summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/scripts/checkstack.pl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>2026-06-15 18:48:56 +0200
committerBjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>2026-07-07 22:06:04 -0500
commitbb016ddb9061a89c72448f4dbe356350f5cac0ea (patch)
tree342cf4593d9276ba2ea73562506ffd9e7dfe62eb /scripts/checkstack.pl
parent83f13e07c5216058ccf53bfe08dd5c57e28e747a (diff)
downloadlinux-bb016ddb9061a89c72448f4dbe356350f5cac0ea.tar.gz
linux-bb016ddb9061a89c72448f4dbe356350f5cac0ea.zip
arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: update the cpus capacity-dmips-mhz
After some more advanced benchmarks with Integer, Floaring Point, Encryption, Compression, NEON, ... on the A520, A720 and X4 cpus, the median gain with the same frequency range is: - 281% of A720 over A520 - 126% of X4 over A720 When adjusted with the frequency delta, we get better values describing the difference in capacity, showing the weakness of the A520 designed for very small tasks while the A720 and X4 are much more powerful. Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260615-topic-sm8650-upstream-cpu-props-v3-1-eeb6e9fa7581@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/checkstack.pl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions