summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLeon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>2026-07-22 23:19:09 +0800
committerKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>2026-07-24 22:34:45 +0200
commit09e074666b7dbdaeef9107d36fb4b104d56e911e (patch)
tree89f9bf8599487a6bf02206512aa3cb7e8acabf3f
parent61aaa8782bec59ecffd22e030f54ef9351bcabf9 (diff)
downloadlinux-09e074666b7dbdaeef9107d36fb4b104d56e911e.tar.gz
linux-09e074666b7dbdaeef9107d36fb4b104d56e911e.zip
selftests/bpf: Verify no warning when close fexit link
Add a test to verify that there's no WARNING when detaching fexit link by following the repro steps of previous commit. Without the fix, the WARNING could be triggered by this test. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260722151909.69142-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c48
1 files changed, 48 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
index c66037162da5..c5c9d6c359bb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
#include "tailcall_cgrp_storage.skel.h"
#include "tailcall_sleepable.skel.h"
#include "tailcall_callback.skel.h"
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf2.skel.h"
+#include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit.skel.h"
/* test_tailcall_1 checks basic functionality by patching multiple locations
* in a single program for a single tail call slot with nop->jmp, jmp->nop
@@ -1907,6 +1909,50 @@ static void test_tailcall_callback(void)
RUN_TESTS(tailcall_callback);
}
+static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit_links(void)
+{
+ struct tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit *skel1 = NULL, *skel2 = NULL;
+ struct tailcall_bpf2bpf2 *skel_tc;
+ int err, prog_fd;
+
+ skel_tc = tailcall_bpf2bpf2__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel_tc, "tailcall_bpf2bpf2__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ skel1 = tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel1, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__open"))
+ goto out;
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel_tc->progs.classifier_0);
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(skel1->progs.fexit, prog_fd, "subprog_tail");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_attach_target"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__load(skel1);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__load"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel1->links.fexit = bpf_program__attach_trace(skel1->progs.fexit);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel1->links.fexit, "bpf_program__attach_trace"))
+ goto out;
+
+ skel2 = tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel2, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__open"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(skel2->progs.fexit, prog_fd, "subprog_tail");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_attach_target"))
+ goto out;
+
+ err = tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__load(skel2);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__load");
+
+out:
+ tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__destroy(skel1);
+ tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit__destroy(skel2);
+ tailcall_bpf2bpf2__destroy(skel_tc);
+}
+
void test_tailcalls(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
@@ -1974,4 +2020,6 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage_bridge"))
test_tailcall_cgrp_storage_no_storage_bridge();
test_tailcall_callback();
+ if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit_links"))
+ test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_fexit_links();
}