kernel/git/stable/linux.git/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c, branch linux-5.7.y

rxrpc: Fix race between recvmsg and sendmsg on immediate call failure

2020-08-11T13:35:39+00:00

[ Upstream commit 65550098c1c4db528400c73acf3e46bfa78d9264 ] There's a race between rxrpc_sendmsg setting up a call, but then failing to send anything on it due to an error, and recvmsg() seeing the call completion occur and trying to return the state to the user. An assertion fails in rxrpc_recvmsg() because the call has already been released from the socket and is about to be released again as recvmsg deals with it. (The recvmsg_q queue on the socket holds a ref, so there's no problem with use-after-free.) We also have to be careful not to end up reporting an error twice, in such a way that both returns indicate to userspace that the user ID supplied with the call is no longer in use - which could cause the client to malfunction if it recycles the user ID fast enough. Fix this by the following means: (1) When sendmsg() creates a call after the point that the call has been successfully added to the socket, don't return any errors through sendmsg(), but rather complete the call and let recvmsg() retrieve them. Make sendmsg() return 0 at this point. Further calls to sendmsg() for that call will fail with ESHUTDOWN. Note that at this point, we haven't send any packets yet, so the server doesn't yet know about the call. (2) If sendmsg() returns an error when it was expected to create a new call, it means that the user ID wasn't used. (3) Mark the call disconnected before marking it completed to prevent an oops in rxrpc_release_call(). (4) recvmsg() will then retrieve the error and set MSG_EOR to indicate that the user ID is no longer known by the kernel. An oops like the following is produced: kernel BUG at net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:605! ... RIP: 0010:rxrpc_recvmsg+0x256/0x5ae ... Call Trace: ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x2f/0x2f ____sys_recvmsg+0x8a/0x148 ? import_iovec+0x69/0x9c ? copy_msghdr_from_user+0x5c/0x86 ___sys_recvmsg+0x72/0xaa ? __fget_files+0x22/0x57 ? __fget_light+0x46/0x51 ? fdget+0x9/0x1b do_recvmmsg+0x15e/0x232 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0xa/0xb ? vtime_delta+0xf/0x25 __x64_sys_recvmmsg+0x2c/0x2f do_syscall_64+0x4c/0x78 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Fixes: 357f5ef64628 ("rxrpc: Call rxrpc_release_call() on error in rxrpc_new_client_call()") Reported-by: syzbot+b54969381df354936d96@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Fix sendmsg() returning EPIPE due to recvmsg() returning ENODATA

2020-07-31T16:47:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit 639f181f0ee20d3249dbc55f740f0167267180f0 ] rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read. Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking core. Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was caused by). Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: Fix handling of last subpacket of jumbo packet

2019-10-31T19:23:09+00:00

When rxrpc_recvmsg_data() sets the return value to 1 because it's drained all the data for the last packet, it checks the last-packet flag on the whole packet - but this is wrong, since the last-packet flag is only set on the final subpacket of the last jumbo packet. This means that a call that receives its last packet in a jumbo packet won't complete properly. Fix this by having rxrpc_locate_data() determine the last-packet state of the subpacket it's looking at and passing that back to the caller rather than having the caller look in the packet header. The caller then needs to cache this in the rxrpc_call struct as rxrpc_locate_data() isn't then called again for this packet. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Fixes: e2de6c404898 ("rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packet") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix call crypto state cleanup

2019-10-07T10:05:05+00:00

Fix the cleanup of the crypto state on a call after the call has been disconnected. As the call has been disconnected, its connection ref has been discarded and so we can't go through that to get to the security ops table. Fix this by caching the security ops pointer in the rxrpc_call struct and using that when freeing the call security state. Also use this in other places we're dealing with call-specific security. The symptoms look like: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rxrpc_release_call+0xb2d/0xb60 net/rxrpc/call_object.c:481 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888062ffeb50 by task syz-executor.5/4764 Fixes: 1db88c534371 ("rxrpc: Fix -Wframe-larger-than= warnings from on-stack crypto") Reported-by: syzbot+eed305768ece6682bb7f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Use the tx-phase skb flag to simplify tracing

2019-08-27T09:04:18+00:00

Use the previously-added transmit-phase skbuff private flag to simplify the socket buffer tracing a bit. Which phase the skbuff comes from can now be divined from the skb rather than having to be guessed from the call state. We can also reduce the number of rxrpc_skb_trace values by eliminating the difference between Tx and Rx in the symbols. Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Use info in skbuff instead of reparsing a jumbo packet

2019-08-27T08:51:30+00:00

Use the information now cached in the skbuff private data to avoid the need to reparse a jumbo packet. We can find all the subpackets by dead reckoning, so it's only necessary to note how many there are, whether the last one is flagged as LAST_PACKET and whether any have the REQUEST_ACK flag set. This is necessary as once recvmsg() can see the packet, it can start modifying it, such as doing in-place decryption. Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells

rxrpc: Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packet

2019-08-09T14:24:00+00:00

Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packet as it has been obsolete since AFS 3.1. Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman

treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 152

2019-05-30T18:26:32+00:00

Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Allison Randal Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rxrpc: bad unlock balance in rxrpc_recvmsg

2019-02-06T18:54:07+00:00

When either "goto wait_interrupted;" or "goto wait_error;" paths are taken, socket lock has already been released. This patch fixes following syzbot splat : WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 5.0.0-rc4+ #59 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz-executor223/8256 is trying to release lock (sk_lock-AF_RXRPC) at: [] rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6d3/0x3099 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:598 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by syz-executor223/8256: #0: 00000000fa9ed0f4 (slock-AF_RXRPC){+...}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:334 [inline] #0: 00000000fa9ed0f4 (slock-AF_RXRPC){+...}, at: release_sock+0x20/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2798 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 8256 Comm: syz-executor223 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4+ #59 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_unlock_imbalance_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3391 [inline] print_unlock_imbalance_bug.cold+0x114/0x123 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3368 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3601 [inline] lock_release+0x67e/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3860 sock_release_ownership include/net/sock.h:1471 [inline] release_sock+0x183/0x1c0 net/core/sock.c:2808 rxrpc_recvmsg+0x6d3/0x3099 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c:598 sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:794 [inline] sock_recvmsg net/socket.c:801 [inline] sock_recvmsg+0xd0/0x110 net/socket.c:797 __sys_recvfrom+0x1ff/0x350 net/socket.c:1845 __do_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:1863 [inline] __se_sys_recvfrom net/socket.c:1859 [inline] __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe1/0x1a0 net/socket.c:1859 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x446379 Code: e8 2c b3 02 00 48 83 c4 18 c3 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 2b 09 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007fe5da89fd98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002d RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000006dbc28 RCX: 0000000000446379 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00000000006dbc20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000006dbc2c R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 20c49ba5e353f7cf Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Cc: David Howells Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Allow the reply time to be obtained on a client call

2018-10-04T08:42:29+00:00

Allow the timestamp on the sk_buff holding the first DATA packet of a reply to be queried. This can then be used as a base for the expiry time calculation on the callback promise duration indicated by an operation result. Signed-off-by: David Howells