kernel/git/stable/linux.git/fs/notify, branch linux-5.18.y

fanotify: refine the validation checks on non-dir inode mask

2022-07-07T15:54:57+00:00

commit 8698e3bab4dd7968666e84e111d0bfd17c040e77 upstream. Commit ceaf69f8eadc ("fanotify: do not allow setting dirent events in mask of non-dir") added restrictions about setting dirent events in the mask of a non-dir inode mark, which does not make any sense. For backward compatibility, these restictions were added only to new (v5.17+) APIs. It also does not make any sense to set the flags FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD or FAN_ONDIR in the mask of a non-dir inode. Add these flags to the dir-only restriction of the new APIs as well. Move the check of the dir-only flags for new APIs into the helper fanotify_events_supported(), which is only called for FAN_MARK_ADD, because there is no need to error on an attempt to remove the dir-only flags from non-dir inode. Fixes: ceaf69f8eadc ("fanotify: do not allow setting dirent events in mask of non-dir") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220627113224.kr2725conevh53u4@quack3.lan/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627174719.2838175-1-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fsnotify: consistent behavior for parent not watching children

2022-06-25T13:29:47+00:00

commit e730558adffb88a52e562db089e969ee9510184a upstream. The logic for handling events on child in groups that have a mark on the parent inode, but without FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag in the mask is duplicated in several places and inconsistent. Move the logic into the preparation of mark type iterator, so that the parent mark type will be excluded from all mark type iterations in that case. This results in several subtle changes of behavior, hopefully all desired changes of behavior, for example: - Group A has a mount mark with FS_MODIFY in mask - Group A has a mark with ignore mask that does not survive FS_MODIFY and does not watch children on directory D. - Group B has a mark with FS_MODIFY in mask that does watch children on directory D. - FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should not clear the ignore mask of group A, but before this change it does And if group A ignore mask was set to survive FS_MODIFY: - FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should be reported to group A on account of the mount mark, but before this change it is wrongly ignored Fixes: 2f02fd3fa13e ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir") Reported-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220314113337.j7slrb5srxukztje@quack3.lan/ Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511190213.831646-3-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fsnotify: introduce mark type iterator

2022-06-25T13:29:47+00:00

commit 14362a2541797cf9df0e86fb12dcd7950baf566e upstream. fsnotify_foreach_iter_mark_type() is used to reduce boilerplate code of iterating all marks of a specific group interested in an event by consulting the iterator report_mask. Use an open coded version of that iterator in fsnotify_iter_next() that collects all marks of the current iteration group without consulting the iterator report_mask. At the moment, the two iterator variants are the same, but this decoupling will allow us to exclude some of the group's marks from reporting the event, for example for event on child and inode marks on parent did not request to watch events on children. Fixes: 2f02fd3fa13e ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir") Reported-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511190213.831646-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

fsnotify: fix wrong lockdep annotations

2022-06-09T08:30:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit 623af4f538b5df9b416e1b82f720af7371b4c771 ] Commit 6960b0d909cd ("fsnotify: change locking order") changed some of the mark_mutex locks in direct reclaim path to use: mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); This change is explained: "...It uses nested locking to avoid deadlock in case we do the final iput() on an inode which still holds marks and thus would take the mutex again when calling fsnotify_inode_delete() in destroy_inode()." The problem is that the mutex_lock_nested() is not a nested lock at all. In fact, it has the opposite effect of preventing lockdep from warning about a very possible deadlock. Due to these wrong annotations, a deadlock that was introduced with nfsd filecache in kernel v5.4 went unnoticed in v5.4.y for over two years until it was reported recently by Khazhismel Kumykov, only to find out that the deadlock was already fixed in kernel v5.5. Fix the wrong lockdep annotations. Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov Fixes: 6960b0d909cd ("fsnotify: change locking order") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220321112310.vpr7oxro2xkz5llh@quack3.lan/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-4-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

inotify: show inotify mask flags in proc fdinfo

2022-06-09T08:30:02+00:00

[ Upstream commit a32e697cda27679a0327ae2cafdad8c7170f548f ] The inotify mask flags IN_ONESHOT and IN_EXCL_UNLINK are not "internal to kernel" and should be exposed in procfs fdinfo so CRIU can restore them. Fixes: 6933599697c9 ("inotify: hide internal kernel bits from fdinfo") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fanotify: fix incorrect fmode_t casts

2022-06-09T08:29:52+00:00

[ Upstream commit dccd855771b37820b6d976a99729c88259549f85 ] Fixes sparce warnings: fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:267:63: sparse: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:1351:28: sparse: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer FMODE_NONTIFY have bitwise fmode_t type and requires __force attribute for any casts. Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9adfd6ac-1b89-791e-796b-49ada3293985@openvz.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

fanotify: do not allow setting dirent events in mask of non-dir

2022-05-09T09:49:09+00:00

Dirent events (create/delete/move) are only reported on watched directory inodes, but in fanotify as well as in legacy inotify, it was always allowed to set them on non-dir inode, which does not result in any meaningful outcome. Until kernel v5.17, dirent events in fanotify also differed from events "on child" (e.g. FAN_OPEN) in the information provided in the event. For example, FAN_OPEN could be set in the mask of a non-dir or the mask of its parent and event would report the fid of the child regardless of the marked object. By contrast, FAN_DELETE is not reported if the child is marked and the child fid was not reported in the events. Since kernel v5.17, with fanotify group flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID, the fid of the child is reported with dirent events, like events "on child", which may create confusion for users expecting the same behavior as events "on child" when setting events in the mask on a child. The desired semantics of setting dirent events in the mask of a child are not clear, so for now, deny this action for a group initialized with flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID and for the new event FAN_RENAME. We may relax this restriction in the future if we decide on the semantics and implement them. Fixes: d61fd650e9d2 ("fanotify: introduce group flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID") Fixes: 8cc3b1ccd930 ("fanotify: wire up FAN_RENAME event") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220505133057.zm5t6vumc4xdcnsg@quack3.lan/ Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220507080028.219826-1-amir73il@gmail.com

fsnotify: remove redundant parameter judgment

2022-03-14T08:05:25+00:00

iput() has already judged the incoming parameter, so there is no need to repeat the judgment here. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220311151240.62045-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Bang Li Signed-off-by: Jan Kara

fsnotify: optimize FS_MODIFY events with no ignored masks

2022-02-24T13:05:18+00:00

fsnotify() treats FS_MODIFY events specially - it does not skip them even if the FS_MODIFY event does not apear in the object's fsnotify mask. This is because send_to_group() checks if FS_MODIFY needs to clear ignored mask of marks. The common case is that an object does not have any mark with ignored mask and in particular, that it does not have a mark with ignored mask and without the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag. Set FS_MODIFY in object's fsnotify mask during fsnotify_recalc_mask() if object has a mark with an ignored mask and without the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag and remove the special treatment of FS_MODIFY in fsnotify(), so that FS_MODIFY events could be optimized in the common case. Call fsnotify_recalc_mask() from fanotify after adding or removing an ignored mask from a mark without FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY or when adding the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag to a mark with ignored mask (the flag cannot be removed by fanotify uapi). Performance results for doing 10000000 write(2)s to tmpfs: vanilla patched without notification mark 25.486+-1.054 24.965+-0.244 with notification mark 30.111+-0.139 26.891+-1.355 So we can see the overhead of notification subsystem has been drastically reduced. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220223151438.790268-3-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara

fsnotify: fix merge with parent's ignored mask

2022-02-24T13:04:51+00:00

fsnotify_parent() does not consider the parent's mark at all unless the parent inode shows interest in events on children and in the specific event. So unless parent added an event to both its mark mask and ignored mask, the event will not be ignored. Fix this by declaring the interest of an object in an event when the event is in either a mark mask or ignored mask. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220223151438.790268-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Jan Kara