summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/space-info.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2026-06-09btrfs: zoned: fix deadlock waiting for ticket during data relocationJohannes Thumshirn
When performing data relocation on a zoned filesystem, BTRFS can deadlock in handle_reserve_tickets(). The relocation process is waiting on a space reservation ticket that can never be fulfilled, because the relocation itself is the operation responsible for freeing up that space. Fix this by introducing a new flush state, BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ZONED_RELOCATION, specifically for data chunk allocation during zoned relocation. Like BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_FREE_SPACE_INODE, this state uses priority_reclaim_data_space() instead of the normal flushing path, which avoids re-entering the relocation code and breaking the deadlock cycle. In btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(), select this new flush state when the inode belongs to a data relocation root on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: e2a7fd22378f ("btrfs: zoned: add zone reclaim flush state for DATA space_info") Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2026-04-07btrfs: constify arguments of some functionsFilipe Manana
There are several functions that take pointer arguments but don't need to modify the objects they point to, so add the const qualifiers. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2026-04-07btrfs: zoned: add zone reclaim flush state for DATA space_infoJohannes Thumshirn
On zoned block devices, DATA block groups can accumulate large amounts of zone_unusable space (space between the write pointer and zone end). When zone_unusable reaches high levels (e.g., 98% of total space), new allocations fail with ENOSPC even though space could be reclaimed by relocating data and resetting zones. The existing flush states don't handle this scenario effectively - they either try to free cached space (which doesn't exist for zone_unusable) or reset empty zones (which doesn't help when zones contain valid data mixed with zone_unusable space). Add a new RECLAIM_ZONES flush state that triggers the block group reclaim machinery. This state: - Calls btrfs_reclaim_sweep() to identify reclaimable block groups - Calls btrfs_reclaim_bgs() to queue reclaim work - Waits for reclaim_bgs_work to complete via flush_work() - Commits the transaction to finalize changes The reclaim work (btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work) safely relocates valid data from fragmented block groups to other locations before resetting zones, converting zone_unusable space back into usable space. Insert RECLAIM_ZONES before RESET_ZONES in data_flush_states so that we attempt to reclaim partially-used block groups before falling back to resetting completely empty ones. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2026-04-07btrfs: update comment for BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSHFilipe Manana
The comment is incomplete as BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH is used for more reasons than currently holding a transaction handle open. Update the comment with all the other reasons and give some details. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2026-02-03btrfs: move space_info_flag_to_str() to space-info.hJohannes Thumshirn
Move space_info_flag_to_str() to space-info.h and as it now isn't static to space-info.c any more prefix it with 'btrfs_'. This way it can be re-used in other places. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: move struct reserve_ticket definition to space-info.cFilipe Manana
It's not used anywhere outside space-info.c so move it from space-info.h into space-info.c. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: avoid space_info locking when checking if tickets are servedFilipe Manana
When checking if a ticket was served, we take the space_info's spinlock. If the ticket was served (its ->bytes is 0) or had an error (its ->error it not 0) then we just unlock the space_info and return. This however causes contention on the space_info's spinlock, which is heavily used (space reservation, space flushing, allocating and deallocating an extent from a block group (btrfs_update_block_group()), etc). Instead of using the space_info's spinlock to check if a ticket was served, use a per ticket spinlock which isn't used by anyone other than the task that created the ticket (stack allocated) and the task that serves the ticket (a reclaim task or any task deallocating space that ends up at btrfs_try_granting_tickets()). After applying this patch and all previous patches from the same patchset (many attempt to reduce space_info critical sections), lockstat showed some improvements for a fs_mark test regarding the space_info's spinlock 'lock'. The lockstat results: Before patchset: con-bounces: 13733858 contentions: 15902322 waittime-total: 264902529.72 acq-bounces: 28161791 acquisitions: 38679282 After patchset: con-bounces: 12032220 contentions: 13598034 waittime-total: 221806127.28 acq-bounces: 24717947 acquisitions: 34103281 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: inline btrfs_space_info_used()Filipe Manana
The function is simple enough to be inlined and in fact doing it even reduces the object code. In x86_64 with gcc 14.2.0-19 from Debian the results were the following: Before this change $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko text data bss dec hex filename 1919410 161703 15592 2096705 1ffe41 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko After this change $ size fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko text data bss dec hex filename 1918991 161675 15592 2096258 1ffc82 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko Also remove the ASSERT() that checks the space_info argument is not NULL, as it's odd to be there since it can never be NULL and in case that ever happens during development, a stack trace from a NULL pointer dereference will be obvious. It was originally added when btrfs_space_info_used() was introduced in commit 4136135b080f ("Btrfs: use helper to get used bytes of space_info"). Also add a lockdep assertion to check the space_info's lock is being held by the calling task. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: make btrfs_can_overcommit() return bool instead of intFilipe Manana
It's a boolean function, so switch its return type to bool. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: remove fs_info argument from btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()Filipe Manana
We don't need it since we can grab fs_info from the given space_info. So remove the fs_info argument. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: remove fs_info argument from btrfs_dump_space_info()Filipe Manana
We don't need it since we can grab fs_info from the given space_info. So remove the fs_info argument. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: remove fs_info argument from btrfs_can_overcommit()Filipe Manana
We don't need it since we can grab fs_info from the given space_info. So remove the fs_info argument. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: remove fs_info argument from btrfs_try_granting_tickets()Filipe Manana
We don't need it since we can grab fs_info from the given space_info. So remove the fs_info argument. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-11-24btrfs: fix racy bitfield write in btrfs_clear_space_info_full()Boris Burkov
From the memory-barriers.txt document regarding memory barrier ordering guarantees: (*) These guarantees do not apply to bitfields, because compilers often generate code to modify these using non-atomic read-modify-write sequences. Do not attempt to use bitfields to synchronize parallel algorithms. (*) Even in cases where bitfields are protected by locks, all fields in a given bitfield must be protected by one lock. If two fields in a given bitfield are protected by different locks, the compiler's non-atomic read-modify-write sequences can cause an update to one field to corrupt the value of an adjacent field. btrfs_space_info has a bitfield sharing an underlying word consisting of the fields full, chunk_alloc, and flush: struct btrfs_space_info { struct btrfs_fs_info * fs_info; /* 0 8 */ struct btrfs_space_info * parent; /* 8 8 */ ... int clamp; /* 172 4 */ unsigned int full:1; /* 176: 0 4 */ unsigned int chunk_alloc:1; /* 176: 1 4 */ unsigned int flush:1; /* 176: 2 4 */ ... Therefore, to be safe from parallel read-modify-writes losing a write to one of the bitfield members protected by a lock, all writes to all the bitfields must use the lock. They almost universally do, except for btrfs_clear_space_info_full() which iterates over the space_infos and writes out found->full = 0 without a lock. Imagine that we have one thread completing a transaction in which we finished deleting a block_group and are thus calling btrfs_clear_space_info_full() while simultaneously the data reclaim ticket infrastructure is running do_async_reclaim_data_space(): T1 T2 btrfs_commit_transaction btrfs_clear_space_info_full data_sinfo->full = 0 READ: full:0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 do_async_reclaim_data_space(data_sinfo) spin_lock(&space_info->lock); if(list_empty(tickets)) space_info->flush = 0; READ: full: 0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 MOD/WRITE: full: 0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:0 spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); return; MOD/WRITE: full:0, chunk_alloc:0, flush:1 and now data_sinfo->flush is 1 but the reclaim worker has exited. This breaks the invariant that flush is 0 iff there is no work queued or running. Once this invariant is violated, future allocations that go into __reserve_bytes() will add tickets to space_info->tickets but will see space_info->flush is set to 1 and not queue the work. After this, they will block forever on the resulting ticket, as it is now impossible to kick the worker again. I also confirmed by looking at the assembly of the affected kernel that it is doing RMW operations. For example, to set the flush (3rd) bit to 0, the assembly is: andb $0xfb,0x60(%rbx) and similarly for setting the full (1st) bit to 0: andb $0xfe,-0x20(%rax) So I think this is really a bug on practical systems. I have observed a number of systems in this exact state, but am currently unable to reproduce it. Rather than leaving this footgun lying around for the future, take advantage of the fact that there is room in the struct anyway, and that it is already quite large and simply change the three bitfield members to bools. This avoids writes to space_info->full having any effect on writes to space_info->flush, regardless of locking. Fixes: 957780eb2788 ("Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-07-21btrfs: change dump_block_groups() in btrfs_dump_space_info() from int to boolJohannes Thumshirn
btrfs_dump_space_info()'s parameter dump_block_groups is used as a boolean although it is defined as an integer. Change it from int to bool. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-07-21btrfs: make btrfs_should_periodic_reclaim() staticJohannes Thumshirn
btrfs_should_periodic_reclaim() is not used outside of space-info.c so make it static and remove the prototype from space-info.h. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: introduce tree-log sub-space_infoNaohiro Aota
Introduce the tree-log sub-space_info, which is sub-space of metadata space_info and dedicated for tree-log node allocation. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: introduce btrfs_space_info sub-groupNaohiro Aota
Current code assumes we have only one space_info for each block group type (DATA, METADATA, and SYSTEM). We sometime need multiple space infos to manage special block groups. One example is handling the data relocation block group for the zoned mode. That block group is dedicated for writing relocated data and we cannot allocate any regular extent from that block group, which is implemented in the zoned extent allocator. This block group still belongs to the normal data space_info. So, when all the normal data block groups are full and there is some free space in the dedicated block group, the space_info looks to have some free space, while it cannot allocate normal extent anymore. That results in a strange ENOSPC error. We need to have a space_info for the relocation data block group to represent the situation properly. Adds a basic infrastructure for having a "sub-group" of a space_info: creation and removing. A sub-group space_info belongs to one of the primary space_infos and has the same flags as its parent. This commit first introduces the relocation data sub-space_info, and the next commit will introduce tree-log sub-space_info. In the future, it could be useful to implement tiered storage for btrfs e.g. by implementing a sub-group space_info for block groups resides on a fast storage. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: pass btrfs_space_info to btrfs_reserve_data_bytes()Naohiro Aota
Pass struct btrfs_space_info to btrfs_reserve_data_bytes() to allow reserving the data from multiple data space_info candidates. This is a preparation for the following commits and there is no functional change. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: zoned: reclaim unused zone by zone resettingNaohiro Aota
On the zoned mode, once used and freed region is still not reusable after the freeing. The underlying zone needs to be reset before reusing. Btrfs resets a zone when it removes a block group, and then new block group is allocated on the zones to reuse the zones. But, it is sometime too late to catch up with a write side. This commit introduces a new space-info reclaim method ZONE_RESET. That will pick a block group from the unused list and reset its zone to reuse the zone_unusable space. It is faster than removing the block group and re-creating a new block group on the same zones. For the first implementation, the ZONE_RESET is only applied to a block group whose region is fully zone_unusable. Reclaiming partial zone_unusable block group could be implemented later. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: drop fs_info argument from btrfs_update_space_info_*()Naohiro Aota
Since commit e1e577aafe41 ("btrfs: store fs_info in space_info"), we have the fs_info in a space_info. So, we can drop fs_info argument from btrfs_update_space_info_*. There is no behavior change. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: factor out btrfs_return_free_space()Naohiro Aota
Factor out a part of unpin_extent_range() that returns space back to the space info, prioritizing global block reserve. Also, move the "len" variable into the loop to clarify we don't need to carry it beyond an iteration. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-09-10btrfs: constify more pointer parametersDavid Sterba
Continue adding const to parameters. This is for clarity and minor addition to safety. There are some minor effects, in the assembly code and .ko measured on release config. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-08-27btrfs: fix uninitialized return value from btrfs_reclaim_sweep()Filipe Manana
The return variable 'ret' at btrfs_reclaim_sweep() is never assigned if none of the space infos is reclaimable (for example if periodic reclaim is disabled, which is the default), so we return an undefined value. This can be fixed my making btrfs_reclaim_sweep() not return any value as well as do_reclaim_sweep() because: 1) do_reclaim_sweep() always returns 0, so we can make it return void; 2) The only caller of btrfs_reclaim_sweep() (btrfs_reclaim_bgs()) doesn't care about its return value, and in its context there's nothing to do about any errors anyway. Therefore remove the return value from btrfs_reclaim_sweep() and do_reclaim_sweep(). Fixes: e4ca3932ae90 ("btrfs: periodic block_group reclaim") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-29btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block group read-write ↵Naohiro Aota
again When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all free regions in the block group to space_info->bytes_readonly. That free space excludes reserved and pinned regions. OTOH, when btrfs makes the block group read-write again, it moves all the unused regions into the block group's zone_unusable. That unused region includes reserved and pinned regions. As a result, it counts too much zone_unusable bytes. Fortunately (or unfortunately), having erroneous zone_unusable does not affect the calculation of space_info->bytes_readonly, because free space (num_bytes in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro) calculation is done based on the erroneous zone_unusable and it reduces the num_bytes just to cancel the error. This behavior can be easily discovered by adding a WARN_ON to check e.g, "bg->pinned > 0" in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(), and running fstests test case like btrfs/282. Fix it by properly considering pinned and reserved in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(). Also, add a WARN_ON and introduce btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable() to catch a similar mistake. Fixes: 169e0da91a21 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: prevent pathological periodic reclaim loopsBoris Burkov
Periodic reclaim runs the risk of getting stuck in a state where it keeps reclaiming the same block group over and over. This can happen if 1. reclaiming that block_group fails 2. reclaiming that block_group fails to move any extents into existing block_groups and just allocates a fresh chunk and moves everything. Currently, 1. is a very tight loop inside the reclaim worker. That is critical for edge triggered reclaim or else we risk forgetting about a reclaimable group. On the other hand, with level triggered reclaim we can break out of that loop and get it later. With that fixed, 2. applies to both failures and "successes" with no progress. If we have done a periodic reclaim on a space_info and nothing has changed in that space_info, there is not much point to trying again, so don't, until enough space gets free, which we capture with a heuristic of needing to net free 1 chunk. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: periodic block_group reclaimBoris Burkov
We currently employ a edge-triggered block group reclaim strategy which marks block groups for reclaim as they free down past a threshold. With a dynamic threshold, this is worse than doing it in a level-triggered fashion periodically. That is because the reclaim itself happens periodically, so the threshold at that point in time is what really matters, not the threshold at freeing time. If we mark the reclaim in a big pass, then sort by usage and do reclaim, we also benefit from a negative feedback loop preventing unnecessary reclaims as we crunch through the "best" candidates. Since this is quite a different model, it requires some additional support. The edge triggered reclaim has a good heuristic for not reclaiming fresh block groups, so we need to replace that with a typical GC sweep mark which skips block groups that have seen an allocation since the last sweep. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: dynamic block_group reclaim thresholdBoris Burkov
We can currently recover allocated block_groups by: - explicitly starting balance operations - "auto reclaim" via bg_reclaim_threshold The latter works by checking against a fixed threshold on frees. If we pass from above the threshold to below, relocation triggers and the block group will get reclaimed by the cleaner thread (assuming it is still eligible) Picking a threshold is challenging. Too high, and you end up trying to reclaim very full block_groups which is quite costly, and you don't do reclaim on block_groups that don't get quite THAT full, but could still be quite fragmented and stranding a lot of space. Too low, and you similarly miss out on reclaim even if you badly need it to avoid running out of unallocated space, if you have heavily fragmented block groups living above the threshold. No matter the threshold, it suffers from a workload that happens to bounce around that threshold, which can introduce arbitrary amounts of reclaim waste. To improve this situation, introduce a dynamic threshold. The basic idea behind this threshold is that it should be very lax when there is plenty of unallocated space, and increasingly aggressive as we approach zero unallocated space. To that end, it sets a target for unallocated space (10 chunks) and then linearly increases the threshold as the amount of space short of the target we are increases. The formula is: (target - unalloc) / target I tested this by running it on three interesting workloads: 1. bounce allocations around X% full. 2. fill up all the way and introduce full fragmentation. 3. write in a fragmented way until the filesystem is just about full. 1. and 2. attack the weaknesses of a fixed threshold; fixed either works perfectly or fully falls apart, depending on the threshold. Dynamic always handles these cases well. 3. attacks dynamic by checking whether it is too zealous to reclaim in conditions with low unallocated and low unused. It tends to claw back 1GiB of unallocated fairly aggressively, but not much more. Early versions of dynamic threshold struggled on this test. Additional work could be done to intelligently ratchet up the urgency of reclaim in very low unallocated conditions. Existing mechanisms are already useless in that case anyway. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: store fs_info in space_infoBoris Burkov
This is handy when computing space_info dynamic reclaim thresholds where we do not have access to a block group. We could add it to the various functions as a parameter, but it seems reasonable for space_info to have an fs_info pointer. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-07-11btrfs: report reclaim stats in sysfsBoris Burkov
When evaluating various reclaim strategies/thresholds against each other, it is useful to collect data about the amount of reclaim happening. Expose a count, error count, and byte count via sysfs per space_info. Note that this is only for automatic reclaim, not manually invoked balances or other codepaths that use "relocate_block_group" Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-03-04btrfs: add forward declarations and headers, part 2David Sterba
Do a cleanup in more headers: - add forward declarations for types referenced by pointers - add includes when types need them This fixes potential compilation problems if the headers are reordered or the missing includes are not provided indirectly. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: pass a space_info argument to btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()Filipe Manana
We are passing a block reserve argument to btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() which is not really used, all we need is to pass the space_info associated to the block reserve, we don't change the block reserve at all. Not only it's pointless to pass the block reserve, it's also confusing as one might think that the reserved bytes will end up being added to the passed block reserve, when that's not the case. The pattern for reserving space and adding it to a block reserve is to first reserve space with btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and if that succeeds, then add the space to a block reserve by calling btrfs_block_rsv_add_bytes(). Also the reverse of btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes(), which is btrfs_space_info_free_bytes_may_use(), takes a space_info argument and not a block reserve, so one more reason to pass a space_info and not a block reserve to btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes(). So change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and its callers to pass a space_info argument instead of a block reserve argument. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-10-12btrfs: include trace header in where necessaryJosef Bacik
If we no longer include the tracepoints from ctree.h we fail to compile because we have the dependency in some of the header files and source files. Add the include where we have these dependencies to allow us to remove the include from ctree.h. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-04-17btrfs: update documentation for BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EVICT flush methodFilipe Manana
The BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EVICT flush method can also commit transactions, see the definition of the evict_flush_states const array at space-info.c, but the documentation for it at space-info.h does not mention it. So update the documentation. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2023-03-15btrfs: zoned: drop space_info->active_total_bytesNaohiro Aota
The space_info->active_total_bytes is no longer necessary as we now count the region of newly allocated block group as zone_unusable. Drop its usage. Fixes: 6a921de58992 ("btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytes") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move btrfs_account_ro_block_groups_free_space into space-info.cJosef Bacik
This was prototyped in ctree.h and the code existed in extent-tree.c, but it's space-info related so move it into space-info.c. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: introduce BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EMERGENCYJosef Bacik
Inside of FB, as well as some user reports, we've had a consistent problem of occasional ENOSPC transaction aborts. Inside FB we were seeing ~100-200 ENOSPC aborts per day in the fleet, which is a really low occurrence rate given the size of our fleet, but it's not nothing. There are two causes of this particular problem. First is delayed allocation. The reservation system for delalloc assumes that contiguous dirty ranges will result in 1 file extent item. However if there is memory pressure that results in fragmented writeout, or there is fragmentation in the block groups, this won't necessarily be true. Consider the case where we do a single 256MiB write to a file and then close it. We will have 1 reservation for the inode update, the reservations for the checksum updates, and 1 reservation for the file extent item. At some point later we decide to write this entire range out, but we're so fragmented that we break this into 100 different file extents. Since we've already closed the file and are no longer writing to it there's nothing to trigger a refill of the delalloc block rsv to satisfy the 99 new file extent reservations we need. At this point we exhaust our delalloc reservation, and we begin to steal from the global reserve. If you have enough of these cases going in parallel you can easily exhaust the global reserve, get an ENOSPC at btrfs_alloc_tree_block() time, and then abort the transaction. The other case is the delayed refs reserve. The delayed refs reserve updates its size based on outstanding delayed refs and dirty block groups. However we only refill this block reserve when returning excess reservations and when we call btrfs_start_transaction(root, X). We will reserve 2*X credits at transaction start time, and fill in X into the delayed refs reserve to make sure it stays topped off. Generally this works well, but clearly has downsides. If we do a particularly delayed ref heavy operation we may never catch up in our reservations. Additionally running delayed refs generates more delayed refs, and at that point we may be committing the transaction and have no way to trigger a refill of our delayed refs rsv. Then a similar thing occurs with the delalloc reserve. Generally speaking we well over-reserve in all of our block rsvs. If we reserve 1 credit we're usually reserving around 264k of space, but we'll often not use any of that reservation, or use a few blocks of that reservation. We can be reasonably sure that as long as you were able to reserve space up front for your operation you'll be able to find space on disk for that reservation. So introduce a new flushing state, BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_EMERGENCY. This gets used in the case that we've exhausted our reserve and the global reserve. It simply forces a reservation if we have enough actual space on disk to make the reservation, which is almost always the case. This keeps us from hitting ENOSPC aborts in these odd occurrences where we've not kept up with the delayed work. Fixing this in a complete way is going to be relatively complicated and time consuming. This patch is what I discussed with Filipe earlier this year, and what I put into our kernels inside FB. With this patch we're down to 1-2 ENOSPC aborts per week, which is a significant reduction. This is a decent stop gap until we can work out a more wholistic solution to these two corner cases. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-12-05btrfs: move flush related definitions to space-info.hJosef Bacik
This code is used in space-info.c, move the definitions to space-info.h. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: move btrfs_init_async_reclaim_work prototype to space-info.hJosef Bacik
The code for this helper is in space-info.c, move the prototype to space-info.h. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: dump all space infos if we abort transaction due to ENOSPCQu Wenruo
We have hit some transaction abort due to -ENOSPC internally. Normally we should always reserve enough space for metadata for every transaction, thus hitting -ENOSPC should really indicate some cases we didn't expect. But unfortunately current error reporting will only give a kernel warning and stack trace, not really helpful to debug what's causing the problem. And mount option debug_enospc can only help when user can reproduce the problem, but under most cases, such transaction abort by -ENOSPC is really hard to reproduce. So this patch will dump all space infos (data, metadata, system) when we abort the first transaction with -ENOSPC. This should at least provide some clue to us. The example of a dump would look like this: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 3366 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2137 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf81/0xfb0 [btrfs] <call trace skipped> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): dumping space info: BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info DATA has 6791168 free, is not full BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info total=8388608, used=1597440, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info METADATA has 257114112 free, is not full BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info total=268435456, used=131072, pinned=180224, reserved=65536, may_use=10878976, readonly=65536 zone_unusable=0 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info SYSTEM has 8372224 free, is not full BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): space_info total=8388608, used=16384, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=0 zone_unusable=0 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): global_block_rsv: size 3670016 reserved 3670016 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): trans_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): chunk_block_rsv: size 0 reserved 0 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): delayed_block_rsv: size 4063232 reserved 4063232 BTRFS info (device dm-1: state A): delayed_refs_rsv: size 3145728 reserved 3145728 BTRFS: error (device dm-1: state A) in btrfs_commit_transaction:2137: errno=-28 No space left BTRFS info (device dm-1: state EA): forced readonly Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: handle space_info setting of bg in btrfs_add_bg_to_space_infoJosef Bacik
We previously had the pattern of btrfs_update_space_info(all, the, bg, fields, &space_info); link_block_group(bg); bg->space_info = space_info; Now that we're passing the bg into btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info we can do the linking in that function, transforming this to simply btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info(fs_info, bg); and put the link_block_group() and bg->space_info assignment directly in btrfs_add_bg_to_space_info. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-09-26btrfs: simplify arguments of btrfs_update_space_info and renameJosef Bacik
This function has grown a bunch of new arguments, and it just boils down to passing in all the block group fields as arguments. Simplify this by passing in the block group itself and updating the space_info fields based on the block group fields directly. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: zoned: introduce space_info->active_total_bytesNaohiro Aota
The active_total_bytes, like the total_bytes, accounts for the total bytes of active block groups in the space_info. With an introduction of active_total_bytes, we can check if the reserved bytes can be written to the block groups without activating a new block group. The check is necessary for metadata allocation on zoned filesystem. We cannot finish a block group, which may require waiting for the current transaction, from the metadata allocation context. Instead, we need to ensure the ongoing allocation (reserved bytes) fits in active block groups. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-07-25btrfs: store chunk size in space-info structStefan Roesch
The chunk size is stored in the btrfs_space_info structure. It is initialized at the start and is then used. A new API is added to update the current chunk size. This API is used to be able to expose the chunk_size as a sysfs setting. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ rename and merge helpers, switch atomic type to u64, style fixes ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: move definition of btrfs_raid_types to volumes.hQu Wenruo
It's only internally used as another way to represent btrfs profiles, it's not exposed through any on-disk format, in fact this btrfs_raid_types is diverted from the on-disk format values. Furthermore, since it's internal structure, its definition can change in the future. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-05-16btrfs: make the bg_reclaim_threshold per-space infoJosef Bacik
For non-zoned file systems it's useful to have the auto reclaim feature, however there are different use cases for non-zoned, for example we may not want to reclaim metadata chunks ever, only data chunks. Move this sysfs flag to per-space_info. This won't affect current users because this tunable only ever did anything for zoned, and that is currently hidden behind BTRFS_CONFIG_DEBUG. Tested-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> [ jth restore global bg_reclaim_threshold ] Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2022-01-03btrfs: change root to fs_info for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytesJosef Bacik
We used to need the root for btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes to check the orphan cleanup state, but we no longer need that, we simply need the fs_info. Change btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() to use the fs_info, and change both btrfs_block_rsv_refill() and btrfs_block_rsv_add() to do the same as they simply call btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes() and then manipulate the block_rsv that is being used. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22btrfs: rip out btrfs_space_info::total_bytes_pinnedJosef Bacik
We used this in may_commit_transaction() in order to determine if we needed to commit the transaction. However we no longer have that logic and thus have no use of this counter anymore, so delete it. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-09btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zonesNaohiro Aota
In a zoned filesystem a once written then freed region is not usable until the underlying zone has been reset. So we need to distinguish such unusable space from usable free space. Therefore we need to introduce the "zone_unusable" field to the block group structure, and "bytes_zone_unusable" to the space_info structure to track the unusable space. Pinned bytes are always reclaimed to the unusable space. But, when an allocated region is returned before using e.g., the block group becomes read-only between allocation time and reservation time, we can safely return the region to the block group. For the situation, this commit introduces "btrfs_add_free_space_unused". This behaves the same as btrfs_add_free_space() on regular filesystem. On zoned filesystems, it rewinds the allocation offset. Because the read-only bytes tracks free but unusable bytes when the block group is read-only, we need to migrate the zone_unusable bytes to read-only bytes when a block group is marked read-only. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-08btrfs: implement space clamping for preemptive flushingJosef Bacik
Starting preemptive flushing at 50% of available free space is a good start, but some workloads are particularly abusive and can quickly overwhelm the preemptive flushing code and drive us into using tickets. Handle this by clamping down on our threshold for starting and continuing to run preemptive flushing. This is particularly important for our overcommit case, as we can really drive the file system into overages and then it's more difficult to pull it back as we start to actually fill up the file system. The clamping is essentially 2^CLAMP, but we start at 1 so whatever we calculate for overcommit is the baseline. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>