summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-03-20arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x supportRobert Marko
Add support for Microchip LAN969x switch SoC series by adding the SoC DTSI. Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> Acked-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260302112153.464422-5-robert.marko@sartura.hr Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
2026-03-20arm64: dts: microchip: add LAN969x clock header fileRobert Marko
LAN969x uses hardware clock indexes, so document theses in a header to make them humanly readable. Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr> Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260302112153.464422-4-robert.marko@sartura.hr Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
2026-03-19Merge tag 'parisc-for-7.0-rc5' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux Pull parisc fix from Helge Deller: "Fix for the cacheflush() syscall which had D/I caches mixed up" * tag 'parisc-for-7.0-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux: parisc: Flush correct cache in cacheflush() syscall
2026-03-19x86/cpu: Remove LASS restriction on vsyscall emulationSohil Mehta
Vsyscall emulation has two modes of operation: XONLY and EMULATE. The default XONLY mode is now supported with a LASS-triggered #GP. OTOH, LASS is disabled if someone requests the deprecated EMULATE mode via the vsyscall=emulate command line option. So, remove the restriction on LASS when the overall vsyscall emulation support is compiled in. As a result, there is no need for setup_lass() anymore. LASS is enabled by default through a late_initcall(). Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Reviewed-by: Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309181029.398498-6-sohil.mehta@intel.com
2026-03-19x86/vsyscall: Disable LASS if vsyscall mode is set to EMULATESohil Mehta
The EMULATE mode of vsyscall maps the vsyscall page with a high kernel address directly into user address space. Reading the vsyscall page in EMULATE mode would cause LASS to trigger a #GP. Fixing the LASS violation in EMULATE mode would require complex instruction decoding because the resulting #GP does include the necessary error information, and the vsyscall address is not readily available in the RIP. The EMULATE mode has been deprecated since 2022 and can only be enabled using the command line parameter vsyscall=emulate. See commit bf00745e7791 ("x86/vsyscall: Remove CONFIG_LEGACY_VSYSCALL_EMULATE") for details. At this point, no one is expected to be using this insecure mode. The rare usages that need it obviously do not care about security. Disable LASS when EMULATE mode is requested to avoid breaking legacy user software. Also, update the vsyscall documentation to reflect this. LASS will only be supported if vsyscall mode is set to XONLY (default) or NONE. Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309181029.398498-5-sohil.mehta@intel.com
2026-03-19x86/vsyscall: Restore vsyscall=xonly mode under LASSSohil Mehta
Background ========== The vsyscall page is located in the high/kernel part of the address space. Prior to LASS, a vsyscall page access from userspace would always generate a #PF. The kernel emulates the accesses in the #PF handler and returns the appropriate values to userspace. Vsyscall emulation has two modes of operation, specified by the vsyscall={xonly, emulate} kernel command line option. The vsyscall page behaves as execute-only in XONLY mode or read-execute in EMULATE mode. XONLY mode is the default and the only one expected to be commonly used. The EMULATE mode has been deprecated since 2022 and is considered insecure. With LASS, a vsyscall page access triggers a #GP instead of a #PF. Currently, LASS is only enabled when all vsyscall modes are disabled. LASS with XONLY mode ==================== Now add support for LASS specifically with XONLY vsyscall emulation. For XONLY mode, all that is needed is the faulting RIP, which is trivially available regardless of the type of fault. Reuse the #PF emulation code during the #GP when the fault address points to the vsyscall page. As multiple fault handlers will now be using the emulation code, add a sanity check to ensure that the fault truly happened in 64-bit user mode. LASS with EMULATE mode ====================== Supporting vsyscall=emulate with LASS is much harder because the #GP doesn't provide enough error information (such as PFEC and CR2 as in case of a #PF). So, complex instruction decoding would be required to emulate this mode in the #GP handler. This isn't worth the effort as remaining users of EMULATE mode can be reasonably assumed to be niche users, who are already trading off security for compatibility. LASS and vsyscall=emulate will be kept mutually exclusive for simplicity. Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309181029.398498-4-sohil.mehta@intel.com
2026-03-19x86/traps: Consolidate user fixups in the #GP handlerSohil Mehta
Move the UMIP exception fixup under the common "if (user_mode(regs))" condition where the rest of user mode fixups reside. Also, move the UMIP feature check into its fixup function to keep the calling code consistent and clean. No functional change intended. Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309181029.398498-3-sohil.mehta@intel.com
2026-03-19x86/vsyscall: Reorganize the page fault emulation codeSohil Mehta
With LASS, vsyscall page accesses will cause a #GP instead of a #PF. Separate out the core vsyscall emulation code from the #PF specific handling in preparation for the upcoming #GP emulation. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260309181029.398498-2-sohil.mehta@intel.com
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Communicate userspace-driveable PPIs via a UAPISascha Bischoff
GICv5 systems will likely not support the full set of PPIs. The presence of any virtual PPI is tied to the presence of the physical PPI. Therefore, the available PPIs will be limited by the physical host. Userspace cannot drive any PPIs that are not implemented. Moreover, it is not desirable to expose all PPIs to the guest in the first place, even if they are supported in hardware. Some devices, such as the arch timer, are implemented in KVM, and hence those PPIs shouldn't be driven by userspace, either. Provided a new UAPI: KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL => KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_USERPSPACE_PPIs This allows userspace to query which PPIs it is able to drive via KVM_IRQ_LINE. Additionally, introduce a check in kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line() to reject any PPIs not in the userspace mask. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-40-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Probe for GICv5 deviceSascha Bischoff
The basic GICv5 PPI support is now complete. Allow probing for a native GICv5 rather than just the legacy support. The implementation doesn't support protected VMs with GICv5 at this time. Therefore, if KVM has protected mode enabled the native GICv5 init is skipped, but legacy VMs are allowed if the hardware supports it. At this stage the GICv5 KVM implementation only supports PPIs, and doesn't interact with the host IRS at all. This means that there is no need to check how many concurrent VMs or vCPUs per VM are supported by the IRS - the PPI support only requires the CPUIF. The support is artificially limited to VGIC_V5_MAX_CPUS, i.e. 512, vCPUs per VM. With this change it becomes possible to run basic GICv5-based VMs, provided that they only use PPIs. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-38-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Set ICH_VCTLR_EL2.En on bootSascha Bischoff
This control enables virtual HPPI selection, i.e., selection and delivery of interrupts for a guest (assuming that the guest itself has opted to receive interrupts). This is set to enabled on boot as there is no reason for disabling it in normal operation as virtual interrupt signalling itself is still controlled via the HCR_EL2. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-37-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Introduce kvm_arm_vgic_v5_ops and register themSascha Bischoff
Only the KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL->KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT op is currently supported. All other ops are stubbed out. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-36-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Hide FEAT_GCIE from NV GICv5 guestsSascha Bischoff
Currently, NV guests are not supported with GICv5. Therefore, make sure that FEAT_GCIE is always hidden from such guests. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-35-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic: Hide GICv5 for protected guestsSascha Bischoff
We don't support running protected guest with GICv5 at the moment. Therefore, be sure that we don't expose it to the guest at all by actively hiding it when running a protected guest. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-34-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Mandate architected PPI for PMU emulation on GICv5Sascha Bischoff
Make it mandatory to use the architected PPI when running a GICv5 guest. Attempts to set anything other than the architected PPI (23) are rejected. Additionally, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT is relaxed to no longer require KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ to be called for GICv5-based guests. In this case, the architectued PPI is automatically used. Documentation is bumped accordingly. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-33-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Enlighten arch timer for GICv5Sascha Bischoff
Now that GICv5 has arrived, the arch timer requires some TLC to address some of the key differences introduced with GICv5. For PPIs on GICv5, the queue_irq_unlock irq_op is used as AP lists are not required at all for GICv5. The arch timer also introduces an irq_op - get_input_level. Extend the arch-timer-provided irq_ops to include the PPI op for vgic_v5 guests. When possible, DVI (Direct Virtual Interrupt) is set for PPIs when using a vgic_v5, which directly inject the pending state into the guest. This means that the host never sees the interrupt for the guest for these interrupts. This has three impacts. * First of all, the kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer check is updated to explicitly check if the timers are expected to fire. * Secondly, for mapped timers (which use DVI) they must be masked on the host prior to entering a GICv5 guest, and unmasked on the return path. This is handled in set_timer_irq_phys_masked. * Thirdly, it makes zero sense to attempt to inject state for a DVI'd interrupt. Track which timers are direct, and skip the call to kvm_vgic_inject_irq() for these. The final, but rather important, change is that the architected PPIs for the timers are made mandatory for a GICv5 guest. Attempts to set them to anything else are actively rejected. Once a vgic_v5 is initialised, the arch timer PPIs are also explicitly reinitialised to ensure the correct GICv5-compatible PPIs are used - this also adds in the GICv5 PPI type to the intid. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-32-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Initialise ID and priority bits when resetting vcpuSascha Bischoff
Determine the number of priority bits and ID bits exposed to the guest as part of resetting the vcpu state. These values are presented to the guest by trapping and emulating reads from ICC_IDR0_EL1. GICv5 supports either 16- or 24-bits of ID space (for SPIs and LPIs). It is expected that 2^16 IDs is more than enough, and therefore this value is chosen irrespective of the hardware supporting more or not. The GICv5 architecture only supports 5 bits of priority in the CPU interface (but potentially fewer in the IRS). Therefore, this is the default value chosen for the number of priority bits in the CPU IF. Note: We replicate the way that GICv3 uses the num_id_bits and num_pri_bits variables. That is, num_id_bits stores the value of the hardware field verbatim (0 means 16-bits, 1 would mean 24-bits for GICv5), and num_pri_bits stores the actual number of priority bits; the field value + 1. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-30-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Create and initialise vgic_v5Sascha Bischoff
Update kvm_vgic_create to create a vgic_v5 device. When creating a vgic, FEAT_GCIE in the ID_AA64PFR2 is only exposed to vgic_v5-based guests, and is hidden otherwise. GIC in ~ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 is never exposed for a vgic_v5 guest. When initialising a vgic_v5, skip kvm_vgic_dist_init as GICv5 doesn't support one. The current vgic_v5 implementation only supports PPIs, so no SPIs are initialised either. The current vgic_v5 support doesn't extend to nested guests. Therefore, the init of vgic_v5 for a nested guest is failed in vgic_v5_init. As the current vgic_v5 doesn't require any resources to be mapped, vgic_v5_map_resources is simply used to check that the vgic has indeed been initialised. Again, this will change as more GICv5 support is merged in. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-29-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Support GICv5 interrupts with KVM_IRQ_LINESascha Bischoff
Interrupts under GICv5 look quite different to those from older Arm GICs. Specifically, the type is encoded in the top bits of the interrupt ID. Extend KVM_IRQ_LINE to cope with GICv5 PPIs and SPIs. The requires subtly changing the KVM_IRQ_LINE API for GICv5 guests. For older Arm GICs, PPIs had to be in the range of 16-31, and SPIs had to be 32-1019, but this no longer holds true for GICv5. Instead, for a GICv5 guest support PPIs in the range of 0-127, and SPIs in the range 0-65535. The documentation is updated accordingly. The SPI range doesn't cover the full SPI range that a GICv5 system can potentially cope with (GICv5 provides up to 24-bits of SPI ID space, and we only have 16 bits to work with in KVM_IRQ_LINE). However, 65k SPIs is more than would be reasonably expected on systems for years to come. In order to use vgic_is_v5(), the kvm/arm_vgic.h header is added to kvm/arm.c. Note: As the GICv5 KVM implementation currently doesn't support injecting SPIs attempts to do so will fail. This restriction will by lifted as the GICv5 KVM support evolves. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-28-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement direct injection of PPIsSascha Bischoff
GICv5 is able to directly inject PPI pending state into a guest using a mechanism called DVI whereby the pending bit for a paticular PPI is driven directly by the physically-connected hardware. This mechanism itself doesn't allow for any ID translation, so the host interrupt is directly mapped into a guest with the same interrupt ID. When mapping a virtual interrupt to a physical interrupt via kvm_vgic_map_irq for a GICv5 guest, check if the interrupt itself is a PPI or not. If it is, and the host's interrupt ID matches that used for the guest DVI is enabled, and the interrupt itself is marked as directly_injected. When the interrupt is unmapped again, this process is reversed, and DVI is disabled for the interrupt again. Note: the expectation is that a directly injected PPI is disabled on the host while the guest state is loaded. The reason is that although DVI is enabled to drive the guest's pending state directly, the host pending state also remains driven. In order to avoid the same PPI firing on both the host and the guest, the host's interrupt must be disabled (masked). This is left up to the code that owns the device generating the PPI as this needs to be handled on a per-VM basis. One VM might use DVI, while another might not, in which case the physical PPI should be enabled for the latter. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-27-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: Introduce set_direct_injection irq_opSascha Bischoff
GICv5 adds support for directly injected PPIs. The mechanism for setting this up is GICv5 specific, so rather than adding GICv5-specific code to the common vgic code, we introduce a new irq_op. This new irq_op is intended to be used to enable or disable direct injection for interrupts that support it. As it is an irq_op, it has no effect unless explicitly populated in the irq_ops structure for a particular interrupt. The usage is demonstracted in the subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-26-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Trap and mask guest ICC_PPI_ENABLERx_EL1 writesSascha Bischoff
A guest should not be able to detect if a PPI that is not exposed to the guest is implemented or not. Avoid the guest enabling any PPIs that are not implemented as far as the guest is concerned by trapping and masking writes to the two ICC_PPI_ENABLERx_EL1 registers. When a guest writes these registers, the write is masked with the set of PPIs actually exposed to the guest, and the state is written back to KVM's shadow state. As there is now no way for the guest to change the PPI enable state without it being trapped, saving of the PPI Enable state is dropped from guest exit. Reads for the above registers are not masked. When the guest is running and reads from the above registers, it is presented with what KVM provides in the ICH_PPI_ENABLERx_EL2 registers, which is the masked version of what the guest last wrote. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-25-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Check for pending PPIsSascha Bischoff
This change allows KVM to check for pending PPI interrupts. This has two main components: First of all, the effective priority mask is calculated. This is a combination of the priority mask in the VPEs ICC_PCR_EL1.PRIORITY and the currently running priority as determined from the VPE's ICH_APR_EL1. If an interrupt's priority is greater than or equal to the effective priority mask, it can be signalled. Otherwise, it cannot. Secondly, any Enabled and Pending PPIs must be checked against this compound priority mask. The reqires the PPI priorities to by synced back to the KVM shadow state on WFI entry - this is skipped in general operation as it isn't required and is rather expensive. If any Enabled and Pending PPIs are of sufficient priority to be signalled, then there are pending PPIs. Else, there are not. This ensures that a VPE is not woken when it cannot actually process the pending interrupts. As the PPI priorities are not synced back to the KVM shadow state on every guest exit, they must by synced prior to checking if there are pending interrupts for the guest. The sync itself happens in vgic_v5_put() if, and only if, the vcpu is entering WFI as this is the only case where it is not planned to run the vcpu thread again. If the vcpu enters WFI, the vcpu thread will be descheduled and won't be rescheduled again until it has a pending interrupt, which is checked from kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(). Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-24-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Clear TWI if single task runningSascha Bischoff
Handle GICv5 in kvm_vcpu_should_clear_twi(). Clear TWI if there is a single task running, and enable it otherwise. This is a sane default for GICv5 given the current level of support. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-23-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Init Private IRQs (PPIs) for GICv5Sascha Bischoff
Initialise the private interrupts (PPIs, only) for GICv5. This means that a GICv5-style intid is generated (which encodes the PPI type in the top bits) instead of the 0-based index that is used for older GICs. Additionally, set all of the GICv5 PPIs to use Level for the handling mode, with the exception of the SW_PPI which uses Edge. This matches the architecturally-defined set in the GICv5 specification (the CTIIRQ handling mode is IMPDEF, so Level has been picked for that). Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-22-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement PPI interrupt injectionSascha Bischoff
This change introduces interrupt injection for PPIs for GICv5-based guests. The lifecycle of PPIs is largely managed by the hardware for a GICv5 system. The hypervisor injects pending state into the guest by using the ICH_PPI_PENDRx_EL2 registers. These are used by the hardware to pick a Highest Priority Pending Interrupt (HPPI) for the guest based on the enable state of each individual interrupt. The enable state and priority for each interrupt are provided by the guest itself (through writes to the PPI registers). When Direct Virtual Interrupt (DVI) is set for a particular PPI, the hypervisor is even able to skip the injection of the pending state altogether - it all happens in hardware. The result of the above is that no AP lists are required for GICv5, unlike for older GICs. Instead, for PPIs the ICH_PPI_* registers fulfil the same purpose for all 128 PPIs. Hence, as long as the ICH_PPI_* registers are populated prior to guest entry, and merged back into the KVM shadow state on exit, the PPI state is preserved, and interrupts can be injected. When injecting the state of a PPI the state is merged into the PPI-specific vgic_irq structure. The PPIs are made pending via the ICH_PPI_PENDRx_EL2 registers, the value of which is generated from the vgic_irq structures for each PPI exposed on guest entry. The queue_irq_unlock() irq_op is required to kick the vCPU to ensure that it seems the new state. The result is that no AP lists are used for private interrupts on GICv5. Prior to entering the guest, vgic_v5_flush_ppi_state() is called from kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(). This generates the pending state to inject into the guest, and snapshots it (twice - an entry and an exit copy) in order to track any changes. These changes can come from a guest consuming an interrupt or from a guest making an Edge-triggered interrupt pending. When returning from running a guest, the guest's PPI state is merged back into KVM's vgic_irq state in vgic_v5_merge_ppi_state() from kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(). The Enable and Active state is synced back for all PPIs, and the pending state is synced back for Edge PPIs (Level is driven directly by the devices generating said levels). The incoming pending state from the guest is merged with KVM's shadow state to avoid losing any incoming interrupts. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-21-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce queue_irq_unlock to irq_opsSascha Bischoff
There are times when the default behaviour of vgic_queue_irq_unlock() is undesirable. This is because some GICs, such a GICv5 which is the main driver for this change, handle the majority of the interrupt lifecycle in hardware. In this case, there is no need for a per-VCPU AP list as the interrupt can be made pending directly. This is done either via the ICH_PPI_x_EL2 registers for PPIs, or with the VDPEND system instruction for SPIs and LPIs. The vgic_queue_irq_unlock() function is made overridable using a new function pointer in struct irq_ops. vgic_queue_irq_unlock() is overridden if the function pointer is non-null. This new irq_op is unused in this change - it is purely providing the infrastructure itself. The subsequent PPI injection changes provide a demonstration of the usage of the queue_irq_unlock irq_op. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-20-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Finalize GICv5 PPIs and generate maskSascha Bischoff
We only want to expose a subset of the PPIs to a guest. If a PPI does not have an owner, it is not being actively driven by a device. The SW_PPI is a special case, as it is likely for userspace to wish to inject that. Therefore, just prior to running the guest for the first time, we need to finalize the PPIs. A mask is generated which, when combined with trapping a guest's PPI accesses, allows for the guest's view of the PPI to be filtered. This mask is global to the VM as all VCPUs PPI configurations must match. In addition, the PPI HMR is calculated. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-19-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Implement GICv5 load/put and save/restoreSascha Bischoff
This change introduces GICv5 load/put. Additionally, it plumbs in save/restore for: * PPIs (ICH_PPI_x_EL2 regs) * ICH_VMCR_EL2 * ICH_APR_EL2 * ICC_ICSR_EL1 A GICv5-specific enable bit is added to struct vgic_vmcr as this differs from previous GICs. On GICv5-native systems, the VMCR only contains the enable bit (driven by the guest via ICC_CR0_EL1.EN) and the priority mask (PCR). A struct gicv5_vpe is also introduced. This currently only contains a single field - bool resident - which is used to track if a VPE is currently running or not, and is used to avoid a case of double load or double put on the WFI path for a vCPU. This struct will be extended as additional GICv5 support is merged, specifically for VPE doorbells. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-18-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add vgic-v5 save/restore hyp interfaceSascha Bischoff
Introduce the following hyp functions to save/restore GICv5 state: * __vgic_v5_save_apr() * __vgic_v5_restore_vmcr_apr() * __vgic_v5_save_ppi_state() - no hypercall required * __vgic_v5_restore_ppi_state() - no hypercall required * __vgic_v5_save_state() - no hypercall required * __vgic_v5_restore_state() - no hypercall required Note that the functions tagged as not requiring hypercalls are always called directly from the same context. They are either called via the vgic_save_state()/vgic_restore_state() path when running with VHE, or via __hyp_vgic_save_state()/__hyp_vgic_restore_state() otherwise. This mimics how vgic_v3_save_state()/vgic_v3_restore_state() are implemented. Overall, the state of the following registers is saved/restored: * ICC_ICSR_EL1 * ICH_APR_EL2 * ICH_PPI_ACTIVERx_EL2 * ICH_PPI_DVIRx_EL2 * ICH_PPI_ENABLERx_EL2 * ICH_PPI_PENDRx_EL2 * ICH_PPI_PRIORITYRx_EL2 * ICH_VMCR_EL2 All of these are saved/restored to/from the KVM vgic_v5 CPUIF shadow state, with the exception of the PPI active, pending, and enable state. The pending state is saved and restored from kvm_host_data as any changes here need to be tracked and propagated back to the vgic_irq shadow structures (coming in a future commit). Therefore, an entry and an exit copy is required. The active and enable state is restored from the vgic_v5 CPUIF, but is saved to kvm_host_data. Again, this needs to by synced back into the shadow data structures. The ICSR must be save/restored as this register is shared between host and guest. Therefore, to avoid leaking host state to the guest, this must be saved and restored. Moreover, as this can by used by the host at any time, it must be save/restored eagerly. Note: the host state is not preserved as the host should only use this register when preemption is disabled. As with GICv3, the VMCR is eagerly saved as this is required when checking if interrupts can be injected or not, and therefore impacts things such as WFI. As part of restoring the ICH_VMCR_EL2 and ICH_APR_EL2, GICv3-compat mode is also disabled by setting the ICH_VCTLR_EL2.V3 bit to 0. The correspoinding GICv3-compat mode enable is part of the VMCR & APR restore for a GICv3 guest as it only takes effect when actually running a guest. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-17-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Trap and emulate ICC_IDR0_EL1 accessesSascha Bischoff
Unless accesses to the ICC_IDR0_EL1 are trapped by KVM, the guest reads the same state as the host. This isn't desirable as it limits the migratability of VMs and means that KVM can't hide hardware features such as FEAT_GCIE_LEGACY. Trap and emulate accesses to the register, and present KVM's chosen ID bits and Priority bits (which is 5, as GICv5 only supports 5 bits of priority in the CPU interface). FEAT_GCIE_LEGACY is never presented to the guest as it is only relevant for nested guests doing mixed GICv5 and GICv3 support. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-16-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add emulation for ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 accessesSascha Bischoff
GICv5 doesn't provide an ICV_IAFFIDR_EL1 or ICH_IAFFIDR_EL2 for providing the IAFFID to the guest. A guest access to the ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 must therefore be trapped and emulated to avoid the guest accessing the host's ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1. The virtual IAFFID is provided to the guest when it reads ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 (which always traps back to the hypervisor). Writes are rightly ignored. KVM treats the GICv5 VPEID, the virtual IAFFID, and the vcpu_id as the same, and so the vcpu_id is returned. The trapping for the ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 is always enabled when in a guest context. Co-authored-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-15-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Support GICv5 FGTs & FGUsSascha Bischoff
Extend the existing FGT/FGU infrastructure to include the GICv5 trap registers (ICH_HFGRTR_EL2, ICH_HFGWTR_EL2, ICH_HFGITR_EL2). This involves mapping the trap registers and their bits to the corresponding feature that introduces them (FEAT_GCIE for all, in this case), and mapping each trap bit to the system register/instruction controlled by it. As of this change, none of the GICv5 instructions or register accesses are being trapped. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-14-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Sanitize ID_AA64PFR2_EL1.GCIESascha Bischoff
Add in a sanitization function for ID_AA64PFR2_EL1, preserving the already-present behaviour for the FPMR, MTEFAR, and MTESTOREONLY fields. Add sanitisation for the GCIE field, which is set to IMP if the host supports a GICv5 guest and NI, otherwise. Extend the sanitisation that takes place in kvm_vgic_create() to zero the ID_AA64PFR2.GCIE field when a non-GICv5 GIC is created. More importantly, move this sanitisation to a separate function, kvm_vgic_finalize_sysregs(), and call it from kvm_finalize_sys_regs(). We are required to finalize the GIC and GCIE fields a second time in kvm_finalize_sys_regs() due to how QEMU blindly reads out then verbatim restores the system register state. This avoids the issue where both the GCIE and GIC features are marked as present (an architecturally invalid combination), and hence guests fall over. See the comment in kvm_finalize_sys_regs() for more details. Overall, the following happens: * Before an irqchip is created, FEAT_GCIE is presented if the host supports GICv5-based guests. * Once an irqchip is created, all other supported irqchips are hidden from the guest; system register state reflects the guest's irqchip. * Userspace is allowed to set invalid irqchip feature combinations in the system registers, but... * ...invalid combinations are removed a second time prior to the first run of the guest, and things hopefully just work. All of this extra work is required to make sure that "legacy" GICv3 guests based on QEMU transparently work on compatible GICv5 hosts without modification. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-13-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Detect implemented PPIs on bootSascha Bischoff
As part of booting the system and initialising KVM, create and populate a mask of the implemented PPIs. This mask allows future PPI operations (such as save/restore or state, or syncing back into the shadow state) to only consider PPIs that are actually implemented on the host. The set of implemented virtual PPIs matches the set of implemented physical PPIs for a GICv5 host. Therefore, this mask represents all PPIs that could ever by used by a GICv5-based guest on a specific host, albeit pre-filtered by what we support in KVM (see next paragraph). Only architected PPIs are currently supported in KVM with GICv5. Moreover, as KVM only supports a subset of all possible PPIS (Timers, PMU, GICv5 SW_PPI) the PPI mask only includes these PPIs, if present. The timers are always assumed to be present; if we have KVM we have EL2, which means that we have the EL1 & EL2 Timer PPIs. If we have a PMU (v3), then the PMUIRQ is present. The GICv5 SW_PPI is always assumed to be present. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-12-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic-v5: Add Arm copyright headerSascha Bischoff
This header was mistakenly omitted during the creation of this file. Add it now. Better late than never. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-11-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: gic: Introduce interrupt type helpersSascha Bischoff
GICv5 has moved from using interrupt ranges for different interrupt types to using some of the upper bits of the interrupt ID to denote the interrupt type. This is not compatible with older GICs (which rely on ranges of interrupts to determine the type), and hence a set of helpers is introduced. These helpers take a struct kvm*, and use the vgic model to determine how to interpret the interrupt ID. Helpers are introduced for PPIs, SPIs, and LPIs. Additionally, a helper is introduced to determine if an interrupt is private - SGIs and PPIs for older GICs, and PPIs only for GICv5. Additionally, vgic_is_v5() is introduced (which unsurpisingly returns true when running a GICv5 guest), and the existing vgic_is_v3() check is moved from vgic.h to arm_vgic.h (to live alongside the vgic_is_v5() one), and has been converted into a macro. The helpers are plumbed into the core vgic code, as well as the Arch Timer and PMU code. There should be no functional changes as part of this change. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-10-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19arm64/sysreg: Add GICR CDNMIA encodingSascha Bischoff
The encoding for the GICR CDNMIA system instruction is thus far unused (and shall remain unused for the time being). However, in order to plumb the FGTs into KVM correctly, KVM needs to be made aware of the encoding of this system instruction. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-8-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19arm64/sysreg: Add remaining GICv5 ICC_ & ICH_ sysregs for KVM supportSascha Bischoff
Add the GICv5 system registers required to support native GICv5 guests with KVM. Many of the GICv5 sysregs have already been added as part of the host GICv5 driver, keeping this set relatively small. The registers added in this change complete the set by adding those required by KVM either directly (ICH_) or indirectly (FGTs for the ICC_ sysregs). The following system registers and their fields are added: ICC_APR_EL1 ICC_HPPIR_EL1 ICC_IAFFIDR_EL1 ICH_APR_EL2 ICH_CONTEXTR_EL2 ICH_PPI_ACTIVER<n>_EL2 ICH_PPI_DVI<n>_EL2 ICH_PPI_ENABLER<n>_EL2 ICH_PPI_PENDR<n>_EL2 ICH_PPI_PRIORITYR<n>_EL2 Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-7-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: vgic: Split out mapping IRQs and setting irq_opsSascha Bischoff
Prior to this change, the act of mapping a virtual IRQ to a physical one also set the irq_ops. Unmapping then reset the irq_ops to NULL. So far, this has been fine and hasn't caused any major issues. Now, however, as GICv5 support is being added to KVM, it has become apparent that conflating mapping/unmapping IRQs and setting/clearing irq_ops can cause issues. The reason is that the upcoming GICv5 support introduces a set of default irq_ops for PPIs, and removing this when unmapping will cause things to break rather horribly. Split out the mapping/unmapping of IRQs from the setting/clearing of irq_ops. The arch timer code is updated to set the irq_ops following a successful map. The irq_ops are intentionally not removed again on an unmap as the only irq_op introduced by the arch timer only takes effect if the hw bit in struct vgic_irq is set. Therefore, it is safe to leave this in place, and it avoids additional complexity when GICv5 support is introduced. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-6-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: Return early from kvm_finalize_sys_regs() if guest has runSascha Bischoff
If the guest has already run, we have no business finalizing the system register state - it is too late. Therefore, check early and bail if the VM has already run. This change also stops kvm_init_nv_sysregs() from being called once the RM has run once. Although this looks like a behavioural change, the function returns early once it has been called the first time. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-4-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: vgic: Rework vgic_is_v3() and add vgic_host_has_gicvX()Sascha Bischoff
The GIC version checks used to determine host capabilities and guest configuration have become somewhat conflated (in part due to the addition of GICv5 support). vgic_is_v3() is a prime example, which prior to this change has been a combination of guest configuration and host cabability. Split out the host capability check from vgic_is_v3(), which now only checks if the vgic model itself is GICv3. Add two new functions: vgic_host_has_gicv3() and vgic_host_has_gicv5(). These explicitly check the host capabilities, i.e., can the host system run a GICvX guest or not. The vgic_is_v3() check in vcpu_set_ich_hcr() has been replaced with vgic_host_has_gicv3() as this only applies on GICv3-capable hardware, and isn't strictly only applicable for a GICv3 guest (it is actually vital for vGICv2 on GICv3 hosts). Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-3-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Drop userspace write sanitization for ID_AA64PFR0.GIC ↵Sascha Bischoff
on GICv5 Drop a check that blocked userspace writes to ID_AA64PFR0_EL1 for writes that set the GIC field to 0 (NI) on GICv5 hosts. There is no such check for GICv3 native systems, and having inconsistent behaviour both complicates the logic and risks breaking existing userspace software that expects to be able to write the register. This means that userspace is now able to create a GICv3 guest on GICv5 hosts, and disable the guest from seeing that it has a GICv3. This matches the already existing behaviour for GICv3-native VMs, allowing for fewer issues when migrating from GICv3 hosts to compatible GICv5 hosts. Additionally, this allows the trap and FGU infrastucture to kick in as these rely on the state of the feature bits that have been set. Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260319154937.3619520-2-sascha.bischoff@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-19PM: hibernate: x86: Remove inclusion of crypto/hash.hEric Biggers
hibernate_64.c does not do any cryptographic hashing, so the header crypto/hash.h is not needed at all. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> [ rjw: Subject tweak ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260314201225.38822-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-03-19arm64: realm: Fix PTE_NS_SHARED for 52bit PA supportSuzuki K Poulose
With LPA/LPA2, the top bits of the PFN (Bits[51:48]) end up in the lower bits of the PTE. So, simply creating a mask of the "top IPA bit" doesn't work well for these configurations to set the "top" bit at the output of Stage1 translation. Fix this by using the __phys_to_pte_val() to do the right thing for all configurations. Tested using, kvmtool, placing the memory at a higher address (-m <size>@<Addr>). e.g: # lkvm run --realm -c 4 -m 512M@@128T -k Image --console serial sh-5.0# dmesg | grep "LPA2\|RSI" [ 0.000000] RME: Using RSI version 1.0 [ 0.000000] CPU features: detected: 52-bit Virtual Addressing (LPA2) [ 0.777354] CPU features: detected: 52-bit Virtual Addressing for KVM (LPA2) Fixes: 399306954996 ("arm64: realm: Query IPA size from the RMM") Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2026-03-19KVM: arm64: ptdump: Make KVM ptdump code s2 mmu awareWei-Lin Chang
To reuse the ptdump code for shadow page table dumping later, let's pass s2 mmu as the private data, so we have the freedom to select which page table to print. Signed-off-by: Wei-Lin Chang <weilin.chang@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260317182638.1592507-2-weilin.chang@arm.com Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
2026-03-18arm64: defconfig: Enable configs for Arduino VENTUNO QSrinivas Kandagatla
Enable ETHERNET PHY and Analog codec configs required for Arduino VENTUNO Q board. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260313103824.2634519-8-srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
2026-03-18arm64: defconfig: Enable Qualcomm Eliza basic resource providersAbel Vesa
Enable the interconnect, pinctrl and Global Clock Controller (GCC) providers as built-in, and the Top Control and Status Register (TCSR) clock provider as module, on the Qualcomm Eliza SoC. These are all necessary in order to be able to boot up Eliza-based MTP board with debug UART and rootfs on UFS storage. Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260316-arm64-defconfig-enable-eliza-basic-providers-v1-1-7ae581670aa8@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
2026-03-18arm64: defconfig: Enable S5KJN1 camera sensorLuca Weiss
Enable the S5KJN1 driver which is used for the front camera on the Fairphone 5 smartphone. Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260313-fp5-s5kjn1-v1-3-fa4f1c727318@fairphone.com Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
2026-03-18Merge tag 'libcrypto-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux Pull crypto library fixes from Eric Biggers: - Disable the "padlock" SHA-1 and SHA-256 driver on Zhaoxin processors, since it does not compute hash values correctly - Make a generated file be removed by 'make clean' - Fix excessive stack usage in some of the arm64 AES code * tag 'libcrypto-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux: lib/crypto: powerpc: Add powerpc/aesp8-ppc.S to clean-files crypto: padlock-sha - Disable for Zhaoxin processor crypto: arm64/aes-neonbs - Move key expansion off the stack