kernel/git/stable/linux.git/fs/btrfs, branch linux-6.7.y

btrfs: zoned: use zone aware sb location for scrub

2024-04-03T13:11:48+00:00

commit 74098a989b9c3370f768140b7783a7aaec2759b3 upstream. At the moment scrub_supers() doesn't grab the super block's location via the zoned device aware btrfs_sb_log_location() but via btrfs_sb_offset(). This leads to checksum errors on 'scrub' as we're not accessing the correct location of the super block. So use btrfs_sb_log_location() for getting the super blocks location on scrub. Reported-by: WA AM Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CANU2Z0EvUzfYxczLgGUiREoMndE9WdQnbaawV5Fv5gNXptPUKw@mail.gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: zoned: don't skip block groups with 100% zone unusable

2024-04-03T13:11:48+00:00

commit a8b70c7f8600bc77d03c0b032c0662259b9e615e upstream. Commit f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes. So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion step. In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix race in read_extent_buffer_pages()

2024-04-03T13:11:48+00:00

commit ef1e68236b9153c27cb7cf29ead0c532870d4215 upstream. There are reports from tree-checker that detects corrupted nodes, without any obvious pattern so possibly an overwrite in memory. After some debugging it turns out there's a race when reading an extent buffer the uptodate status can be missed. To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer, read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks: /* (1) */ if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags)) return 0; /* (2) */ if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags)) goto done; At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does /* (3) */ set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb); /* (4) */ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags); Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is a racey interleaving: Thread A | Thread B | Thread C ---------+----------+--------- (1) | | | (1) | (2) | | (3) | | (4) | | | (2) | | | (1) When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if it's been set, skip the unnecessary read. Fixes: d7172f52e993 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for extent_buffer reading") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f51a6d5d7432455a6a858d51b49ecac183e0bbc9.1706312914.git.wqu@suse.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c7241ea4-fcc6-48d2-98c8-b5ea790d6c89@gmx.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Tavian Barnes Reviewed-by: David Sterba [ minor update of changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: validate device maj:min during open

2024-04-03T13:11:48+00:00

commit 9f7eb8405dcbc79c5434821e9e3e92abe187ee8e upstream. Boris managed to create a device capable of changing its maj:min without altering its device path. Only multi-devices can be scanned. A device that gets scanned and remains in the btrfs kernel cache might end up with an incorrect maj:min. Despite the temp-fsid feature patch did not introduce this bug, it could lead to issues if the above multi-device is converted to a single device with a stale maj:min. Subsequently, attempting to mount the same device with the correct maj:min might mistake it for another device with the same fsid, potentially resulting in wrongly auto-enabling the temp-fsid feature. To address this, this patch validates the device's maj:min at the time of device open and updates it if it has changed since the last scan. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+ Fixes: a5b8a5f9f835 ("btrfs: support cloned-device mount capability") Reported-by: Boris Burkov Co-developed-by: Boris Burkov Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov # Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: do not skip re-registration for the mounted device

2024-04-03T13:11:45+00:00

commit d565fffa68560ac540bf3d62cc79719da50d5e7a upstream. There are reports that since version 6.7 update-grub fails to find the device of the root on systems without initrd and on a single device. This looks like the device name changed in the output of /proc/self/mountinfo: 6.5-rc5 working 18 1 0:16 / / rw,noatime - btrfs /dev/sda8 ... 6.7 not working: 17 1 0:15 / / rw,noatime - btrfs /dev/root ... and "update-grub" shows this error: /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for / (is /dev mounted?) This looks like it's related to the device name, but grub-probe recognizes the "/dev/root" path and tries to find the underlying device. However there's a special case for some filesystems, for btrfs in particular. The generic root device detection heuristic is not done and it all relies on reading the device infos by a btrfs specific ioctl. This ioctl returns the device name as it was saved at the time of device scan (in this case it's /dev/root). The change in 6.7 for temp_fsid to allow several single device filesystem to exist with the same fsid (and transparently generate a new UUID at mount time) was to skip caching/registering such devices. This also skipped mounted device. One step of scanning is to check if the device name hasn't changed, and if yes then update the cached value. This broke the grub-probe as it always read the device /dev/root and couldn't find it in the system. A temporary workaround is to create a symlink but this does not survive reboot. The right fix is to allow updating the device path of a mounted filesystem even if this is a single device one. In the fix, check if the device's major:minor number matches with the cached device. If they do, then we can allow the scan to happen so that device_list_add() can take care of updating the device path. The file descriptor remains unchanged. This does not affect the temp_fsid feature, the UUID of the mounted filesystem remains the same and the matching is based on device major:minor which is unique per mounted filesystem. This covers the path when the device (that exists for all mounted devices) name changes, updating /dev/root to /dev/sdx. Any other single device with filesystem and is not mounted is still skipped. Note that if a system is booted and initial mount is done on the /dev/root device, this will be the cached name of the device. Only after the command "btrfs device scan" it will change as it triggers the rename. The fix was verified by users whose systems were affected. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218353 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAKLYgeJ1tUuqLcsquwuFqjDXPSJpEiokrWK2gisPKDZLs8Y2TQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: bc27d6f0aa0e ("btrfs: scan but don't register device on single device filesystem") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.7+ Tested-by: Alex Romosan Tested-by: CHECK_1234543212345@protonmail.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking

2024-04-03T13:11:42+00:00

commit b0ad381fa7690244802aed119b478b4bdafc31dd upstream. While working on the patchset to remove extent locking I got a lockdep splat with fiemap and pagefaulting with my new extent lock replacement lock. This deadlock exists with our normal code, we just don't have lockdep annotations with the extent locking so we've never noticed it. Since we're copying the fiemap extent to user space on every iteration we have the chance of pagefaulting. Because we hold the extent lock for the entire range we could mkwrite into a range in the file that we have mmap'ed. This would deadlock with the following stack trace [<0>] lock_extent+0x28d/0x2f0 [<0>] btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x273/0x8a0 [<0>] do_page_mkwrite+0x50/0xb0 [<0>] do_fault+0xc1/0x7b0 [<0>] __handle_mm_fault+0x2fa/0x460 [<0>] handle_mm_fault+0xa4/0x330 [<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x1f4/0x800 [<0>] exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x1e0 [<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [<0>] rep_movs_alternative+0x33/0x70 [<0>] _copy_to_user+0x49/0x70 [<0>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc8/0x120 [<0>] emit_fiemap_extent+0x4d/0xa0 [<0>] extent_fiemap+0x7f8/0xad0 [<0>] btrfs_fiemap+0x49/0x80 [<0>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3e1/0xb50 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x1a0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 I wrote an fstest to reproduce this deadlock without my replacement lock and verified that the deadlock exists with our existing locking. To fix this simply don't take the extent lock for the entire duration of the fiemap. This is safe in general because we keep track of where we are when we're searching the tree, so if an ordered extent updates in the middle of our fiemap call we'll still emit the correct extents because we know what offset we were on before. The only place we maintain the lock is searching delalloc. Since the delalloc stuff can change during writeback we want to lock the extent range so we have a consistent view of delalloc at the time we're checking to see if we need to set the delalloc flag. With this patch applied we no longer deadlock with my testcase. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

btrfs: fix off-by-one chunk length calculation at contains_pending_extent()

2024-04-03T13:11:17+00:00

[ Upstream commit ae6bd7f9b46a29af52ebfac25d395757e2031d0d ] At contains_pending_extent() the value of the end offset of a chunk we found in the device's allocation state io tree is inclusive, so when we calculate the length we pass to the in_range() macro, we must sum 1 to the expression "physical_end - physical_offset". In practice the wrong calculation should be harmless as chunks sizes are never 1 byte and we should never have 1 byte ranges of unallocated space. Nevertheless fix the wrong calculation. Reported-by: Alex Lyakas Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAOcd+r30e-f4R-5x-S7sV22RJPe7+pgwherA6xqN2_qe7o4XTg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 1c11b63eff2a ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: qgroup: always free reserved space for extent records

2024-04-03T13:11:17+00:00

[ Upstream commit d139ded8b9cdb897bb9539eb33311daf9a177fd2 ] [BUG] If qgroup is marked inconsistent (e.g. caused by operations needing full subtree rescan, like creating a snapshot and assign to a higher level qgroup), btrfs would immediately start leaking its data reserved space. The following script can easily reproduce it: mkfs.btrfs -O quota -f $dev mount $dev $mnt btrfs subvolume create $mnt/subv1 btrfs qgroup create 1/0 $mnt # This snapshot creation would mark qgroup inconsistent, # as the ownership involves different higher level qgroup, thus # we have to rescan both source and snapshot, which can be very # time consuming, thus here btrfs just choose to mark qgroup # inconsistent, and let users to determine when to do the rescan. btrfs subv snapshot -i 1/0 $mnt/subv1 $mnt/snap1 # Now this write would lead to qgroup rsv leak. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64k" $mnt/file1 # And at unmount time, btrfs would report 64K DATA rsv space leaked. umount $mnt And we would have the following dmesg output for the unmount: BTRFS info (device dm-1): last unmount of filesystem 14a3d84e-f47b-4f72-b053-a8a36eef74d3 BTRFS warning (device dm-1): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 65536 [CAUSE] Since commit e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), we introduce a mode for btrfs qgroup to skip the timing consuming backref walk, if the qgroup is already inconsistent. But this skip also covered the data reserved freeing, thus the qgroup reserved space for each newly created data extent would not be freed, thus cause the leakage. [FIX] Make the data extent reserved space freeing mandatory. The qgroup reserved space handling is way cheaper compared to the backref walking part, and we always have the super sensitive leak detector, thus it's definitely worth to always free the qgroup reserved data space. Reported-by: Fabian Vogt Fixes: e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216196 Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve

2024-03-26T22:17:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ] At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report from KCSAN is the following: [653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs] [653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0: [653.314779] btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.315606] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs] [653.316421] btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs] [653.317242] btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs] [653.318060] btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs] [653.318879] btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs] [653.319702] __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs] [653.320538] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs] [653.321340] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs] [653.322140] flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs] [653.322958] btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.323781] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [653.323800] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [653.323817] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.323836] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.323855] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 [653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3: [653.323906] btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs] [653.324699] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs] [653.325494] btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs] [653.326280] __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs] [653.327064] btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [653.327849] walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs] [653.328633] walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs] [653.329418] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs] [653.330205] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs] [653.330995] cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs] [653.331781] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.331800] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.331818] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

btrfs: fix data races when accessing the reserved amount of block reserves

2024-03-26T22:17:54+00:00

[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ] At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is always updated while holding the spinlock. The reports from KCSAN are like the following: [117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs] [117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3: [117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs] [117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs] [117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs] [117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs] [117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs] [117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs] [117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs] [117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs] [117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0 [117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728 [117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs] [117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498 [117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150 [117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88 [117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210 [117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0 [117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98 [117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0: [117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs] [117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs] [117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs] [117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs] [117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin