kernel/git/stable/linux.git/net/rxrpc, branch linux-5.19.y

rxrpc: Fix an insufficiently large sglist in rxkad_verify_packet_2()

2022-09-15T08:47:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit 0d40f728e28393a8817d1fcae923dfa3409e488c ] rxkad_verify_packet_2() has a small stack-allocated sglist of 4 elements, but if that isn't sufficient for the number of fragments in the socket buffer, we try to allocate an sglist large enough to hold all the fragments. However, for large packets with a lot of fragments, this isn't sufficient and we need at least one additional fragment. The problem manifests as skb_to_sgvec() returning -EMSGSIZE and this then getting returned by userspace. Most of the time, this isn't a problem as rxrpc sets a limit of 5692, big enough for 4 jumbo subpackets to be glued together; occasionally, however, the server will ignore the reported limit and give a packet that's a lot bigger - say 19852 bytes with ->nr_frags being 7. skb_to_sgvec() then tries to return a "zeroth" fragment that seems to occur before the fragments counted by ->nr_frags and we hit the end of the sglist too early. Note that __skb_to_sgvec() also has an skb_walk_frags() loop that is recursive up to 24 deep. I'm not sure if I need to take account of that too - or if there's an easy way of counting those frags too. Fix this by counting an extra frag and allocating a larger sglist based on that. Fixes: d0d5c0cd1e71 ("rxrpc: Use skb_unshare() rather than skb_cow_data()") Reported-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rxrpc: Fix ICMP/ICMP6 error handling

2022-09-15T08:47:15+00:00

[ Upstream commit ac56a0b48da86fd1b4389632fb7c4c8a5d86eefa ] Because rxrpc pretends to be a tunnel on top of a UDP/UDP6 socket, allowing it to siphon off UDP packets early in the handling of received UDP packets thereby avoiding the packet going through the UDP receive queue, it doesn't get ICMP packets through the UDP ->sk_error_report() callback. In fact, it doesn't appear that there's any usable option for getting hold of ICMP packets. Fix this by adding a new UDP encap hook to distribute error messages for UDP tunnels. If the hook is set, then the tunnel driver will be able to see ICMP packets. The hook provides the offset into the packet of the UDP header of the original packet that caused the notification. An alternative would be to call the ->error_handler() hook - but that requires that the skbuff be cloned (as ip_icmp_error() or ipv6_cmp_error() do, though isn't really necessary or desirable in rxrpc's case is we want to parse them there and then, not queue them). Changes ======= ver #3) - Fixed an uninitialised variable. ver #2) - Fixed some missing CONFIG_AF_RXRPC_IPV6 conditionals. Fixes: 5271953cad31 ("rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rxrpc: Fix locking in rxrpc's sendmsg

2022-08-31T15:18:11+00:00

[ Upstream commit b0f571ecd7943423c25947439045f0d352ca3dbf ] Fix three bugs in the rxrpc's sendmsg implementation: (1) rxrpc_new_client_call() should release the socket lock when returning an error from rxrpc_get_call_slot(). (2) rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window_intr() will return without the call mutex held in the event that we're interrupted by a signal whilst waiting for tx space on the socket or relocking the call mutex afterwards. Fix this by: (a) moving the unlock/lock of the call mutex up to rxrpc_send_data() such that the lock is not held around all of rxrpc_wait_for_tx_window*() and (b) indicating to higher callers whether we're return with the lock dropped. Note that this means recvmsg() will not block on this call whilst we're waiting. (3) After dropping and regaining the call mutex, rxrpc_send_data() needs to go and recheck the state of the tx_pending buffer and the tx_total_len check in case we raced with another sendmsg() on the same call. Thinking on this some more, it might make sense to have different locks for sendmsg() and recvmsg(). There's probably no need to make recvmsg() wait for sendmsg(). It does mean that recvmsg() can return MSG_EOR indicating that a call is dead before a sendmsg() to that call returns - but that can currently happen anyway. Without fix (2), something like the following can be induced: WARNING: bad unlock balance detected! 5.16.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------- syz-executor011/3597 is trying to release lock (&call->user_mutex) at: [] rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 but there are no more locks to release! other info that might help us debug this: no locks held by syz-executor011/3597. ... Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_unlock_imbalance_bug include/trace/events/lock.h:58 [inline] __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5306 [inline] lock_release.cold+0x49/0x4e kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5657 __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x99/0x5e0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:900 rxrpc_do_sendmsg+0xc13/0x1350 net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c:748 rxrpc_sendmsg+0x420/0x630 net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c:561 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 ____sys_sendmsg+0x6e8/0x810 net/socket.c:2409 ___sys_sendmsg+0xf3/0x170 net/socket.c:2463 __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2492 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [Thanks to Hawkins Jiawei and Khalid Masum for their attempts to fix this] Fixes: bc5e3a546d55 ("rxrpc: Use MSG_WAITALL to tell sendmsg() to temporarily ignore signals") Reported-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne Tested-by: syzbot+7f0483225d0c94cb3441@syzkaller.appspotmail.com cc: Hawkins Jiawei cc: Khalid Masum cc: Dan Carpenter cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166135894583.600315.7170979436768124075.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

2022-05-24T04:19:17+00:00

drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c 5cebb40bc955 ("net: macb: Fix PTP one step sync support") 138badbc21a0 ("net: macb: use NAPI for TX completion path") https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523111021.31489367@canb.auug.org.au/ net/smc/af_smc.c 75c1edf23b95 ("net/smc: postpone sk_refcnt increment in connect()") 3aba103006bc ("net/smc: align the connect behaviour with TCP") https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220524114408.4bf1af38@canb.auug.org.au/ Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski

rxrpc: Fix decision on when to generate an IDLE ACK

2022-05-22T20:30:53+00:00

Fix the decision on when to generate an IDLE ACK by keeping a count of the number of packets we've received, but not yet soft-ACK'd, and the number of packets we've processed, but not yet hard-ACK'd, rather than trying to keep track of which DATA sequence numbers correspond to those points. We then generate an ACK when either counter exceeds 2. The counters are both cleared when we transcribe the information into any sort of ACK packet for transmission. IDLE and DELAY ACKs are skipped if both counters are 0 (ie. no change). Fixes: 805b21b929e2 ("rxrpc: Send an ACK after every few DATA packets we receive") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Don't let ack.previousPacket regress

2022-05-22T20:30:53+00:00

The previousPacket field in the rx ACK packet should never go backwards - it's now the highest DATA sequence number received, not the last on received (it used to be used for out of sequence detection). Fixes: 248f219cb8bc ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix overlapping ACK accounting

2022-05-22T20:30:53+00:00

Fix accidental overlapping of Rx-phase ACK accounting with Tx-phase ACK accounting through variables shared between the two. call->acks_* members refer to ACKs received in the Tx phase and call->ackr_* members to ACKs sent/to be sent during the Rx phase. Fixes: 1a2391c30c0b ("rxrpc: Fix detection of out of order acks") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: Jeffrey Altman cc: Marc Dionne cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Don't try to resend the request if we're receiving the reply

2022-05-22T20:30:53+00:00

rxrpc has a timer to trigger resending of unacked data packets in a call. This is not cancelled when a client call switches to the receive phase on the basis that most calls don't last long enough for it to ever expire. However, if it *does* expire after we've started to receive the reply, we shouldn't then go into trying to retransmit or pinging the server to find out if an ack got lost. Fix this by skipping the resend code if we're into receiving the reply to a client call. Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both") Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

rxrpc: Fix listen() setting the bar too high for the prealloc rings

2022-05-22T20:30:53+00:00

AF_RXRPC's listen() handler lets you set the backlog up to 32 (if you bump up the sysctl), but whilst the preallocation circular buffers have 32 slots in them, one of them has to be a dead slot because we're using CIRC_CNT(). This means that listen(rxrpc_sock, 32) will cause an oops when the socket is closed because rxrpc_service_prealloc_one() allocated one too many calls and rxrpc_discard_prealloc() won't then be able to get rid of them because it'll think the ring is empty. rxrpc_release_calls_on_socket() then tries to abort them, but oopses because call->peer isn't yet set. Fix this by setting the maximum backlog to RXRPC_BACKLOG_MAX - 1 to match the ring capacity. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000086 ... RIP: 0010:rxrpc_send_abort_packet+0x73/0x240 [rxrpc] Call Trace: ? __wake_up_common_lock+0x7a/0x90 ? rxrpc_notify_socket+0x8e/0x140 [rxrpc] ? rxrpc_abort_call+0x4c/0x60 [rxrpc] rxrpc_release_calls_on_socket+0x107/0x1a0 [rxrpc] rxrpc_release+0xc9/0x1c0 [rxrpc] __sock_release+0x37/0xa0 sock_close+0x11/0x20 __fput+0x89/0x240 task_work_run+0x59/0x90 do_exit+0x319/0xaa0 Fixes: 00e907127e6f ("rxrpc: Preallocate peers, conns and calls for incoming service requests") Reported-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2022-March/005079.html Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

afs: Adjust ACK interpretation to try and cope with NAT

2022-05-22T20:03:02+00:00

If a client's address changes, say if it is NAT'd, this can disrupt an in progress operation. For most operations, this is not much of a problem, but StoreData can be different as some servers modify the target file as the data comes in, so if a store request is disrupted, the file can get corrupted on the server. The problem is that the server doesn't recognise packets that come after the change of address as belonging to the original client and will bounce them, either by sending an OUT_OF_SEQUENCE ACK to the apparent new call if the packet number falls within the initial sequence number window of a call or by sending an EXCEEDS_WINDOW ACK if it falls outside and then aborting it. In both cases, firstPacket will be 1 and previousPacket will be 0 in the ACK information. Fix this by the following means: (1) If a client call receives an EXCEEDS_WINDOW ACK with firstPacket as 1 and previousPacket as 0, assume this indicates that the server saw the incoming packets from a different peer and thus as a different call. Fail the call with error -ENETRESET. (2) Also fail the call if a similar OUT_OF_SEQUENCE ACK occurs if the first packet has been hard-ACK'd. If it hasn't been hard-ACK'd, the ACK packet will cause it to get retransmitted, so the call will just be repeated. (3) Make afs_select_fileserver() treat -ENETRESET as a straight fail of the operation. (4) Prioritise the error code over things like -ECONNRESET as the server did actually respond. (5) Make writeback treat -ENETRESET as a retryable error and make it redirty all the pages involved in a write so that the VM will retry. Note that there is still a circumstance that I can't easily deal with: if the operation is fully received and processed by the server, but the reply is lost due to address change. There's no way to know if the op happened. We can examine the server, but a conflicting change could have been made by a third party - and we can't tell the difference. In such a case, a message like: kAFS: vnode modified {100058:146266} b7->b8 YFS.StoreData64 (op=2646a) will be logged to dmesg on the next op to touch the file and the client will reset the inode state, including invalidating clean parts of the pagecache. Reported-by: Marc Dionne Signed-off-by: David Howells cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2021-December/004811.html # v1 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller