<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>kernel/git/stable/linux.git/include/acpi/acpredef.h, branch linux-2.6.28.y</title>
<subtitle>Linux kernel stable tree</subtitle>
<id>https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/atom?h=linux-2.6.28.y</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/atom?h=linux-2.6.28.y'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2008-11-27T07:17:30+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>ACPICA: disable _BIF warning</title>
<updated>2008-11-27T07:17:30+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Lin Ming</name>
<email>ming.m.lin@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2008-11-27T06:42:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=e899b6485c332aa2d7510739507ab5e5d7b28e59'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e899b6485c332aa2d7510739507ab5e5d7b28e59</id>
<content type='text'>
A generic work-around from ACPICA is in the queue,
but since Linux has a work-around in its battery
driver, we can disable this warning now.

Allow _BIF method to return an Package with Buffer elements

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822

Signed-off-by: Lin Ming &lt;ming.m.lin@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Len Brown &lt;len.brown@intel.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPICA: Allow _WAK method to return an Integer</title>
<updated>2008-11-27T06:55:13+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Bob Moore</name>
<email>robert.moore@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2008-11-13T03:01:34+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=95a28ed08619cc70f31611886ac7b26ab0e462dc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:95a28ed08619cc70f31611886ac7b26ab0e462dc</id>
<content type='text'>
This can happen if the _WAK method returns nothing (as per ACPI
1.0) but does return an integer if the implicit return mechanism
is enabled.  This is the only method that has this problem,
since it is also defined to return a package of two integers
(ACPI 1.0b+). In all other cases, if a method returns an object
when one was not expected, no warning is issued.

Signed-off-by: Bob Moore &lt;robert.moore@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming &lt;ming.m.lin@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Len Brown &lt;len.brown@intel.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ACPICA: New: Validation for predefined ACPI methods/objects</title>
<updated>2008-10-23T03:14:49+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Bob Moore</name>
<email>robert.moore@intel.com</email>
</author>
<published>2008-09-28T07:26:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.rulkc.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=e8707b340fb5b6313cde784b944a568dfd770ddd'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e8707b340fb5b6313cde784b944a568dfd770ddd</id>
<content type='text'>
Validates predefined ACPI objects that appear in the namespace,
at the time they are evaluated. The argument count and the type of
the returned object are validated. The purpose of this validation
is to detect problems with the BIOS-exposed predefined ACPI objects
before the results are returned to the ACPI-related drivers.

Signed-off-by: Bob Moore &lt;robert.moore@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming &lt;ming.m.lin@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Len Brown &lt;len.brown@intel.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
