summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>2025-10-21 21:33:58 +0800
committerPing-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>2025-10-28 09:49:36 +0800
commit438c9178cd8ab629025374ea598b060024a410e7 (patch)
treefb72b8e99eecbc667b7a11f6585aa2091bea2c06
parente79382ab0347b1d7f9f26d27cb4645e4f053bcc0 (diff)
downloadlinux-438c9178cd8ab629025374ea598b060024a410e7.tar.gz
linux-438c9178cd8ab629025374ea598b060024a410e7.zip
wifi: rtw89: support EHT rate pattern via bitrate mask
When setting bitrate mask, e.g. using iw set bitrates, there are some designated patterns to be recognized, called rate pattern. When a rate pattern is matched, treat the setting as asking a fixed rate. Now, add support to recognize EHT rates. Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com> Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251021133402.15467-5-pkshih@realtek.com
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c39
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
index ba7feadd7582..23892c1359a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
@@ -231,7 +231,12 @@ static u64 rtw89_phy_ra_mask_cfg(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
return -1;
}
- if (link_sta->he_cap.has_he) {
+ if (link_sta->eht_cap.has_eht) {
+ cfg_mask |= u64_encode_bits(mask->control[band].eht_mcs[0],
+ RA_MASK_EHT_1SS_RATES);
+ cfg_mask |= u64_encode_bits(mask->control[band].eht_mcs[1],
+ RA_MASK_EHT_2SS_RATES);
+ } else if (link_sta->he_cap.has_he) {
cfg_mask |= u64_encode_bits(mask->control[band].he_mcs[0],
RA_MASK_HE_1SS_RATES);
cfg_mask |= u64_encode_bits(mask->control[band].he_mcs[1],
@@ -557,6 +562,14 @@ static bool __check_rate_pattern(struct rtw89_phy_rate_pattern *next,
return true;
}
+enum __rtw89_hw_rate_invalid_bases {
+ /* no EHT rate for ax chip */
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_EHT_NSS1_MCS0 = RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL,
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_EHT_NSS2_MCS0 = RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL,
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_EHT_NSS3_MCS0 = RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL,
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_EHT_NSS4_MCS0 = RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL,
+};
+
#define RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(rate) \
{ \
[RTW89_CHIP_AX] = RTW89_HW_RATE_ ## rate, \
@@ -572,6 +585,12 @@ void __rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
struct rtw89_phy_rate_pattern next_pattern = {0};
const struct rtw89_chan *chan = rtw89_chan_get(rtwdev,
rtwvif_link->chanctx_idx);
+ static const u16 hw_rate_eht[][RTW89_CHIP_GEN_NUM] = {
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(EHT_NSS1_MCS0),
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(EHT_NSS2_MCS0),
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(EHT_NSS3_MCS0),
+ RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(EHT_NSS4_MCS0),
+ };
static const u16 hw_rate_he[][RTW89_CHIP_GEN_NUM] = {
RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(HE_NSS1_MCS0),
RTW89_HW_RATE_BY_CHIP_GEN(HE_NSS2_MCS0),
@@ -596,6 +615,17 @@ void __rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
u8 tx_nss = rtwdev->hal.tx_nss;
u8 i;
+ if (chip_gen == RTW89_CHIP_AX)
+ goto rs_11ax;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++)
+ if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_eht[i][chip_gen],
+ RA_MASK_EHT_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_EHT,
+ mask->control[nl_band].eht_mcs[i],
+ 0, true))
+ goto out;
+
+rs_11ax:
for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++)
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_he[i][chip_gen],
RA_MASK_HE_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_HE,
@@ -640,6 +670,13 @@ void __rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
if (!next_pattern.enable)
goto out;
+ if (unlikely(next_pattern.rate >= RTW89_HW_RATE_INVAL)) {
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RA,
+ "pattern invalid target: chip_gen %d, mode 0x%x\n",
+ chip_gen, next_pattern.ra_mode);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
rtwvif_link->rate_pattern = next_pattern;
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RA,
"configure pattern: rate 0x%x, mask 0x%llx, mode 0x%x\n",