kernel/git/stable/linux.git/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c, branch linux-4.17.y

rxrpc: remove redundant initialization of variable 'len'

2018-03-16T13:48:39+00:00

The variable 'len' is being initialized with a value that is never read and it is re-assigned later, hence the initialization is redundant and can be removed. Cleans up clang warning: net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:275:15: warning: Value stored to 'len' during its initialization is never read Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Work around usercopy check

2018-02-16T21:22:27+00:00

Due to a check recently added to copy_to_user(), it's now not permitted to copy from slab-held data to userspace unless the slab is whitelisted. This affects rxrpc_recvmsg() when it attempts to place an RXRPC_USER_CALL_ID control message in the userspace control message buffer. A warning is generated by usercopy_warn() because the source is the copy of the user_call_ID retained in the rxrpc_call struct. Work around the issue by copying the user_call_ID to a variable on the stack and passing that to put_cmsg(). The warning generated looks like: Bad or missing usercopy whitelist? Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object 'dmaengine-unmap-128' (offset 680, size 8)! WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1401 at mm/usercopy.c:81 usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... RIP: 0010:usercopy_warn+0x7e/0xa0 ... Call Trace: __check_object_size+0x9c/0x1a0 put_cmsg+0x98/0x120 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6fc/0x1010 [rxrpc] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80 ___sys_recvmsg+0xf8/0x240 ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x25/0x3d ? __clear_rsb+0x15/0x3d ? finish_task_switch+0xa6/0x2b0 ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xed/0x180 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x40 ? __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 __sys_recvmsg+0x4e/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x220 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x26/0x9b Reported-by: Jonathan Billings Signed-off-by: David Howells Acked-by: Kees Cook Tested-by: Jonathan Billings Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Add a timeout for detecting lost ACKs/lost DATA

2017-11-24T10:18:42+00:00

Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that has the request-ack flag set. This allows us to detect if we don't get an ACK in response to the latest flagged packet. The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within 2*RTT of the transmission. If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out the state of the other side. If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner, we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that instead. If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have been lost and retransmit immediately. Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set. It should result in either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Don't transmit DELAY ACKs immediately on proposal

2017-11-24T10:18:41+00:00

Don't transmit a DELAY ACK immediately on proposal when the Rx window is rotated, but rather defer it to the work function. This means that we have a chance to queue/consume more received packets before we actually send the DELAY ACK, or even cancel it entirely, thereby reducing the number of packets transmitted. We do, however, want to continue sending other types of packet immediately, particularly REQUESTED ACKs, as they may be used for RTT calculation by the other side. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Fix call timeouts

2017-11-24T10:18:41+00:00

Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from userspace. By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three timeouts: (1) "Normal timeout" This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any packets from the peer in a while. It is measured from the last time we received any packet on that call. This is not reset by any connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets). If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal timeout so is to keep both sides alive. This is set at 1/6 of normal timeout. (2) "Idle timeout" This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data. It is measured from the last time we received a DATA packet. (3) "Hard timeout" This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that call. It should not be specified by default. Some operations (such as volume transfer) take a long time. Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a control message: RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need be given: u32 hard_timeout; /* sec from first packet */ u32 idle_timeout; /* msec from packet Rx */ u32 normal_timeout; /* msec from data Rx */ This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a call. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client call

2017-11-24T10:18:41+00:00

Delay terminal ACK transmission on a client call by deferring it to the connection processor. This allows it to be skipped if we can send the next call instead, the first DATA packet of which will implicitly ack this call. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Lock around calling a kernel service Rx notification

2017-11-02T15:07:18+00:00

Place a spinlock around the invocation of call->notify_rx() for a kernel service call and lock again when ending the call and replace the notification pointer with a pointer to a dummy function. This is required because it's possible for rxrpc_notify_socket() to be called after the call has been ended by the kernel service if called from the asynchronous work function rxrpc_process_call(). However, rxrpc_notify_socket() currently only holds the RCU read lock when invoking ->notify_rx(), which means that the afs_call struct would need to be disposed of by call_rcu() rather than by kfree(). But we shouldn't see any notifications from a call after calling rxrpc_kernel_end_call(), so a lock is required in rxrpc code. Without this, we may see the call wait queue as having a corrupt spinlock: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/0:2/1612 general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP ... Workqueue: krxrpcd rxrpc_process_call task: ffff88040b83c400 task.stack: ffff88040adfc000 RIP: 0010:spin_bug+0x161/0x18f RSP: 0018:ffff88040adffcc0 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: 0000000000000032 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX: ffffffff81ab16cf RDX: ffff88041fa14c01 RSI: ffff88041fa0ccb8 RDI: ffff88041fa0ccb8 RBP: ffff88040adffcd8 R08: 00000000ffffffff R09: 00000000ffffffff R10: ffff88040adffc60 R11: 000000000000022c R12: ffff88040aca2208 R13: ffffffff81a58114 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 .... Call Trace: do_raw_spin_lock+0x1d/0x89 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3d/0x49 ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7 __wake_up_common_lock+0x4c/0xa7 ? __lock_is_held+0x47/0x7a __wake_up+0xe/0x10 afs_wake_up_call_waiter+0x11b/0x122 [kafs] rxrpc_notify_socket+0x12b/0x258 rxrpc_process_call+0x18e/0x7d0 process_one_work+0x298/0x4de ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280 worker_thread+0x1d1/0x2ae ? rescuer_thread+0x280/0x280 kthread+0x12c/0x134 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x3a/0x3a ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 In this case, note the corrupt data in EBX. The address of the offending afs_call is in R12, plus the offset to the spinlock. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Support service upgrade from a kernel service

2017-10-18T10:37:20+00:00

Provide support for a kernel service to make use of the service upgrade facility. This involves: (1) Pass an upgrade request flag to rxrpc_kernel_begin_call(). (2) Make rxrpc_kernel_recv_data() return the call's current service ID so that the caller can detect service upgrade and see what the service was upgraded to. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Separate the connection's protocol service ID from the lookup ID

2017-06-05T13:30:49+00:00

Keep the rxrpc_connection struct's idea of the service ID that is exposed in the protocol separate from the service ID that's used as a lookup key. This allows the protocol service ID on a client connection to get upgraded without making the connection unfindable for other client calls that also would like to use the upgraded connection. The connection's actual service ID is then returned through recvmsg() by way of msg_name. Whilst we're at it, we get rid of the last_service_id field from each channel. The service ID is per-connection, not per-call and an entire connection is upgraded in one go. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Trace protocol errors in received packets

2017-04-06T10:09:39+00:00

Add a tracepoint (rxrpc_rx_proto) to record protocol errors in received packets. The following changes are made: (1) Add a function, __rxrpc_abort_eproto(), to note a protocol error on a call and mark the call aborted. This is wrapped by rxrpc_abort_eproto() that makes the why string usable in trace. (2) Add trace_rxrpc_rx_proto() or rxrpc_abort_eproto() to protocol error generation points, replacing rxrpc_abort_call() with the latter. (3) Only send an abort packet in rxkad_verify_packet*() if we actually managed to abort the call. Note that a trace event is also emitted if a kernel user (e.g. afs) tries to send data through a call when it's not in the transmission phase, though it's not technically a receive event. Signed-off-by: David Howells