kernel/git/stable/linux.git/net/rds/send.c, branch linux-4.1.y

RDS: RDMA: return appropriate error on rdma map failures

2017-12-08T23:01:08+00:00

[ Upstream commit 584a8279a44a800dea5a5c1e9d53a002e03016b4 ] The first message to a remote node should prompt a new connection even if it is RDMA operation. For RDMA operation the MR mapping can fail because connections is not yet up. Since the connection establishment is asynchronous, we make sure the map failure because of unavailable connection reach to the user by appropriate error code. Before returning to the user, lets trigger the connection so that its ready for the next retry. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

RDS: RDMA: Fix the composite message user notification

2017-11-06T04:54:13+00:00

[ Upstream commit 941f8d55f6d613a460a5e080d25a38509f45eb75 ] When application sends an RDS RDMA composite message consist of RDMA transfer to be followed up by non RDMA payload, it expect to be notified *only* when the full message gets delivered. RDS RDMA notification doesn't behave this way though. Thanks to Venkat for debug and root casuing the issue where only first part of the message(RDMA) was successfully delivered but remainder payload delivery failed. In that case, application should not be notified with a false positive of message delivery success. Fix this case by making sure the user gets notified only after the full message delivery. Reviewed-by: Venkat Venkatsubra Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

RDS: fix race condition when sending a message on unbound socket

2015-12-15T05:24:32+00:00

[ Upstream commit 8c7188b23474cca017b3ef354c4a58456f68303a ] Sasha's found a NULL pointer dereference in the RDS connection code when sending a message to an apparently unbound socket. The problem is caused by the code checking if the socket is bound in rds_sendmsg(), which checks the rs_bound_addr field without taking a lock on the socket. This opens a race where rs_bound_addr is temporarily set but where the transport is not in rds_bind(), leading to a NULL pointer dereference when trying to dereference 'trans' in __rds_conn_create(). Vegard wrote a reproducer for this issue, so kindly ask him to share if you're interested. I cannot reproduce the NULL pointer dereference using Vegard's reproducer with this patch, whereas I could without. Complete earlier incomplete fix to CVE-2015-6937: 74e98eb08588 ("RDS: verify the underlying transport exists before creating a connection") Cc: David S. Miller Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Vegard Nossum Reviewed-by: Sasha Levin Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar Signed-off-by: Quentin Casasnovas Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net

2015-04-14T19:44:14+00:00

The dwmac-socfpga.c conflict was a case of a bug fix overlapping changes in net-next to handle an error pointer differently. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

RDS: make sure not to loop forever inside rds_send_xmit

2015-04-08T19:17:32+00:00

If a determined set of concurrent senders keep the send queue full, we can loop forever inside rds_send_xmit. This fix has two parts. First we are dropping out of the while(1) loop after we've processed a large batch of messages. Second we add a generation number that gets bumped each time the xmit bit lock is acquired. If someone else has jumped in and made progress in the queue, we skip our goto restart. Original patch by Chris Mason. Signed-off-by: Sowmini Varadhan Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: Remove iocb argument from sendmsg and recvmsg

2015-03-02T18:06:31+00:00

After TIPC doesn't depend on iocb argument in its internal implementations of sendmsg() and recvmsg() hooks defined in proto structure, no any user is using iocb argument in them at all now. Then we can drop the redundant iocb argument completely from kinds of implementations of both sendmsg() and recvmsg() in the entire networking stack. Cc: Christoph Hellwig Suggested-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Ying Xue Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

net: introduce helper macro for_each_cmsghdr

2014-12-11T03:41:55+00:00

Introduce helper macro for_each_cmsghdr as a wrapper of the enumerating cmsghdr from msghdr, just cleanup. Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

put iov_iter into msghdr

2014-12-09T21:29:03+00:00

Note that the code _using_ ->msg_iter at that point will be very unhappy with anything other than unshifted iovec-backed iov_iter. We still need to convert users to proper primitives. Signed-off-by: Al Viro

rds: switch rds_message_copy_from_user() to iov_iter

2014-11-24T10:16:43+00:00

Signed-off-by: Al Viro

net/rds: fix possible double free on sock tear down

2014-10-03T19:52:00+00:00

I got a report of a double free happening at RDS slab cache. One suspicion was that may be somewhere we were doing a sock_hold/sock_put on an already freed sock. Thus after providing a kernel with the following change: static inline void sock_hold(struct sock *sk) { - atomic_inc(&sk->sk_refcnt); + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt)) + WARN(1, "Trying to hold sock already gone: %p (family: %hd)\n", + sk, sk->sk_family); } The warning successfuly triggered: Trying to hold sock already gone: ffff81f6dda61280 (family: 21) WARNING: at include/net/sock.h:350 sock_hold() Call Trace: [] :rds:rds_send_remove_from_sock+0xf0/0x21b [] :rds:rds_send_drop_acked+0xbf/0xcf [] :rds_rdma:rds_ib_recv_tasklet_fn+0x256/0x2dc [] tasklet_action+0x8f/0x12b [] __do_softirq+0x89/0x133 [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x28 [] do_softirq+0x2c/0x7d [] do_IRQ+0xee/0xf7 [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0xa Looking at the call chain above, the only way I think this would be possible is if somewhere we already released the same socket->sock which is assigned to the rds_message at rds_send_remove_from_sock. Which seems only possible to happen after the tear down done on rds_release. rds_release properly calls rds_send_drop_to to drop the socket from any rds_message, and some proper synchronization is in place to avoid race with rds_send_drop_acked/rds_send_remove_from_sock. However, I still see a very narrow window where it may be possible we touch a sock already released: when rds_release races with rds_send_drop_acked, we check RDS_MSG_ON_CONN to avoid cleanup on the same rds_message, but in this specific case we don't clear rm->m_rs. In this case, it seems we could then go on at rds_send_drop_to and after it returns, the sock is freed by last sock_put on rds_release, with concurrently we being at rds_send_remove_from_sock; then at some point in the loop at rds_send_remove_from_sock we process an rds_message which didn't have rm->m_rs unset for a freed sock, and a possible sock_hold on an sock already gone at rds_release happens. This hopefully address the described condition above and avoids a double free on "second last" sock_put. In addition, I removed the comment about socket destruction on top of rds_send_drop_acked: we call rds_send_drop_to in rds_release and we should have things properly serialized there, thus I can't see the comment being accurate there. Signed-off-by: Herton R. Krzesinski Signed-off-by: David S. Miller