kernel/git/stable/linux.git/fs/ufs, branch linux-4.13.y

Merge tag 'for-linus-v4.13-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux

2017-07-08T01:39:15+00:00

Pull Writeback error handling fixes from Jeff Layton: "The main rationale for all of these changes is to tighten up writeback error reporting to userland. There are many ways now that writeback errors can be lost, such that fsync/fdatasync/msync return 0 when writeback actually failed. This pile contains a small set of cleanups and writeback error handling fixes that I was able to break off from the main pile (#2). Two of the patches in this pile are trivial. The exceptions are the patch to fix up error handling in write_one_page, and the patch to make JFS pay attention to write_one_page errors" * tag 'for-linus-v4.13-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux: fs: remove call_fsync helper function mm: clean up error handling in write_one_page JFS: do not ignore return code from write_one_page() mm: drop "wait" parameter from write_one_page()

mm: drop "wait" parameter from write_one_page()

2017-07-05T22:44:22+00:00

The callers all set it to 1. Also, make it clear that this function will not set any sort of AS_* error, and that the caller must do so if necessary. No existing caller uses this on normal files, so none of them need it. Also, add __must_check here since, in general, the callers need to handle an error here in some fashion. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170525103303.6524-1-jlayton@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler Reviewed-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

Merge branch 'ufs-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2017-06-21T18:30:52+00:00

Pull more ufs fixes from Al Viro: "More UFS fixes, unfortunately including build regression fix for the 64-bit s_dsize commit. Fixed in this pile: - trivial bug in signedness of 32bit timestamps on ufs1 - ESTALE instead of ufs_error() when doing open-by-fhandle on something deleted - build regression on 32bit in ufs_new_fragments() - calculating that many percents of u64 pulls libgcc stuff on some of those. Mea culpa. - fix hysteresis loop broken by typo in 2.4.14.7 (right next to the location of previous bug). - fix the insane limits of said hysteresis loop on filesystems with very low percentage of reserved blocks. If it's 5% or less, just use the OPTSPACE policy. - calculate those limits once and mount time. This tree does pass xfstests clean (both ufs1 and ufs2) and it _does_ survive cross-builds. Again, my apologies for missing that, especially since I have noticed a related percentage-of-64bit issue in earlier patches (when dealing with amount of reserved blocks). Self-LART applied..." * 'ufs-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: ufs: fix the logics for tail relocation ufs_iget(): fail with -ESTALE on deleted inode fix signedness of timestamps on ufs1

ufs: fix the logics for tail relocation

2017-06-17T21:22:42+00:00

* original hysteresis loop got broken by typo back in 2002; now it never switches out of OPTTIME state. Fixed. * critical levels for switching from OPTTIME to OPTSPACE and back ought to be calculated once, at mount time. * we should use mul_u64_u32_div() for those calculations, now that ->s_dsize is 64bit. * to quote Kirk McKusick (in 1995 FreeBSD commit message): The threshold for switching from time-space and space-time is too small when minfree is 5%...so make it stay at space in this case. Signed-off-by: Al Viro

ufs_iget(): fail with -ESTALE on deleted inode

2017-06-17T16:25:58+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

fix signedness of timestamps on ufs1

2017-06-17T16:25:13+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

Merge branch 'ufs-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs

2017-06-17T08:30:07+00:00

Pull ufs fixes from Al Viro: "Fix assorted ufs bugs: a couple of deadlocks, fs corruption in truncate(), oopsen on tail unpacking and truncate when racing with vmscan, mild fs corruption (free blocks stats summary buggered, *BSD fsck would complain and fix), several instances of broken logics around reserved blocks (starting with "check almost never triggers when it should" and then there are issues with sufficiently large UFS2)" [ Note: ufs hasn't gotten any loving in a long time, because nobody really seems to use it. These ufs fixes are triggered by people actually caring now, not some sudden influx of new bugs. - Linus ] * 'ufs-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: ufs_truncate_blocks(): fix the case when size is in the last direct block ufs: more deadlock prevention on tail unpacking ufs: avoid grabbing ->truncate_mutex if possible ufs_get_locked_page(): make sure we have buffer_heads ufs: fix s_size/s_dsize users ufs: fix reserved blocks check ufs: make ufs_freespace() return signed ufs: fix logics in "ufs: make fsck -f happy"

ufs_truncate_blocks(): fix the case when size is in the last direct block

2017-06-15T07:57:46+00:00

The logics when deciding whether we need to do anything with direct blocks is broken when new size is within the last direct block. It's better to find the path to the last byte _not_ to be removed and use that instead of the path to the beginning of the first block to be freed... Signed-off-by: Al Viro

ufs: more deadlock prevention on tail unpacking

2017-06-15T04:42:56+00:00

->s_lock is not needed for ufs_change_blocknr() Signed-off-by: Al Viro

ufs: avoid grabbing ->truncate_mutex if possible

2017-06-15T04:41:18+00:00

tail unpacking is done in a wrong place; the deadlocks galore is best dealt with by doing that in ->write_iter() (and switching to iomap, while we are at it), but that's rather painful to backport. The trouble comes from grabbing pages that cover the beginning of tail from inside of ufs_new_fragments(); ongoing pageout of any of those is going to deadlock on ->truncate_mutex with process that got around to extending the tail holding that and waiting for page to get unlocked, while ->writepage() on that page is waiting on ->truncate_mutex. The thing is, we don't need ->truncate_mutex when the fragment we are trying to map is within the tail - the damn thing is allocated (tail can't contain holes). Let's do a plain lookup and if the fragment is present, we can just pretend that we'd won the race in almost all cases. The only exception is a fragment between the end of tail and the end of block containing tail. Protect ->i_lastfrag with ->meta_lock - read_seqlock_excl() is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Al Viro