diff options
| author | Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> | 2026-07-22 23:19:08 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> | 2026-07-24 22:34:44 +0200 |
| commit | 61aaa8782bec59ecffd22e030f54ef9351bcabf9 (patch) | |
| tree | f96e1017e023e5f630380aff70448bd860aaeab9 | |
| parent | 2805abd089576799b15092949420e3f8ba97fabd (diff) | |
| download | linux-next-61aaa8782bec59ecffd22e030f54ef9351bcabf9.tar.gz linux-next-61aaa8782bec59ecffd22e030f54ef9351bcabf9.zip | |
bpf: Fix WARNING in bpf_tracing_link_release
The trampoline could be corrupted by the blindly
'tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX' in verifier.
1. A fexit attached to a tail_call_reachable prog. 'tr->flags' became
'BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX'. And, the
trampoline would poke the target prog's nop insn using jmp insn instead
of call insn.
2. Another fexit loaded with the same tail_call_reachable prog target.
'tr->flags' became 'BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX'.
3. Close the first fexit link. Due to no BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG in
'tr->flags', the trampoline will fail to restore the prog's nop insn
using call insn.
[ 3.410719] WARNING: kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3551 at bpf_tracing_link_release+0x53/0x60, CPU#1: test_progs/98
...
[ 3.428793] bpf_link_free+0x58/0x130
[ 3.429293] bpf_link_release+0x23/0x30
Fix the warning by updating 'tr->flags' with '|=' and lock.
Fixes: 2b5dcb31a19a ("bpf, x64: Fix tailcall infinite loop")
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260722151909.69142-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/trampoline.c | 7 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 |
3 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index e066f44a9c05..7bfc28673124 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1523,6 +1523,7 @@ int bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 *ids, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link); int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *link); +void bpf_trampoline_set_flags(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 flags); /* * When the architecture supports STATIC_CALL replace the bpf_dispatcher_fn @@ -1646,6 +1647,7 @@ static inline int bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(struct bpf_prog *prog, { return -ENOTSUPP; } +static inline void bpf_trampoline_set_flags(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 flags) {} #endif struct bpf_func_info_aux { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c index 6eadf64f7ec9..129d07db117e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c @@ -670,6 +670,13 @@ out: return ERR_PTR(err); } +void bpf_trampoline_set_flags(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, u32 flags) +{ + trampoline_lock(tr); + tr->flags |= flags; + trampoline_unlock(tr); +} + static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr, bool lock_direct_mutex, const struct bpf_trampoline_ops *ops, void *data) { diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 52be0a118cce..66d8d9eaec05 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -19523,7 +19523,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return -ENOMEM; if (tgt_prog && tgt_prog->aux->tail_call_reachable) - tr->flags = BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX; + bpf_trampoline_set_flags(tr, BPF_TRAMP_F_TAIL_CALL_CTX); prog->aux->dst_trampoline = tr; return 0; |
