdb/base -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdb/incr $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/sdc $ btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/sdc ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument The problem is that after processing the extent at file offset 256K, which refers to the first 128K of the 320K extent created by the buffered write operations, we have 'cur_inode_next_write_offset' set to 384K, which corresponds to the end offset of the partially shared extent (256K + 128K) and to the current file size in the receiver. Then when we process the extent at offset 512K, we do extent backreference iteration to figure out if we can clone the extent from some other inode or from the same inode, and we consider the extent at offset 256K of the same inode as a valid source for a clone operation, which is not correct because at that point the current file size in the receiver is 384K, which corresponds to the end of last processed extent (at file offset 256K), so using a clone source range from 256K to 256K + 320K is invalid because that goes past the current size of the file (384K) - this makes the receiver get an -EINVAL error when attempting the clone operation. So fix this by excluding clone sources that have a range that goes beyond the current file size in the receiver when iterating extent backreferences. A test case for fstests follows soon. Fixes: 11f2069c113e02 ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: send: remove WARN_ON for readonly mount

2019-12-13T13:10:46+00:00

We log warning if root::orphan_cleanup_state is not set to ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE in btrfs_ioctl_send(). However if the filesystem is mounted as readonly we skip the orphan item cleanup during the lookup and root::orphan_cleanup_state remains at the init state 0 instead of ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE (2). So during send in btrfs_ioctl_send() we hit the warning as below. WARN_ON(send_root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE); WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2616 at /Volumes/ws/btrfs-devel/fs/btrfs/send.c:7090 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: RIP: 0010:btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: Call Trace: :: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x7b/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x150a/0x2b00 [btrfs] :: do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x620 ? __fget+0xac/0xe0 ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x49/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Reproducer: mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs subvolume create /btrfs/sv1 btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /btrfs/sv1 /btrfs/ss1 umount /btrfs mount -o ro /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs send /btrfs/ss1 -f /tmp/f The warning exists because having orphan inodes could confuse send and cause it to fail or produce incorrect streams. The two cases that would cause such send failures, which are already fixed are: 1) Inodes that were unlinked - these are orphanized and remain with a link count of 0. These caused send operations to fail because it expected to always find at least one path for an inode. However this is no longer a problem since send is now able to deal with such inodes since commit 46b2f4590aab ("Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open") and treats them as having been completely removed (the state after an orphan cleanup is performed). 2) Inodes that were in the process of being truncated. These resulted in send not knowing about the truncation and potentially issue write operations full of zeroes for the range from the new file size to the old file size. This is no longer a problem because we no longer create orphan items for truncation since commit f7e9e8fc792f ("Btrfs: stop creating orphan items for truncate"). As such before these commits, the WARN_ON here provided a clue in case something went wrong. Instead of being a warning against the root::orphan_cleanup_state value, it could have been more accurate by checking if there were actually any orphan items, and then issue a warning only if any exists, but that would be more expensive to check. Since orphanized inodes no longer cause problems for send, just remove the warning. Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/21cb5e8d059f6e1496a903fa7bfc0a297e2f5370.camel@scientia.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: send, skip backreference walking for extents with many references

2019-11-18T16:51:48+00:00

Backreference walking, which is used by send to figure if it can issue clone operations instead of write operations, can be very slow and use too much memory when extents have many references. This change simply skips backreference walking when an extent has more than 64 references, in which case we fallback to a write operation instead of a clone operation. This limit is conservative and in practice I observed no signicant slowdown with up to 100 references and still low memory usage up to that limit. This is a temporary workaround until there are speedups in the backref walking code, and as such it does not attempt to add extra interfaces or knobs to tweak the threshold. Reported-by: Atemu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAE4GHgkvqVADtS4AzcQJxo0Q1jKQgKaW3JGp3SGdoinVo=C9eQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#me55dc0987f9cc2acaa54372ce0492c65782be3fa CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file

2019-11-18T16:51:48+00:00

For send we currently skip clone operations when the source and destination files are the same. This is so because clone didn't support this case in its early days, but support for it was added back in May 2013 by commit a96fbc72884fcb ("Btrfs: allow file data clone within a file"). This change adds support for it. Example: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt/sdd $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 64K 0 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ xfs_io -c "reflink /mnt/sdd/foobar 0 64K 64K" /mnt/sdd/foobar $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sdd /mnt/sdd/snap $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sde $ mount /dev/sde /mnt/sde $ btrfs send /mnt/sdd/snap | btrfs receive /mnt/sde Without this change file foobar at the destination has a single 128Kb extent: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 31: 0.. 31: 32: last,unknown_loc,delalloc,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 1 extent found With this we get a single 64Kb extent that is shared at file offsets 0 and 64K, just like in the source filesystem: $ filefrag -v /mnt/sde/snap/foobar Filesystem type is: 9123683e File size of /mnt/sde/snap/foobar is 131072 (32 blocks of 4096 bytes) ext: logical_offset: physical_offset: length: expected: flags: 0: 0.. 15: 3328.. 3343: 16: shared 1: 16.. 31: 3328.. 3343: 16: 3344: last,shared,eof /mnt/sde/snap/foobar: 2 extents found Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: drop unused parameter is_new from btrfs_iget

2019-11-18T11:46:52+00:00

The parameter is now always set to NULL and could be dropped. The last user was get_default_root but that got reworked in 05dbe6837b60 ("Btrfs: unify subvol= and subvolid= mounting") and the parameter became unused. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: silence maybe-uninitialized warning in clone_range

2019-10-08T11:14:55+00:00

GCC throws warning message as below: ‘clone_src_i_size’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0) ^ fs/btrfs/send.c:5088:6: note: ‘clone_src_i_size’ was declared here u64 clone_src_i_size; ^ The clone_src_i_size is only used as call-by-reference in a call to get_inode_info(). Silence the warning by initializing clone_src_i_size to 0. Note that the warning is a false positive and reported by older versions of GCC (eg. 7.x) but not eg 9.x. As there have been numerous people, the patch is applied. Setting clone_src_i_size to 0 does not otherwise make sense and would not do any action in case the code changes in the future. Signed-off-by: Austin Kim Reviewed-by: David Sterba [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: Relinquish CPUs in btrfs_compare_trees

2019-09-09T12:59:20+00:00

When doing any form of incremental send the parent and the child trees need to be compared via btrfs_compare_trees. This can result in long loop chains without ever relinquishing the CPU. This causes softlockup detector to trigger when comparing trees with a lot of items. Example report: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 24s! [snapperd:16153] CPU: 0 PID: 16153 Comm: snapperd Not tainted 5.2.9-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO) pc : __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 lr : btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xe0/0x1e8 [btrfs] sp : ffff00001273b7e0 Call trace: __ll_sc_arch_atomic_sub_return+0x14/0x20 release_extent_buffer+0xdc/0x120 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer.part.0+0xb0/0x118 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] btrfs_release_path+0x4c/0xa0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path.part.0+0x20/0x40 [btrfs] btrfs_free_path+0x24/0x30 [btrfs] get_inode_info+0xa8/0xf8 [btrfs] finish_inode_if_needed+0xe0/0x6d8 [btrfs] changed_cb+0x9c/0x410 [btrfs] btrfs_compare_trees+0x284/0x648 [btrfs] send_subvol+0x33c/0x520 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x8a0/0xaf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x199c/0x2288 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4b0/0x820 ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8 __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x28/0x38 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x7c/0x188 el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90 el0_svc+0x8/0xc Fix this by adding a call to cond_resched at the beginning of the main loop in btrfs_compare_trees. Fixes: 7069830a9e38 ("Btrfs: add btrfs_compare_trees function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba

btrfs: move functions for tree compare to send.c

2019-09-09T12:59:15+00:00

Send is the only user of tree_compare, we can move it there along with the other helpers and definitions. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: fix incremental send failure after deduplication

2019-07-30T16:25:11+00:00

When doing an incremental send operation we can fail if we previously did deduplication operations against a file that exists in both snapshots. In that case we will fail the send operation with -EIO and print a message to dmesg/syslog like the following: BTRFS error (device sdc): Send: inconsistent snapshot, found updated \ extent for inode 257 without updated inode item, send root is 258, \ parent root is 257 This requires that we deduplicate to the same file in both snapshots for the same amount of times on each snapshot. The issue happens because a deduplication only updates the iversion of an inode and does not update any other field of the inode, therefore if we deduplicate the file on each snapshot for the same amount of time, the inode will have the same iversion value (stored as the "sequence" field on the inode item) on both snapshots, therefore it will be seen as unchanged between in the send snapshot while there are new/updated/deleted extent items when comparing to the parent snapshot. This makes the send operation return -EIO and print an error message. Example reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt # Create our first file. The first half of the file has several 64Kb # extents while the second half as a single 512Kb extent. $ xfs_io -f -s -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 -b 64K 0 512K" /mnt/foo $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 512K 512K" /mnt/foo # Create the base snapshot and the parent send stream from it. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap /mnt/mysnap1 # Create our second file, that has exactly the same data as the first # file. $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xb8 0 1M" /mnt/bar # Create the second snapshot, used for the incremental send, before # doing the file deduplication. $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 # Now before creating the incremental send stream: # # 1) Deduplicate into a subrange of file foo in snapshot mysnap1. This # will drop several extent items and add a new one, also updating # the inode's iversion (sequence field in inode item) by 1, but not # any other field of the inode; # # 2) Deduplicate into a different subrange of file foo in snapshot # mysnap2. This will replace an extent item with a new one, also # updating the inode's iversion by 1 but not any other field of the # inode. # # After these two deduplication operations, the inode items, for file # foo, are identical in both snapshots, but we have different extent # items for this inode in both snapshots. We want to check this doesn't # cause send to fail with an error or produce an incorrect stream. $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 0 0 512K" /mnt/mysnap1/foo $ xfs_io -r -c "dedupe /mnt/bar 512K 512K 512K" /mnt/mysnap2/foo # Create the incremental send stream. $ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap /mnt/mysnap2 ERROR: send ioctl failed with -5: Input/output error This issue started happening back in 2015 when deduplication was updated to not update the inode's ctime and mtime and update only the iversion. Back then we would hit a BUG_ON() in send, but later in 2016 send was updated to return -EIO and print the error message instead of doing the BUG_ON(). A test case for fstests follows soon. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203933 Fixes: 1c919a5e13702c ("btrfs: don't update mtime/ctime on deduped inodes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba

Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation

2019-07-02T10:30:49+00:00

Send always operates on read-only trees and always expected that while it is in progress, nothing changes in those trees. Due to that expectation and the fact that send is a read-only operation, it operates on commit roots and does not hold transaction handles. However relocation can COW nodes and leafs from read-only trees, which can cause unexpected failures and crashes (hitting BUG_ONs). while send using a node/leaf, it gets COWed, the transaction used to COW it is committed, a new transaction starts, the extent previously used for that node/leaf gets allocated, possibly for another tree, and the respective extent buffer' content changes while send is still using it. When this happens send normally fails with EIO being returned to user space and messages like the following are found in dmesg/syslog: [ 3408.699121] BTRFS error (device sdc): parent transid verify failed on 58703872 wanted 250 found 253 [ 3441.523123] BTRFS error (device sdc): did not find backref in send_root. inode=63211, offset=0, disk_byte=5222825984 found extent=5222825984 Other times, less often, we hit a BUG_ON() because an extent buffer that send is using used to be a node, and while send is still using it, it got COWed and got reused as a leaf while send is still using, producing the following trace: [ 3478.466280] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3478.466282] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1806! [ 3478.466965] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [ 3478.467635] CPU: 0 PID: 2165 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [ 3478.468311] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 3478.469681] RIP: 0010:read_node_slot+0x122/0x130 [btrfs] (...) [ 3478.471758] RSP: 0018:ffffa437826bfaa0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 3478.472457] RAX: ffff961416ed7000 RBX: 000000000000003d RCX: 0000000000000002 [ 3478.473151] RDX: 000000000000003d RSI: ffff96141e387408 RDI: ffff961599b30000 [ 3478.473837] RBP: ffffa437826bfb8e R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffa437826bfb8e [ 3478.474515] R10: ffffa437826bfa70 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9614385c8708 [ 3478.475186] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.475840] FS: 00007f8e0e9cc8c0(0000) GS:ffff9615b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 3478.476489] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 3478.477127] CR2: 00007f98b67a056e CR3: 0000000005df6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 [ 3478.477762] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 3478.478385] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 3478.479003] Call Trace: [ 3478.479600] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x49/0xc0 [ 3478.480202] tree_advance+0x173/0x1d0 [btrfs] [ 3478.480810] btrfs_compare_trees+0x30c/0x690 [btrfs] [ 3478.481388] ? process_extent+0x1280/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 3478.481954] btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1037/0x1270 [btrfs] [ 3478.482510] _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x80/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3478.483062] btrfs_ioctl+0x13fe/0x3120 [btrfs] [ 3478.483581] ? rq_clock_task+0x2e/0x60 [ 3478.484086] ? wake_up_new_task+0x1f3/0x370 [ 3478.484582] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.485075] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [ 3478.485552] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [ 3478.486016] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [ 3478.486467] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 3478.486911] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 3478.487337] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [ 3478.487751] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 3478.488159] RIP: 0033:0x7f8e0d7d4dd7 (...) [ 3478.489349] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf6fb4908 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ 3478.489742] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000105 RCX: 00007f8e0d7d4dd7 [ 3478.490142] RDX: 00007ffcf6fb4990 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.490548] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 00007f8e0d6f3700 R09: 00007f8e0d6f3700 [ 3478.490953] R10: 00007f8e0d6f39d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005 [ 3478.491343] R13: 00005624e0780020 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 (...) [ 3478.493352] ---[ end trace d5f537302be4f8c8 ]--- Another possibility, much less likely to happen, is that send will not fail but the contents of the stream it produces may not be correct. To avoid this, do not allow send and relocation (balance) to run in parallel. In the long term the goal is to allow for both to be able to run concurrently without any problems, but that will take a significant effort in development and testing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba