kernel/git/stable/linux.git/net/can, branch linux-5.4.y

can: j1939: j1939_local_ecu_get(): undo increment when j1939_local_ecu_get() fails

2025-10-02T11:34:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit 06e02da29f6f1a45fc07bd60c7eaf172dc21e334 ] Since j1939_sk_bind() and j1939_sk_release() call j1939_local_ecu_put() when J1939_SOCK_BOUND was already set, but the error handling path for j1939_sk_bind() will not set J1939_SOCK_BOUND when j1939_local_ecu_get() fails, j1939_local_ecu_get() needs to undo priv->ents[sa].nusers++ when j1939_local_ecu_get() returns an error. Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Link: https://patch.msgid.link/e7f80046-4ff7-4ce2-8ad8-7c3c678a42c9@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: j1939: j1939_sk_bind(): call j1939_priv_put() immediately when j1939_local_ecu_get() failed

2025-10-02T11:34:29+00:00

[ Upstream commit f214744c8a27c3c1da6b538c232da22cd027530e ] Commit 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct callback") expects that a call to j1939_priv_put() can be unconditionally delayed until j1939_sk_sock_destruct() is called. But a refcount leak will happen when j1939_sk_bind() is called again after j1939_local_ecu_get() from previous j1939_sk_bind() call returned an error. We need to call j1939_priv_put() before j1939_sk_bind() returns an error. Fixes: 25fe97cb7620 ("can: j1939: move j1939_priv_put() into sk_destruct callback") Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Link: https://patch.msgid.link/4f49a1bc-a528-42ad-86c0-187268ab6535@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: bcm: add missing rcu read protection for procfs content

2025-06-04T12:32:35+00:00

commit dac5e6249159ac255dad9781793dbe5908ac9ddb upstream. When the procfs content is generated for a bcm_op which is in the process to be removed the procfs output might show unreliable data (UAF). As the removal of bcm_op's is already implemented with rcu handling this patch adds the missing rcu_read_lock() and makes sure the list entries are properly removed under rcu protection. Fixes: f1b4e32aca08 ("can: bcm: use call_rcu() instead of costly synchronize_rcu()") Reported-by: Anderson Nascimento Suggested-by: Anderson Nascimento Tested-by: Anderson Nascimento Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250519125027.11900-2-socketcan@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # >= 5.4 Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

can: bcm: add locking for bcm_op runtime updates

2025-06-04T12:32:35+00:00

commit c2aba69d0c36a496ab4f2e81e9c2b271f2693fd7 upstream. The CAN broadcast manager (CAN BCM) can send a sequence of CAN frames via hrtimer. The content and also the length of the sequence can be changed resp reduced at runtime where the 'currframe' counter is then set to zero. Although this appeared to be a safe operation the updates of 'currframe' can be triggered from user space and hrtimer context in bcm_can_tx(). Anderson Nascimento created a proof of concept that triggered a KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read access which can be prevented with a spin_lock_bh. At the rework of bcm_can_tx() the 'count' variable has been moved into the protected section as this variable can be modified from both contexts too. Fixes: ffd980f976e7 ("[CAN]: Add broadcast manager (bcm) protocol") Reported-by: Anderson Nascimento Tested-by: Anderson Nascimento Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250519125027.11900-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

can: statistics: use atomic access in hot path

2025-04-10T12:29:42+00:00

[ Upstream commit 80b5f90158d1364cbd80ad82852a757fc0692bf2 ] In can_send() and can_receive() CAN messages and CAN filter matches are counted to be visible in the CAN procfs files. KCSAN detected a data race within can_send() when two CAN frames have been generated by a timer event writing to the same CAN netdevice at the same time. Use atomic operations to access the statistics in the hot path to fix the KCSAN complaint. Reported-by: syzbot+78ce4489b812515d5e4d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/67cd717d.050a0220.e1a89.0006.GAE@google.com Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250310143353.3242-1-socketcan@hartkopp.net Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: j1939: j1939_sk_send_loop(): fix unable to send messages with data length zero

2025-03-13T11:43:16+00:00

commit 44de577e61ed239db09f0da9d436866bef9b77dd upstream. The J1939 standard requires the transmission of messages of length 0. For example proprietary messages are specified with a data length of 0 to 1785. The transmission of such messages is not possible. Sending results in no error being returned but no corresponding can frame being generated. Enable the transmission of zero length J1939 messages. In order to facilitate this two changes are necessary: 1) If the transmission of a new message is requested from user space the message is segmented in j1939_sk_send_loop(). Let the segmentation take into account zero length messages, do not terminate immediately, queue the corresponding skb. 2) j1939_session_skb_get_by_offset() selects the next skb to transmit for a session. Take into account that there might be zero length skbs in the queue. Signed-off-by: Alexander Hölzl Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250205174651.103238-1-alexander.hoelzl@gmx.net Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [mkl: commit message rephrased] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

net: af_can: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in can_create()

2024-12-14T18:44:51+00:00

[ Upstream commit 811a7ca7320c062e15d0f5b171fe6ad8592d1434 ] On error can_create() frees the allocated sk object, but sock_init_data() has already attached it to the provided sock object. This will leave a dangling sk pointer in the sock object and may cause use-after-free later. Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241014153808.51894-5-ignat@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: j1939: j1939_session_new(): fix skb reference counting

2024-12-14T18:44:45+00:00

[ Upstream commit a8c695005bfe6569acd73d777ca298ddddd66105 ] Since j1939_session_skb_queue() does an extra skb_get() for each new skb, do the same for the initial one in j1939_session_new() to avoid refcount underflow. Reported-by: syzbot+d4e8dc385d9258220c31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d4e8dc385d9258220c31 Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241105094823.2403806-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru [mkl: clean up commit message] Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: bcm: Clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry().

2024-11-08T15:20:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit 94b0818fa63555a65f6ba107080659ea6bcca63e ] syzbot reported a warning in bcm_release(). [0] The blamed change fixed another warning that is triggered when connect() is issued again for a socket whose connect()ed device has been unregistered. However, if the socket is just close()d without the 2nd connect(), the remaining bo->bcm_proc_read triggers unnecessary remove_proc_entry() in bcm_release(). Let's clear bo->bcm_proc_read after remove_proc_entry() in bcm_notify(). [0] name '4986' WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5234 at fs/proc/generic.c:711 remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5234 Comm: syz-executor606 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-syzkaller-00178-g5517ae241919 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 08/06/2024 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x2e7/0x5d0 fs/proc/generic.c:711 Code: ff eb 05 e8 cb 1e 5e ff 48 8b 5c 24 10 48 c7 c7 e0 f7 aa 8e e8 2a 38 8e 09 90 48 c7 c7 60 3a 1b 8c 48 89 de e8 da 42 20 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 48 8b 44 24 18 48 c7 44 24 40 0e 36 e0 45 49 c7 04 07 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000345fa20 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 2a2d0aee2eb64600 RBX: ffff888032f1f548 RCX: ffff888029431e00 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc9000345fb08 R08: ffffffff8155b2f2 R09: 1ffff1101710519a R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed101710519b R12: ffff888011d38640 R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b8800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fcfb52722f0 CR3: 000000000e734000 CR4: 00000000003506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: bcm_release+0x250/0x880 net/can/bcm.c:1578 __sock_release net/socket.c:659 [inline] sock_close+0xbc/0x240 net/socket.c:1421 __fput+0x24a/0x8a0 fs/file_table.c:422 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:40 [inline] do_exit+0xa2f/0x27f0 kernel/exit.c:882 do_group_exit+0x207/0x2c0 kernel/exit.c:1031 __do_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1042 [inline] __se_sys_exit_group kernel/exit.c:1040 [inline] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x3f/0x40 kernel/exit.c:1040 x64_sys_call+0x2634/0x2640 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:232 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fcfb51ee969 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0x7fcfb51ee93f. RSP: 002b:00007ffce0109ca8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000e7 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007fcfb51ee969 RDX: 000000000000003c RSI: 00000000000000e7 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R08: ffffffffffffffb8 R09: 0000555500000000 R10: 0000555500000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fcfb526f3b0 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fcfb5271ee0 R15: 00007fcfb51bf160 Fixes: 76fe372ccb81 ("can: bcm: Remove proc entry when dev is unregistered.") Reported-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=0532ac7a06fb1a03187e Tested-by: syzbot+0532ac7a06fb1a03187e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240905012237.79683-1-kuniyu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

can: j1939: use correct function name in comment

2024-11-08T15:20:27+00:00

[ Upstream commit dc2ddcd136fe9b6196a7dd01f75f824beb02d43f ] The function j1939_cancel_all_active_sessions() was renamed to j1939_cancel_active_session() but name in comment wasn't updated. Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong Acked-by: Oleksij Rempel Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol") Link: https://patch.msgid.link/1724935703-44621-1-git-send-email-zhangchangzhong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin