summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-06-08cpufreq: Remove driver default policy->min/max initPierre Gondois
Prior to commit 521223d8b3ec ("cpufreq: Fix initialization of min and max frequency QoS requests"), drivers were setting policy->min/max and these values were used as initial policy QoS constraints. After the above commit, these values are only used temporarily, as cpufreq_set_policy() ultimately overrides them through: cpufreq_policy_online() \-cpufreq_init_policy() \-cpufreq_set_policy() \-/* Set policy->min/max */ A subsequent change will restore the previous behavior allowing drivers to request special min/max QoS frequencies instead of FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE and FREQ_QOS_MAX_DEFAULT_VALUE, respectively, if desired. For instance, the CPPC driver wants to advertise the lowest non-linear frequency that should be used as the initial minimum frequency QoS request. However, for this purpose, all drivers setting policy->min/max to policy->cpuinfo.min/max_freq, respectively, need to be updated so their initial policy->min/max settings don't limit the frequency scaling unnecessarily going forward (which would defeat the purpose of commit 521223d8b3ec), so do that. This does not actually alter the observed behavior of all of the drivers in question because setting policy->min/max to policy->cpuinfo.min/max_freq, respectively, is not necessary or even useful any more after a previous change ("cpufreq: Set default policy->min/max values for all drivers"). Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Acked-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> [ rjw: Changelog rewrite ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260528090913.2759118-4-pierre.gondois@arm.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-05-20cpufreq: cppc: mask Desired_Excursion when autonomous selection is enabledXueqin Luo
According to the ACPI 6.6 specification, the Desired_Excursion field is not utilized when autonomous selection is enabled. In this mode, the bit is architecturally ignored and does not carry meaningful information. Currently, the kernel exposes the raw Performance Limited register value to userspace through the cpufreq sysfs interface. This may lead to misinterpretation, as userspace may assume Desired_Excursion is valid even when autonomous selection is active. To provide a stable and semantically correct ABI, mask out the Desired_Excursion bit when autonomous selection is enabled, so that userspace does not observe undefined or misleading values. Writes are left unchanged, as the field is architecturally ignored in this mode and write attempts are harmless. Signed-off-by: Xueqin Luo <luoxueqin@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2026-04-13Merge tag 'pm-7.1-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm Pull power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "Once again, cpufreq is the most active development area, mostly because of the new feature additions and documentation updates in the amd-pstate driver, but there are also changes in the cpufreq core related to boost support and other assorted updates elsewhere. Next up are power capping changes due to the major cleanup of the Intel RAPL driver. On the cpuidle front, a new C-states table for Intel Panther Lake is added to the intel_idle driver, the stopped tick handling in the menu and teo governors is updated, and there are a couple of cleanups. Apart from the above, support for Tegra114 is added to devfreq and there are assorted cleanups of that code, there are also two updates of the operating performance points (OPP) library, two minor updates related to hibernation, and cpupower utility man pages updates and cleanups. Specifics: - Update qcom-hw DT bindings to include Eliza hardware (Abel Vesa) - Update cpufreq-dt-platdev blocklist (Faruque Ansari) - Minor updates to driver and dt-bindings for Tegra (Thierry Reding, Rosen Penev) - Add MAINTAINERS entry for CPPC driver (Viresh Kumar) - Add support for new features: CPPC performance priority, Dynamic EPP, Raw EPP, and new unit tests for them to amd-pstate (Gautham Shenoy, Mario Limonciello) - Fix sysfs files being present when HW missing and broken/outdated documentation in the amd-pstate driver (Ninad Naik, Gautham Shenoy) - Pass the policy to cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf() to avoid using cpufreq_cpu_get() in the .adjust_perf() callback in amd-pstate which leads to a scheduling-while-atomic bug (K Prateek Nayak) - Clean up dead code in Kconfig for cpufreq (Julian Braha) - Remove max_freq_req update for pre-existing cpufreq policy and add a boost_freq_req QoS request to save the boost constraint instead of overwriting the last scaling_max_freq constraint (Pierre Gondois) - Embed cpufreq QoS freq_req objects in cpufreq policy so they all are allocated in one go along with the policy to simplify lifetime rules and avoid error handling issues (Viresh Kumar) - Use DMI max speed when CPPC is unavailable in the acpi-cpufreq scaling driver (Henry Tseng) - Switch policy_is_shared() in cpufreq to using cpumask_nth() instead of cpumask_weight() because the former is more efficient (Yury Norov) - Use sysfs_emit() in sysfs show functions for cpufreq governor attributes (Thorsten Blum) - Update intel_pstate to stop returning an error when "off" is written to its status sysfs attribute while the driver is already off (Fabio De Francesco) - Include current frequency in the debug message printed by __cpufreq_driver_target() (Pengjie Zhang) - Refine stopped tick handling in the menu cpuidle governor and rearrange stopped tick handling in the teo cpuidle governor (Rafael Wysocki) - Add Panther Lake C-states table to the intel_idle driver (Artem Bityutskiy) - Clean up dead dependencies on CPU_IDLE in Kconfig (Julian Braha) - Simplify cpuidle_register_device() with guard() (Huisong Li) - Use performance level if available to distinguish between rates in OPP debugfs (Manivannan Sadhasivam) - Fix scoped_guard in dev_pm_opp_xlate_required_opp() (Viresh Kumar) - Return -ENODATA if the snapshot image is not loaded (Alberto Garcia) - Remove inclusion of crypto/hash.h from hibernate_64.c on x86 (Eric Biggers) - Clean up and rearrange the intel_rapl power capping driver to make the respective interface drivers (TPMI, MSR, and MMOI) hold their own settings and primitives and consolidate PL4 and PMU support flags into rapl_defaults (Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan) - Correct kernel-doc function parameter names in the power capping core code (Randy Dunlap) - Remove unneeded casting for HZ_PER_KHZ in devfreq (Andy Shevchenko) - Use _visible attribute to replace create/remove_sysfs_files() in devfreq (Pengjie Zhang) - Add Tegra114 support to activity monitor device in tegra30-devfreq as a preparation to upcoming EMC controller support (Svyatoslav Ryhel) - Fix mistakes in cpupower man pages, add the boost and epp options to the cpupower-frequency-info man page, and add the perf-bias option to the cpupower-info man page (Roberto Ricci) - Remove unnecessary extern declarations from getopt.h in arguments parsing functions in cpufreq-set, cpuidle-info, cpuidle-set, cpupower-info, and cpupower-set utilities (Kaushlendra Kumar)" * tag 'pm-7.1-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (74 commits) cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add POWER_SUPPLY select for dynamic EPP cpupower: remove extern declarations in cmd functions cpuidle: Simplify cpuidle_register_device() with guard() PM / devfreq: tegra30-devfreq: add support for Tegra114 PM / devfreq: use _visible attribute to replace create/remove_sysfs_files() PM / devfreq: Remove unneeded casting for HZ_PER_KHZ MAINTAINERS: amd-pstate: Step down as maintainer, add Prateek as reviewer cpufreq: Pass the policy to cpufreq_driver->adjust_perf() cpufreq/amd-pstate: Pass the policy to amd_pstate_update() cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Add a unit test for raw EPP cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add support for raw EPP writes cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add support for platform profile class cpufreq/amd-pstate: add kernel command line to override dynamic epp cpufreq/amd-pstate: Add dynamic energy performance preference Documentation: amd-pstate: fix dead links in the reference section cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache the max frequency in cpudata Documentation/amd-pstate: Add documentation for amd_pstate_floor_{freq,count} Documentation/amd-pstate: List amd_pstate_prefcore_ranking sysfs file Documentation/amd-pstate: List amd_pstate_hw_prefcore sysfs file amd-pstate-ut: Add a testcase to validate the visibility of driver attributes ...
2026-03-30cpufreq: Add boost_freq_req QoS requestPierre Gondois
The Power Management Quality of Service (PM QoS) allows to aggregate constraints from multiple entities. It is currently used to manage the min/max frequency of a given policy. Frequency constraints can come for instance from: - Thermal framework: acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init() - Firmware: _PPC objects: acpi_processor_ppc_init() - User: by setting policyX/scaling_[min|max]_freq The minimum of the max frequency constraints is used to compute the resulting maximum allowed frequency. When enabling boost frequencies, the same frequency request object (policy->max_freq_req) as to handle requests from users is used. As a result, when setting: - scaling_max_freq - boost The last sysfs file used overwrites the request from the other sysfs file. To avoid this, create a per-policy boost_freq_req to save the boost constraints instead of overwriting the last scaling_max_freq constraint. policy_set_boost() calls the cpufreq set_boost callback. Update the newly added boost_freq_req request from there: - whenever boost is toggled - to cover all possible paths In the existing .set_boost() callbacks: - Don't update policy->max as this is done through the qos notifier cpufreq_notifier_max() which calls cpufreq_set_policy(). - Remove freq_qos_update_request() calls as the qos request is now done in policy_set_boost() and updates the new boost_freq_req $ ## Init state scaling_max_freq:1000000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1000000 $ echo 700000 > scaling_max_freq scaling_max_freq:700000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1000000 $ echo 1 > ../boost scaling_max_freq:1200000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1200000 $ echo 800000 > scaling_max_freq scaling_max_freq:800000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1200000 $ ## Final step: $ ## Without the patches: $ echo 0 > ../boost scaling_max_freq:1000000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1000000 $ ## With the patches: $ echo 0 > ../boost scaling_max_freq:800000 cpuinfo_max_freq:1000000 Note: cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() updates policy->min and max from: A. cpufreq_boost_set_sw() \-cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() B. cpufreq_policy_online() \-cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() \-cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() Keep these updates as some drivers expect policy->min and max to be set through B. Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260326204404.1401849-3-pierre.gondois@arm.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-03-05ACPI: CPPC: Move reference performance to capabilitiesPengjie Zhang
Currently, the `Reference Performance` register is read every time the CPU frequency is sampled in `cppc_get_perf_ctrs()`. This function is on the hot path of the cppc_cpufreq driver. Reference Performance indicates the performance level that corresponds to the Reference Counter incrementing and is not expected to change dynamically during runtime (unlike the Delivered and Reference counters). Reading this register in the hot path incurs unnecessary overhead, particularly on platforms where CPC registers are located in the PCC (Platform Communication Channel) subspace. This patch moves `reference_perf` from the dynamic feedback counters structure (`cppc_perf_fb_ctrs`) to the static capabilities structure (`cppc_perf_caps`). Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Changelog adjustment ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260213100935.19111-1-zhangpengjie2@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-02-27ACPI: CPPC: add APIs and sysfs interface for perf_limitedSumit Gupta
Add sysfs interface to read/write the Performance Limited register. The Performance Limited register indicates to the OS that an unpredictable event (like thermal throttling) has limited processor performance. It contains two sticky bits set by the platform: - Bit 0 (Desired_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is constrained below desired performance. Not used when Autonomous Selection is enabled. - Bit 1 (Minimum_Excursion): Set when delivered performance is constrained below minimum performance. These bits remain set until OSPM explicitly clears them. The write operation accepts a bitmask of bits to clear: - Write 0x1 to clear bit 0 - Write 0x2 to clear bit 1 - Write 0x3 to clear both bits This enables users to detect if platform throttling impacted a workload. Users clear the register before execution, run the workload, then check afterward - if set, hardware throttling occurred during that time window. The interface is exposed as: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/perf_limited Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260206142658.72583-7-sumitg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-02-27cpufreq: cppc: Update MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF in target callbacksSumit Gupta
Update MIN_PERF and MAX_PERF registers from policy->min and policy->max in the .target() and .fast_switch() callbacks. This allows controlling performance bounds via standard scaling_min_freq and scaling_max_freq sysfs interfaces. Similar to intel_cpufreq which updates HWP min/max limits in .target(), cppc_cpufreq now programs MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF along with DESIRED_PERF. Since MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF can be updated even when auto_sel is disabled, they are updated unconditionally. Also program MIN_PERF/MAX_PERF in store_auto_select() when enabling autonomous selection so the platform uses correct bounds immediately. Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260206142658.72583-6-sumitg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-02-27cpufreq: CPPC: Update cached perf_ctrls on sysfs writeSumit Gupta
Update the cached perf_ctrls values when writing via sysfs to keep them in sync with hardware registers: - store_auto_select(): update perf_ctrls.auto_sel - store_energy_performance_preference_val(): update perf_ctrls.energy_perf This ensures consistent cached values after sysfs writes, which complements the cppc_get_perf() initialization during policy setup. Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260206142658.72583-5-sumitg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-02-27ACPI: CPPC: Add cppc_get_perf() API to read performance controlsSumit Gupta
Add cppc_get_perf() function to read values of performance control registers including desired_perf, min_perf, max_perf, energy_perf, and auto_sel. This provides a read interface to complement the existing cppc_set_perf() write interface for performance control registers. Note that auto_sel is read by cppc_get_perf() but not written by cppc_set_perf() to avoid unintended mode changes during performance updates. It can be updated with existing dedicated cppc_set_auto_sel() API. Use cppc_get_perf() in cppc_cpufreq_get_cpu_data() to initialize perf_ctrls with current hardware register values during cpufreq policy initialization. Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260206142658.72583-2-sumitg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-02-21Convert 'alloc_obj' family to use the new default GFP_KERNEL argumentLinus Torvalds
This was done entirely with mindless brute force, using git grep -l '\<k[vmz]*alloc_objs*(.*, GFP_KERNEL)' | xargs sed -i 's/\(alloc_objs*(.*\), GFP_KERNEL)/\1)/' to convert the new alloc_obj() users that had a simple GFP_KERNEL argument to just drop that argument. Note that due to the extreme simplicity of the scripting, any slightly more complex cases spread over multiple lines would not be triggered: they definitely exist, but this covers the vast bulk of the cases, and the resulting diff is also then easier to check automatically. For the same reason the 'flex' versions will be done as a separate conversion. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2026-02-21treewide: Replace kmalloc with kmalloc_obj for non-scalar typesKees Cook
This is the result of running the Coccinelle script from scripts/coccinelle/api/kmalloc_objs.cocci. The script is designed to avoid scalar types (which need careful case-by-case checking), and instead replace kmalloc-family calls that allocate struct or union object instances: Single allocations: kmalloc(sizeof(TYPE), ...) are replaced with: kmalloc_obj(TYPE, ...) Array allocations: kmalloc_array(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE), ...) are replaced with: kmalloc_objs(TYPE, COUNT, ...) Flex array allocations: kmalloc(struct_size(PTR, FAM, COUNT), ...) are replaced with: kmalloc_flex(*PTR, FAM, COUNT, ...) (where TYPE may also be *VAR) The resulting allocations no longer return "void *", instead returning "TYPE *". Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
2026-01-28cpufreq: CPPC: Add generic helpers for sysfs show/storeSumit Gupta
Add generic helper functions for u64 sysfs attributes that follow the common pattern of calling CPPC get/set APIs: - cppc_cpufreq_sysfs_show_u64(): reads value and handles -EOPNOTSUPP - cppc_cpufreq_sysfs_store_u64(): parses input and calls set function Add CPPC_CPUFREQ_ATTR_RW_U64() macro to generate show/store functions using these helpers, reducing boilerplate for simple attributes. Convert auto_act_window and energy_performance_preference_val to use the new macro. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> [ rjw: Retained empty code line after a conditional ] Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260120145623.2959636-2-sumitg@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2026-01-27cpufreq: CPPC: Update FIE arch_freq_scale in ticks for non-PCC regsJie Zhan
Currently, the CPPC Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is invoked from the scheduler tick but defers the update of arch_freq_scale to a separate thread because cppc_get_perf_ctrs() would sleep if the CPC regs are in PCC. However, this deferred update mechanism is unnecessary and introduces extra overhead for non-PCC register spaces (e.g. System Memory or FFH), where accessing the regs won't sleep and can be safely performed from the tick context. Furthermore, with the CPPC FIE registered, it throws repeated warnings of "cppc_scale_freq_workfn: failed to read perf counters" on our platform with the CPC regs in System Memory and a power-down idle state enabled. That's because the remote CPU can be in a power-down idle state, and reading its perf counters returns 0. Moving the FIE handling back to the scheduler tick process makes the CPU handle its own perf counters, so it won't be idle and the issue would be inherently solved. To address the above issues, update arch_freq_scale directly in ticks for non-PCC regs and keep the deferred update mechanism for PCC regs. Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2026-01-27cpufreq: CPPC: Factor out cppc_fie_kworker_init()Jie Zhan
Factor out the CPPC FIE kworker init in cppc_freq_invariance_init() because it's a standalone procedure for use when the CPC regs are in PCC channels. Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-10-28cpufreq: CPPC: Don't warn if FIE init fails to read countersJie Zhan
During the CPPC FIE initialization, reading perf counters on offline cpus should be expected to fail. Don't warn on this case. Also, change the error log level to debug since FIE is optional. Co-developed-by: Bowen Yu <yubowen8@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bowen Yu <yubowen8@huawei.com> # Changing loglevel to debug Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> [ Viresh: Added back the dropped comment. ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-10-01ACPI: CPPC: Do not use CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as an error valueRafael J. Wysocki
Instead of using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL for signaling an error condition in cppc_get_transition_latency(), change the return value type of that function to int and make it return a proper negative error code on failures. No intentional functional impact. Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
2025-10-01cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid using CPUFREQ_ETERNAL as transition delayRafael J. Wysocki
If cppc_get_transition_latency() returns CPUFREQ_ETERNAL to indicate a failure to retrieve the transition latency value from the platform firmware, the CPPC cpufreq driver will use that value (converted to microseconds) as the policy transition delay, but it is way too large for any practical use. Address this by making the driver use the cpufreq's default transition latency value (in microseconds) as the transition delay if CPUFREQ_ETERNAL is returned by cppc_get_transition_latency(). Fixes: d4f3388afd48 ("cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_us") Cc: 5.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.19 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
2025-08-29cpufreq: CPPC: Use scope-based cleanup helperZihuan Zhang
Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy) annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn> [ Viresh: Minor changes ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-08-11cpufreq: Remove unused parameter in cppc_perf_from_fbctrs()BowenYu
Remove the unused parameter cppc_cpudata* cpu_data in cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(). Signed-off-by: BowenYu <yubowen8@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-07-22cpufreq: CPPC: Mark driver with NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS flagPrashant Malani
AMU counters on certain CPPC-based platforms tend to yield inaccurate delivered performance measurements on systems that are idle/mostly idle. This results in an inaccurate frequency being stored by cpufreq in its policy structure when the CPU is brought online. [1] Consequently, if the userspace governor tries to set the frequency to a new value, there is a possibility that it would be the erroneous value stored earlier. In such a scenario, cpufreq would assume that the requested frequency has already been set and return early, resulting in the correct/new frequency request never making it to the hardware. Since the operating frequency is liable to this sort of inconsistency, mark the CPPC driver with CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS so that it is always invoked when a target frequency update is requested. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250619000925.415528-3-pmalani@google.com/ [1] Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Prashant Malani <pmalani@google.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250722055611.130574-2-pmalani@google.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-06-18cpufreq: CPPC: Remove forward declaration of cppc_cpufreq_register_em()Lifeng Zheng
cppc_cpufreq_register_em() is only used in populate_efficiency_class(). A forward declaration of it is not necessary. Move cppc_cpufreq_register_em() in front of populate_efficiency_class() and remove the forward declaration of cppc_cpufreq_register_em(). No functional change. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250526113057.3086513-4-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-06-18cpufreq: CPPC: Do not return a value from populate_efficiency_class()Lifeng Zheng
The return value of populate_efficiency_class() is never needed and the result of it doesn't affect the initialization of cppc_cpufreq. It makes more sense to change it into a void function. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250526113057.3086513-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-06-18cpufreq: CPPC: Remove cpu_data_listLifeng Zheng
After commit a28b2bfc099c ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list"), cpu_data can be got from policy->driver_data, so cpu_data_list is not actually needed and can be removed. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250526113057.3086513-2-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-05-21cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for autonomous selectionLifeng Zheng
Add sysfs interfaces for CPPC autonomous selection in the cppc_cpufreq driver. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250507031941.2812701-1-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: Subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-04-16cpufreq: cppc: Fix invalid return value in .get() callbackMarc Zyngier
Returning a negative error code in a function with an unsigned return type is a pretty bad idea. It is probably worse when the justification for the change is "our static analisys tool found it". Fixes: cf7de25878a1 ("cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereference") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-02-07cpufreq: cppc: Set policy->boost_supportedViresh Kumar
With a later commit, the cpufreq core will call the ->set_boost() callback only if the policy supports boost frequency. The boost_supported flag is set by the cpufreq core if policy->freq_table is set and one or more boost frequencies are present. For other drivers, the flag must be set explicitly. With this, the local variable boost_supported isn't required anymore. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2025-01-23cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong max_freq in policy initializationLifeng Zheng
In policy initialization, policy->max and policy->cpuinfo.max_freq are always set to the value calculated from caps->nominal_perf. This will cause the frequency stay on base frequency even if the policy is already boosted when a CPU is going online. Fix this by using policy->boost_enabled to determine which value should be set. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250117101457.1530653-4-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: Changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2025-01-08treewide: Introduce kthread_run_worker[_on_cpu]()Frederic Weisbecker
kthread_create() creates a kthread without running it yet. kthread_run() creates a kthread and runs it. On the other hand, kthread_create_worker() creates a kthread worker and runs it. This difference in behaviours is confusing. Also there is no way to create a kthread worker and affine it using kthread_bind_mask() or kthread_affine_preferred() before starting it. Consolidate the behaviours and introduce kthread_run_worker[_on_cpu]() that behaves just like kthread_run(). kthread_create_worker[_on_cpu]() will now only create a kthread worker without starting it. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
2024-11-19Merge tag 'cpufreq-arm-updates-6.13' of ↵Rafael J. Wysocki
ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm Merge ARM cpufreq updates for 6.13 from Viresh Kumar: "- Add virtual cpufreq driver for guest kernels (David Dai). - Minor cleanup to various cpufreq drivers (Andy Shevchenko, Dhruva Gole, Jie Zhan, Jinjie Ruan, Shuosheng Huang, Sibi Sankar, and Yuan Can). - Revert "cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix initial command check" (Colin Ian King). - Improve DT bindings for qcom-hw driver (Dmitry Baryshkov, Konrad Dybcio, and Nikunj Kela)." * tag 'cpufreq-arm-updates-6.13' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm: arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Add a SoC-specific compatible to cpufreq-hw dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SC8180X compatible cpufreq: sun50i: add a100 cpufreq support cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Fix wrong return value in mtk_cpufreq_get_cpu_power() cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_power() cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_cost() cpufreq: loongson3: Check for error code from devm_mutex_init() call cpufreq: scmi: Fix cleanup path when boost enablement fails cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cppc_get_cpu_cost() cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() Revert "cpufreq: brcmstb-avs-cpufreq: Fix initial command check" dt-bindings: cpufreq: cpufreq-qcom-hw: Add SAR2130P compatible cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver dt-bindings: cpufreq: add virtual cpufreq device cpufreq: loongson2: Unregister platform_driver on failure cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Remove revision offsets in AM62 family cpufreq: ti-cpufreq: Allow backward compatibility for efuse syscon cppc_cpufreq: Remove HiSilicon CPPC workaround cppc_cpufreq: Use desired perf if feedback ctrs are 0 or unchanged dt-bindings: cpufreq: qcom-hw: document support for SA8255p
2024-11-11cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_power()Jinjie Ruan
cppc_get_cpu_power() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in em_create_perf_table(), the later zero check for power is not valid as power is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model core check the return value of active_power() first, so if the callback failed it should tell the core. So return -EINVAL to fix it. Fixes: a78e72075642 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-11-11cpufreq: CPPC: Fix wrong return value in cppc_get_cpu_cost()Jinjie Ruan
cppc_get_cpu_cost() return 0 if the policy is NULL. Then in em_compute_costs(), the later zero check for cost is not valid as cost is uninitialized. As Quentin pointed out, kernel energy model core check the return value of get_cost() first, so if the callback failed it should tell the core. Return -EINVAL to fix it. Fixes: 1a1374bb8c59 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cppc_get_cpu_cost()") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c4765377-7830-44c2-84fa-706b6e304e10@stanley.mountain/ Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-10-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cppc_get_cpu_cost()Jinjie Ruan
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference, so check NULL for cppc_get_cpu_cost(). Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-10-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix possible null-ptr-deref for cpufreq_cpu_get_raw()Jinjie Ruan
cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() may return NULL if the cpu is not in policy->cpus cpu mask and it will cause null pointer dereference. Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-10-03cppc_cpufreq: Remove HiSilicon CPPC workaroundJie Zhan
Since commit 6c8d750f9784 ("cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC cpufreq"), we introduce a workround for HiSilicon platforms that do not support performance feedback counters, whereas they can get the actual frequency from the desired perf register. Later on, FIE is disabled in that workaround as well. Now the workround can be handled by the common code. Desired perf would be read and converted to frequency if feedback counters don't change. FIE would be disabled if the CPPC regs are in PCC region. Hence, the workaround is no longer needed and can be safely removed, in an effort to consolidate the driver procedure. Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Reviewed-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> [ Viresh: Move fie_disabled withing CONFIG option to fix warning ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-10-03cppc_cpufreq: Use desired perf if feedback ctrs are 0 or unchangedJie Zhan
The CPPC performance feedback counters could be 0 or unchanged when the target cpu is in a low-power idle state, e.g. power-gated or clock-gated. When the counters are 0, cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns 0 KHz, which makes cpufreq_online() get a false error and fail to generate a cpufreq policy. When the counters are unchanged, the existing cppc_perf_from_fbctrs() returns a cached desired perf, but some platforms may update the real frequency back to the desired perf reg. For the above cases in cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(), get the latest desired perf from the CPPC reg to reflect the frequency because some platforms may update the actual frequency back there; if failed, use the cached desired perf. Fixes: 6a4fec4f6d30 ("cpufreq: cppc: cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns zero in all error cases.") Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com> Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-10-02move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.hAl Viro
asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h; might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include that - there's nothing arch-specific in that header. auto-generated by the following: for i in `git grep -l -w asm/unaligned.h`; do sed -i -e "s/asm\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i done for i in `git grep -l -w asm-generic/unaligned.h`; do sed -i -e "s/asm-generic\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i done git mv include/asm-generic/unaligned.h include/linux/unaligned.h git mv tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h sed -i -e "/unaligned.h/d" include/asm-generic/Kbuild sed -i -e "s/__ASM_GENERIC/__LINUX/" include/linux/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
2024-09-11cpufreq/cppc: Use NSEC_PER_MSEC for deadline taskChristian Loehle
Convert the cppc deadline task attributes to use the available definitions to make them more readable. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813144348.1180344-4-christian.loehle@arm.com
2024-07-09cpufreq: Make cpufreq_driver->exit() return voidLizhe
The cpufreq core doesn't check the return type of the exit() callback and there is not much the core can do on failures at that point. Just drop the returned value and make it return void. Signed-off-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com> [ Viresh: Reworked the patches to fix all missing changes together. ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> # Mediatek Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> # scpi, scmi, vexpress Acked-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> # amd Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> # bmips Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> # omap
2024-06-13cpufreq/cppc: Don't compare desired_perf in target()Riwen Lu
There is a corner case where the desired_perf is exactly same as the old perf, but the actual current freq is not. This happens during S3 while the cpufreq governor is set to powersave. During cpufreq resume process, the booting CPU's new_freq obtained via .get() is the highest frequency, while the policy->cur and cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf are set to the lowest level (powersave governor). This causes the warning: "CPU frequency out of sync:", and the cpufreq core sets policy->cur to new_freq. Then the governor->limits() calls cppc_cpufreq_set_target() to configures the CPU frequency and returns directly because the desired_perf converted from target_freq is same as the cpu->perf_ctrls.desired_perf and both are the lowest_perf. Since target_freq and policy->cur have been already compared in __cpufreq_driver_target(), there's no need to compare them again here. Drop the comparison. Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn> [ Viresh: Updated commit message / subject ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2024-04-19cppc_cpufreq: Fix possible null pointer dereferenceAleksandr Mishin
cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() and hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() can be called from different places with various parameters. So cpufreq_cpu_get() can return null as 'policy' in some circumstances. Fix this bug by adding null return check. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: a28b2bfc099c ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list") Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2023-12-23cpufreq/cppc: Move and rename cppc_cpufreq_{perf_to_khz|khz_to_perf}()Vincent Guittot
Move and rename cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() and cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf() to use them outside cppc_cpufreq in topology_init_cpu_capacity_cppc(). Modify the interface to use struct cppc_perf_caps *caps instead of struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data as we only use the fields of cppc_perf_caps. cppc_cpufreq was converting the lowest and nominal freq from MHz to kHz before using them. We move this conversion inside cppc_perf_to_khz and cppc_khz_to_perf to make them generic and usable outside cppc_cpufreq. No functional change Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211104855.558096-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
2023-08-17cpufreq: cppc: Set fie_disabled to FIE_DISABLED if fails to create kworker_fieLiao Chang
The function cppc_freq_invariance_init() may failed to create kworker_fie, make it more robust by setting fie_disabled to FIE_DISBALED to prevent an invalid pointer dereference in kthread_destroy_worker(), which called from cppc_freq_invariance_exit(). Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2023-08-17cpufreq: cppc: cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() returns zero in all error cases.Liao Chang
The cpufreq framework used to use the zero of return value to reflect the cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() had failed to get current frequecy and treat all positive integer to be succeed. Since cppc_get_perf_ctrs() returns a negative integer in error case, so it is better to convert the value to zero as the return value of cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(). Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2022-12-27cpufreq: CPPC: Add u64 casts to avoid overflowingPierre Gondois
The fields of the _CPC object are unsigned 32-bits values. To avoid overflows while using _CPC's values, add 'u64' casts. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2022-09-24ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regionsJeremy Linton
PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Finally, add a module parameter which can override the PCC region detection at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-08-25ACPI: CPPC: Add ACPI disabled check to acpi_cpc_valid()Perry Yuan
Make acpi_cpc_valid() check if ACPI is disabled, so that its callers don't need to check that separately. This will also cause the AMD pstate driver to refuse to load right away when ACPI is disabled. Also update the warning message in amd_pstate_init() to mention the ACPI disabled case for completeness. Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject edits, new changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix unused-function warningPierre Gondois
Building the cppc_cpufreq driver with for arm64 with CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=n triggers the following warnings: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:550:12: error: ‘cppc_get_cpu_cost’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 550 | static int cppc_get_cpu_cost(struct device *cpu_dev, unsigned long KHz, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:481:12: error: ‘cppc_get_cpu_power’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 481 | static int cppc_get_cpu_power(struct device *cpu_dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Move the Energy Model related functions into specific guards. This allows to fix the warning and prevent doing extra work when the Energy Model is not present. Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Reported-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Tested-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix build error without CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIEZheng Bin
If CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE is not set, building fails: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c: In function ‘populate_efficiency_class’: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:584:2: error: ‘cppc_cpufreq_driver’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cpufreq_driver’? cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cpufreq_driver Make declare of cppc_cpufreq_driver out of CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE to fix this. Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19cpufreq: CPPC: Enable dvfs_possible_from_any_cpuPierre Gondois
The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware (FFH). PCC, SystemMemory and SystemIo address spaces are available from any CPU. Thus, dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu should be enabled in such case. For FFH, let the FFH implementation do smp_call_function_*() calls. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19cpufreq: CPPC: Enable fast_switchPierre Gondois
The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware. commit b7898fda5bc7 ("cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching") fast_switching is 'for switching CPU frequencies from interrupt context'. Writes to SystemMemory and SystemIo are fast and suitable this. This is not the case for PCC and might not be the case for FFH. Enable fast_switching for the cppc_cpufreq driver in above cases. Add cppc_allow_fast_switch() to check the desired performance register address space and set fast_switching accordingly. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>